柏拉图三部曲与《菲利伯斯》中的辩证方法与化学范式

IF 0.1 0 PHILOSOPHY
Colin C. Smith
{"title":"柏拉图三部曲与《菲利伯斯》中的辩证方法与化学范式","authors":"Colin C. Smith","doi":"10.14195/2183-4105_19_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus.  I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method.  At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others.  These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.","PeriodicalId":53756,"journal":{"name":"Plato Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus\",\"authors\":\"Colin C. Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.14195/2183-4105_19_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus.  I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method.  At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others.  These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plato Journal\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plato Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_19_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plato Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14195/2183-4105_19_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

柏拉图的《泰阿德图》、《诡辩家》和《政治家》展示了几种与柏拉图式教育相关的辩证方法:《泰阿德图》中的辩证法,《诡辩家》和《政治家》中的分岔法,《政治家》中的非分岔法,与《菲利伯斯》中的“上帝赋予的”方法有关。我通过字母或元素(στοιχε ον)范式来考虑每种方法的性质,用于反思每种方法。争论的焦点是某一要素在特定语境中的表现,它与同类其他要素的交往的适宜性,以及它通过与其他要素的关系所定义的自身性质。这些都是柏拉图式的学生探究知识来源的不同阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dialectical Methods and the Stoicheia Paradigm in Plato’s Trilogy and Philebus
Plato’s Theaetetus, Sophist, and Statesman exhibit several related dialectical methods relevant to Platonic education: maieutic in Theaetetus, bifurcatory division in Sophist and Statesman, and non-bifurcatory division in Statesman, related to the ‘god-given’ method in Philebus.  I consider the nature of each method through the letter or element (στοιχεῖον) paradigm, used to reflect on each method.  At issue are the element’s appearances in given contexts, its fitness for communing with other elements like it in kind, and its own nature defined through its relations to others.  These represent stages of inquiry for the Platonic student inquiring into the sources of knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Plato Journal
Plato Journal PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
35 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信