{"title":"堕胎和不当负担","authors":"P. Sullivan, Steven R. Goldzwig","doi":"10.1300/J014V16N03_02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay argues that Sandra Day O'Connor's moral reasoning concerning abortion cases represents a female-associated jurisprudence. A female-associated jurisprudence negotiates a moral ground that values the rights of individuals as interdependent members of communities. From the recognition of the need to balance such interests emerges a jurisprudence that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all parties and all competing interests in a dispute.. In articulating \"undue burden\" standard for evaluating abortion cases, Justice O'Connor has identified an approach to legal decision-making that accomodates difference, contextualizes the law, and resists oversimplification of complex issues.","PeriodicalId":83535,"journal":{"name":"Women & politics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J014V16N03_02","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abortion and Undue Burdens\",\"authors\":\"P. Sullivan, Steven R. Goldzwig\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J014V16N03_02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay argues that Sandra Day O'Connor's moral reasoning concerning abortion cases represents a female-associated jurisprudence. A female-associated jurisprudence negotiates a moral ground that values the rights of individuals as interdependent members of communities. From the recognition of the need to balance such interests emerges a jurisprudence that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all parties and all competing interests in a dispute.. In articulating \\\"undue burden\\\" standard for evaluating abortion cases, Justice O'Connor has identified an approach to legal decision-making that accomodates difference, contextualizes the law, and resists oversimplification of complex issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83535,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Women & politics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J014V16N03_02\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Women & politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J014V16N03_02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J014V16N03_02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This essay argues that Sandra Day O'Connor's moral reasoning concerning abortion cases represents a female-associated jurisprudence. A female-associated jurisprudence negotiates a moral ground that values the rights of individuals as interdependent members of communities. From the recognition of the need to balance such interests emerges a jurisprudence that emphasizes the interconnectedness of all parties and all competing interests in a dispute.. In articulating "undue burden" standard for evaluating abortion cases, Justice O'Connor has identified an approach to legal decision-making that accomodates difference, contextualizes the law, and resists oversimplification of complex issues.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
