LSTM和ARIMA对比特币价格短期预测的比较表现

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Navmeen Latif, Joseph Durai Selvam, Manohar Kapse, Vinod Sharma, Vaishali Mahajan
{"title":"LSTM和ARIMA对比特币价格短期预测的比较表现","authors":"Navmeen Latif, Joseph Durai Selvam, Manohar Kapse, Vinod Sharma, Vaishali Mahajan","doi":"10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research assesses the prediction of Bitcoin prices using the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long-short-term memory (LSTM) models. We forecast the price of Bitcoin for the following day using the static forecast method, with and without re-estimating the forecast model at each step. We take two different training and test samples into consideration for the cross-validation of forecast findings. In the first training sample, ARIMA outperforms LSTM, but in the second training sample, LSTM exceeds ARIMA. Additionally, in the two test-sample forecast periods, LSTM with model re-estimation at each step surpasses ARIMA. Comparing LSTM to ARIMA, the forecasts were much closer to the actual historical prices. As opposed to ARIMA, which could only track the trend of Bitcoin prices, the LSTM model was able to predict both the direction and the value during the specified time period. This research exhibits LSTM's persistent capacity for fluctuating Bitcoin price prediction despite the sophistication of ARIMA.","PeriodicalId":45715,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Performance of LSTM and ARIMA for the Short-Term Prediction of Bitcoin Prices\",\"authors\":\"Navmeen Latif, Joseph Durai Selvam, Manohar Kapse, Vinod Sharma, Vaishali Mahajan\",\"doi\":\"10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research assesses the prediction of Bitcoin prices using the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long-short-term memory (LSTM) models. We forecast the price of Bitcoin for the following day using the static forecast method, with and without re-estimating the forecast model at each step. We take two different training and test samples into consideration for the cross-validation of forecast findings. In the first training sample, ARIMA outperforms LSTM, but in the second training sample, LSTM exceeds ARIMA. Additionally, in the two test-sample forecast periods, LSTM with model re-estimation at each step surpasses ARIMA. Comparing LSTM to ARIMA, the forecasts were much closer to the actual historical prices. As opposed to ARIMA, which could only track the trend of Bitcoin prices, the LSTM model was able to predict both the direction and the value during the specified time period. This research exhibits LSTM's persistent capacity for fluctuating Bitcoin price prediction despite the sophistication of ARIMA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14453/aabfj.v17i1.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究使用自回归综合移动平均(ARIMA)和长短期记忆(LSTM)模型评估了比特币价格的预测。我们使用静态预测方法预测第二天的比特币价格,每一步都对预测模型进行重新估计和不重新估计。我们考虑了两个不同的训练和测试样本来交叉验证预测结果。在第一个训练样本中,ARIMA优于LSTM,而在第二个训练样本中,LSTM优于ARIMA。此外,在两个测试样本预测周期中,每一步都进行模型重估计的LSTM优于ARIMA。将LSTM与ARIMA进行比较,预测结果更接近实际历史价格。与ARIMA只能跟踪比特币价格的趋势不同,LSTM模型能够预测指定时间段内的方向和价值。尽管ARIMA很复杂,但本研究显示LSTM对比特币价格波动的持续预测能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Performance of LSTM and ARIMA for the Short-Term Prediction of Bitcoin Prices
This research assesses the prediction of Bitcoin prices using the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) and long-short-term memory (LSTM) models. We forecast the price of Bitcoin for the following day using the static forecast method, with and without re-estimating the forecast model at each step. We take two different training and test samples into consideration for the cross-validation of forecast findings. In the first training sample, ARIMA outperforms LSTM, but in the second training sample, LSTM exceeds ARIMA. Additionally, in the two test-sample forecast periods, LSTM with model re-estimation at each step surpasses ARIMA. Comparing LSTM to ARIMA, the forecasts were much closer to the actual historical prices. As opposed to ARIMA, which could only track the trend of Bitcoin prices, the LSTM model was able to predict both the direction and the value during the specified time period. This research exhibits LSTM's persistent capacity for fluctuating Bitcoin price prediction despite the sophistication of ARIMA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
15.80%
发文量
22
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal is a double blind peer reviewed academic journal. The main focus of our journal is to encourage research from areas of social and environmental critique, exploration and innovation as well as from more traditional areas of accounting, finance, financial planning and banking research. There are no fees or charges associated with submitting to or publishing in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信