{"title":"科学诚信的定义","authors":"J. D. Winter","doi":"10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because society depends so thoroughly on advances in scientific knowledge, the integrity of scientific research has become of utmost importance. Yet scientific integrity is hard to define. There are many instances where it is breached even when there is no falsification or fabrication of evidence. To pass muster scientific research must meet epistemic standards implicit in the kind o inquiry it is, but a general definition of these standards is elusive.","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":"29-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Defining Scientific Integrity\",\"authors\":\"J. D. Winter\",\"doi\":\"10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Because society depends so thoroughly on advances in scientific knowledge, the integrity of scientific research has become of utmost importance. Yet scientific integrity is hard to define. There are many instances where it is breached even when there is no falsification or fabrication of evidence. To pass muster scientific research must meet epistemic standards implicit in the kind o inquiry it is, but a general definition of these standards is elusive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"29-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.580\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Because society depends so thoroughly on advances in scientific knowledge, the integrity of scientific research has become of utmost importance. Yet scientific integrity is hard to define. There are many instances where it is breached even when there is no falsification or fabrication of evidence. To pass muster scientific research must meet epistemic standards implicit in the kind o inquiry it is, but a general definition of these standards is elusive.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
