气候伦理中的若干标量问题

Evan Berry
{"title":"气候伦理中的若干标量问题","authors":"Evan Berry","doi":"10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The intensifying processes of globalization have forced scholars and policy-makers to recognize the limited capacities of nation states and have reanimated interest in cosmopolitanism and in global ethics, that is, the idea that people are directly responsible to each other rather than indirectly through collective agencies such as states.  This article describes problems that attend the shift from states to persons as the kinds of agents most suited to respond to climate change.  It argues for more philosophical attention to the levels of organization and scales of analysis that make sense in the context of global challenges.","PeriodicalId":82464,"journal":{"name":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","volume":"746 1","pages":"22-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics\",\"authors\":\"Evan Berry\",\"doi\":\"10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.579\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The intensifying processes of globalization have forced scholars and policy-makers to recognize the limited capacities of nation states and have reanimated interest in cosmopolitanism and in global ethics, that is, the idea that people are directly responsible to each other rather than indirectly through collective agencies such as states.  This article describes problems that attend the shift from states to persons as the kinds of agents most suited to respond to climate change.  It argues for more philosophical attention to the levels of organization and scales of analysis that make sense in the context of global challenges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82464,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"volume\":\"746 1\",\"pages\":\"22-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.579\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Report from the Institute for Philosophy & Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13021/G8PPPQ.322014.579","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球化进程的加剧迫使学者和政策制定者认识到民族国家的能力有限,并重新燃起了对世界主义和全球伦理的兴趣,也就是说,人们直接对彼此负责,而不是通过国家等集体机构间接负责。这篇文章描述了从国家到个人作为最适合应对气候变化的代理人的转变所带来的问题。它主张对在全球挑战背景下有意义的组织层次和分析规模给予更多的哲学关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some Scalar Issues in Climate Ethics
The intensifying processes of globalization have forced scholars and policy-makers to recognize the limited capacities of nation states and have reanimated interest in cosmopolitanism and in global ethics, that is, the idea that people are directly responsible to each other rather than indirectly through collective agencies such as states.  This article describes problems that attend the shift from states to persons as the kinds of agents most suited to respond to climate change.  It argues for more philosophical attention to the levels of organization and scales of analysis that make sense in the context of global challenges.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信