{"title":"康拉德Mägi绘画中色彩的意向性","authors":"Anne Kokkov","doi":"10.12697/BJAH.2014.8.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this article is to discuss the intentionality of colours in the picture. To illustrate the behaviour of colours in the picture I discuss some of Konrad Magi’s paintings from the 1920s. For explicating some aspects of seeing the intentional picture I make references to Gestalt theory and colour theory. This treatment is based on Roman Ingarden’s ontological essay “The Picture” in which he ingeniously differentiates two phenomena: ‘painting’ and ‘the intentional picture’. At the same time, when discussing the role of colours for the picture R. Ingarden does not distinguish between the concepts of ‘colour’ as ‘dye’ and ‘colour’ as ‘hue’. R. Ingarden explicates the specific role of colours in painting arguing that colours only have a constructional role for the intentional work of art, but the colours themselves are not part of the work of art. However, a transition of the material dyes into phenomenal colours – hues – occurs in the patches of colour when light falls on them. Since he does not differentiate between the concepts of ‘dye’ and ‘hue,’ R. Ingarden neglects the possibility of discussing the phenomenal colours in the intentional picture. The presented objectivity “visible” in the intentional picture is colourful. The pictorial objects have several qualities, the qualities of colours among others. Unlike R. Ingarden, I am confident that different colour phenomena occur in the relations of colours that cannot be reduced to the material level of painting. The colouration of the intentionally “visible” pictorial objects appears phenomenally as the total of the relations of phenomenal colours. Since R. Ingarden does not treat colours as phenomenal, he also neglects the option of discussing the intentionality of he pictorial colours. My assertion is that, in the process of perceiving the work of art of painting, in picture-consciousness, the colouration of the pictorial objectivity is intentionally given. The interrelations of phenomenal hues constitute the intentionally visible objectual “light” and colouring of the pictorial objectivity; the relations of colours acquire new qualities that the patches of colour do not contain. Therefore, in the intentional picture, colours should be treated as intentional.","PeriodicalId":52089,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Art History","volume":"8 1","pages":"157-188"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intentionality of Colours in Konrad Mägi ’s Paintings\",\"authors\":\"Anne Kokkov\",\"doi\":\"10.12697/BJAH.2014.8.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of this article is to discuss the intentionality of colours in the picture. To illustrate the behaviour of colours in the picture I discuss some of Konrad Magi’s paintings from the 1920s. For explicating some aspects of seeing the intentional picture I make references to Gestalt theory and colour theory. This treatment is based on Roman Ingarden’s ontological essay “The Picture” in which he ingeniously differentiates two phenomena: ‘painting’ and ‘the intentional picture’. At the same time, when discussing the role of colours for the picture R. Ingarden does not distinguish between the concepts of ‘colour’ as ‘dye’ and ‘colour’ as ‘hue’. R. Ingarden explicates the specific role of colours in painting arguing that colours only have a constructional role for the intentional work of art, but the colours themselves are not part of the work of art. However, a transition of the material dyes into phenomenal colours – hues – occurs in the patches of colour when light falls on them. Since he does not differentiate between the concepts of ‘dye’ and ‘hue,’ R. Ingarden neglects the possibility of discussing the phenomenal colours in the intentional picture. The presented objectivity “visible” in the intentional picture is colourful. The pictorial objects have several qualities, the qualities of colours among others. Unlike R. Ingarden, I am confident that different colour phenomena occur in the relations of colours that cannot be reduced to the material level of painting. The colouration of the intentionally “visible” pictorial objects appears phenomenally as the total of the relations of phenomenal colours. Since R. Ingarden does not treat colours as phenomenal, he also neglects the option of discussing the intentionality of he pictorial colours. My assertion is that, in the process of perceiving the work of art of painting, in picture-consciousness, the colouration of the pictorial objectivity is intentionally given. The interrelations of phenomenal hues constitute the intentionally visible objectual “light” and colouring of the pictorial objectivity; the relations of colours acquire new qualities that the patches of colour do not contain. Therefore, in the intentional picture, colours should be treated as intentional.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52089,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Art History\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"157-188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Art History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2014.8.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Art History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12697/BJAH.2014.8.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intentionality of Colours in Konrad Mägi ’s Paintings
The goal of this article is to discuss the intentionality of colours in the picture. To illustrate the behaviour of colours in the picture I discuss some of Konrad Magi’s paintings from the 1920s. For explicating some aspects of seeing the intentional picture I make references to Gestalt theory and colour theory. This treatment is based on Roman Ingarden’s ontological essay “The Picture” in which he ingeniously differentiates two phenomena: ‘painting’ and ‘the intentional picture’. At the same time, when discussing the role of colours for the picture R. Ingarden does not distinguish between the concepts of ‘colour’ as ‘dye’ and ‘colour’ as ‘hue’. R. Ingarden explicates the specific role of colours in painting arguing that colours only have a constructional role for the intentional work of art, but the colours themselves are not part of the work of art. However, a transition of the material dyes into phenomenal colours – hues – occurs in the patches of colour when light falls on them. Since he does not differentiate between the concepts of ‘dye’ and ‘hue,’ R. Ingarden neglects the possibility of discussing the phenomenal colours in the intentional picture. The presented objectivity “visible” in the intentional picture is colourful. The pictorial objects have several qualities, the qualities of colours among others. Unlike R. Ingarden, I am confident that different colour phenomena occur in the relations of colours that cannot be reduced to the material level of painting. The colouration of the intentionally “visible” pictorial objects appears phenomenally as the total of the relations of phenomenal colours. Since R. Ingarden does not treat colours as phenomenal, he also neglects the option of discussing the intentionality of he pictorial colours. My assertion is that, in the process of perceiving the work of art of painting, in picture-consciousness, the colouration of the pictorial objectivity is intentionally given. The interrelations of phenomenal hues constitute the intentionally visible objectual “light” and colouring of the pictorial objectivity; the relations of colours acquire new qualities that the patches of colour do not contain. Therefore, in the intentional picture, colours should be treated as intentional.
期刊介绍:
THE BALTIC JOURNAL OF ART HISTORY is an official publication of the Department of Art History of the Institute of History and Archaeology of the University of Tartu. It is published by the University of Tartu Press in cooperation with the Department of Art History. The concept of the journal is to ask contributions from different authors whose ideas and research findings in terms of their content and high academic quality invite them to be published. We are mainly looking forward to lengthy articles of monographic character as well as shorter pieces where the issues raised or the new facts presented cover topics that have not yet been shed light on or open up new art geographies.