{"title":"为什么创新必须克服常规","authors":"P. Kesting","doi":"10.1400/76923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper argues why it is useful to build a theory of entrepreneurship based on a concept of routine. In particular, this paper offers two reasons : First, routine theory provides a convincing decision theoretic foundation for entrepreneurship and its dichotomous distinction from « ordinary production ». Second, in contrast to traditional decision theory, routine theory is capable of producing the main characteristics that Schumpeter as well as many evolutionary economists have assigned to entrepreneurship, such as path dependencies, ignorance and learning, and the meaning of personality traits like leadership potential for entrepreneurship.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"15 1","pages":"1000-1020"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Innovations have to Overcome Routine\",\"authors\":\"P. Kesting\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/76923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper argues why it is useful to build a theory of entrepreneurship based on a concept of routine. In particular, this paper offers two reasons : First, routine theory provides a convincing decision theoretic foundation for entrepreneurship and its dichotomous distinction from « ordinary production ». Second, in contrast to traditional decision theory, routine theory is capable of producing the main characteristics that Schumpeter as well as many evolutionary economists have assigned to entrepreneurship, such as path dependencies, ignorance and learning, and the meaning of personality traits like leadership potential for entrepreneurship.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"1000-1020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/76923\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/76923","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper argues why it is useful to build a theory of entrepreneurship based on a concept of routine. In particular, this paper offers two reasons : First, routine theory provides a convincing decision theoretic foundation for entrepreneurship and its dichotomous distinction from « ordinary production ». Second, in contrast to traditional decision theory, routine theory is capable of producing the main characteristics that Schumpeter as well as many evolutionary economists have assigned to entrepreneurship, such as path dependencies, ignorance and learning, and the meaning of personality traits like leadership potential for entrepreneurship.
期刊介绍:
History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.