熊彼特在决策、博弈和经济行为建模中的创新

Q2 Arts and Humanities
P. Hammond
{"title":"熊彼特在决策、博弈和经济行为建模中的创新","authors":"P. Hammond","doi":"10.1400/76924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Von Neumann’s standard paradigm of a game in extensive form and Kolmogorov’s standard model of a stochastic process both rely on constructing a fixed state space large enough to include all possible future eventualities. This allows a typical singleperson decision problem to be represented as a decision tree. Yet not all eventualities can be foreseen. Also, any practical decision model must limit the state space rather severely. In this way the standard paradigm excludes not only Schumpeter’s ideas regarding entrepreneurship, innovation and development, but also Shackle’s «unexpected events». This paper proposes an alternative approach using ‘decision jungles’ with an evolving state space.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"15 1","pages":"1000-1017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Schumpeterian Innovation in Modelling Decisions, Games, and Economic Behaviour\",\"authors\":\"P. Hammond\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/76924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Von Neumann’s standard paradigm of a game in extensive form and Kolmogorov’s standard model of a stochastic process both rely on constructing a fixed state space large enough to include all possible future eventualities. This allows a typical singleperson decision problem to be represented as a decision tree. Yet not all eventualities can be foreseen. Also, any practical decision model must limit the state space rather severely. In this way the standard paradigm excludes not only Schumpeter’s ideas regarding entrepreneurship, innovation and development, but also Shackle’s «unexpected events». This paper proposes an alternative approach using ‘decision jungles’ with an evolving state space.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"1000-1017\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/76924\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/76924","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

冯·诺伊曼关于广泛形式博弈的标准范式和Kolmogorov关于随机过程的标准模型都依赖于构建一个足够大的固定状态空间,以包含所有可能的未来事件。这允许将典型的单人决策问题表示为决策树。然而,并非所有可能发生的事情都可以预见。此外,任何实际的决策模型都必须严格限制状态空间。这样,标准范式不仅排除了熊彼特关于企业家精神、创新和发展的观点,也排除了沙克尔的“意外事件”。本文提出了一种替代方法,使用具有不断发展的状态空间的“决策丛林”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Schumpeterian Innovation in Modelling Decisions, Games, and Economic Behaviour
Von Neumann’s standard paradigm of a game in extensive form and Kolmogorov’s standard model of a stochastic process both rely on constructing a fixed state space large enough to include all possible future eventualities. This allows a typical singleperson decision problem to be represented as a decision tree. Yet not all eventualities can be foreseen. Also, any practical decision model must limit the state space rather severely. In this way the standard paradigm excludes not only Schumpeter’s ideas regarding entrepreneurship, innovation and development, but also Shackle’s «unexpected events». This paper proposes an alternative approach using ‘decision jungles’ with an evolving state space.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
History of Economic Ideas
History of Economic Ideas Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信