{"title":"卡恩-希克斯对凯恩斯《货币论》中价格独立性的批判","authors":"Alexander Tobón","doi":"10.1400/54093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keynes formulated the idea that consumer goods prices are independent of prices for new investment goods. This notion was rejected by Kahn, who felt that an independence of this sort stems from certain highly specific hypotheses. Unfortunately, after corresponding with Kahn, Keynes ended up by accepting this criticism. A few years later, Hicks resurrected Kahn's viewpoint when commenting upon the Treatise. The purpose of the present text is to demonstrate that Kahn-Hicks's criticism is incompatible with the central message of the Treatise, since it implies an equality between investment and savings, asserting their identicalness, whereas for Keynes this equality is a condition of monetary equilibrium.","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"14 1","pages":"113-122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kahn-Hicks' Criticism of the Independence of Prices in Keynes' «Treatise on Money»\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Tobón\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/54093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Keynes formulated the idea that consumer goods prices are independent of prices for new investment goods. This notion was rejected by Kahn, who felt that an independence of this sort stems from certain highly specific hypotheses. Unfortunately, after corresponding with Kahn, Keynes ended up by accepting this criticism. A few years later, Hicks resurrected Kahn's viewpoint when commenting upon the Treatise. The purpose of the present text is to demonstrate that Kahn-Hicks's criticism is incompatible with the central message of the Treatise, since it implies an equality between investment and savings, asserting their identicalness, whereas for Keynes this equality is a condition of monetary equilibrium.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"113-122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/54093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/54093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Kahn-Hicks' Criticism of the Independence of Prices in Keynes' «Treatise on Money»
Keynes formulated the idea that consumer goods prices are independent of prices for new investment goods. This notion was rejected by Kahn, who felt that an independence of this sort stems from certain highly specific hypotheses. Unfortunately, after corresponding with Kahn, Keynes ended up by accepting this criticism. A few years later, Hicks resurrected Kahn's viewpoint when commenting upon the Treatise. The purpose of the present text is to demonstrate that Kahn-Hicks's criticism is incompatible with the central message of the Treatise, since it implies an equality between investment and savings, asserting their identicalness, whereas for Keynes this equality is a condition of monetary equilibrium.
期刊介绍:
History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.