教育学中经验概念理解的类型学

Leszek Waga
{"title":"教育学中经验概念理解的类型学","authors":"Leszek Waga","doi":"10.12775/PBE.2019.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to present possible typologies of experience and to point out the need to allow for the multidimensionality of experience categories in pedagogical research. Since experience is primarily a philosophical concept, the first section presents a generally acceptable definition of experience. The second section refers to the main philosophical, epistemological and methodological typologies of experience. The last of the typologies which may be of particular use in pedagogy has been discussed in the third section. It describes experience as an activity, its production (result), and a way of perceiving something. This typology organises the types of understanding experiences in pedagogical literature, considering all the elements of the educational relation. Reflections on the understanding of experience in pedagogy lead to the conclusion that the discipline cannot ignore different typologies of experience or the multidimensional contexts of its occurrence and experience itself turns out to be the category that integrates different levels of pedagogical knowledge. At the same time, it was confirmed that one may not analyse ontological, epistemological and methodological concepts or categories in pedagogy in isolation from philosophical considerations. Otherwise, one may be exposed to ignorance or unjustified simplifications.","PeriodicalId":33219,"journal":{"name":"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Typologies of the Understanding of the Experience Notion in Pedagogy\",\"authors\":\"Leszek Waga\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/PBE.2019.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is to present possible typologies of experience and to point out the need to allow for the multidimensionality of experience categories in pedagogical research. Since experience is primarily a philosophical concept, the first section presents a generally acceptable definition of experience. The second section refers to the main philosophical, epistemological and methodological typologies of experience. The last of the typologies which may be of particular use in pedagogy has been discussed in the third section. It describes experience as an activity, its production (result), and a way of perceiving something. This typology organises the types of understanding experiences in pedagogical literature, considering all the elements of the educational relation. Reflections on the understanding of experience in pedagogy lead to the conclusion that the discipline cannot ignore different typologies of experience or the multidimensional contexts of its occurrence and experience itself turns out to be the category that integrates different levels of pedagogical knowledge. At the same time, it was confirmed that one may not analyse ontological, epistemological and methodological concepts or categories in pedagogy in isolation from philosophical considerations. Otherwise, one may be exposed to ignorance or unjustified simplifications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2019.008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przeglad Badan Edukacyjnych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/PBE.2019.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文的目的是提出可能的经验类型学,并指出在教学研究中需要允许经验类别的多维性。由于经验主要是一个哲学概念,第一部分提出了一个普遍接受的经验定义。第二部分介绍了经验的主要哲学类型、认识论类型和方法论类型。最后一种类型可能在教育学中特别使用,已在第三节中讨论。它将经验描述为一种活动,它的生产(结果),以及一种感知事物的方式。这种类型学组织了教育文学中理解经验的类型,考虑了教育关系的所有要素。对教育学中对经验的理解的反思得出这样的结论:这门学科不能忽视经验的不同类型或其发生的多维语境,经验本身就是整合不同层次教学知识的范畴。与此同时,它证实了人们不能孤立于哲学考虑来分析教育学中的本体论、认识论和方法论概念或范畴。否则,人们可能会陷入无知或不合理的简单化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Typologies of the Understanding of the Experience Notion in Pedagogy
The aim of this paper is to present possible typologies of experience and to point out the need to allow for the multidimensionality of experience categories in pedagogical research. Since experience is primarily a philosophical concept, the first section presents a generally acceptable definition of experience. The second section refers to the main philosophical, epistemological and methodological typologies of experience. The last of the typologies which may be of particular use in pedagogy has been discussed in the third section. It describes experience as an activity, its production (result), and a way of perceiving something. This typology organises the types of understanding experiences in pedagogical literature, considering all the elements of the educational relation. Reflections on the understanding of experience in pedagogy lead to the conclusion that the discipline cannot ignore different typologies of experience or the multidimensional contexts of its occurrence and experience itself turns out to be the category that integrates different levels of pedagogical knowledge. At the same time, it was confirmed that one may not analyse ontological, epistemological and methodological concepts or categories in pedagogy in isolation from philosophical considerations. Otherwise, one may be exposed to ignorance or unjustified simplifications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信