{"title":"识别和发展康复设置有效的干预措施:认识到循证实践方法的局限性","authors":"G. Murphy, N. King, T. Ollendick","doi":"10.1375/JRC.13.1.14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The evidence-based practice movement has led to higher quality intervention studies being reported in the health sciences literature (see, for example, Mosely et al., 2002), and consequently being available for uptake by practising health professionals. Yet interventions in applied settings need to satisfy more than the methodologically-based criteria associated with being categorised as a 'well-established treatment' (Chambless et al., 1996). Some of these additional criteria were recently described by King and Ollendick (2007). The current article extends these criteria so as to include attributes of interventions that (ideally) are required when designing or delivering services within rehabilitation settings.","PeriodicalId":43415,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1375/JRC.13.1.14","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identifying and Developing Effective Interventions in Rehabilitation Settings: Recognising the Limits of the Evidence-Based Practice Approach\",\"authors\":\"G. Murphy, N. King, T. Ollendick\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/JRC.13.1.14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The evidence-based practice movement has led to higher quality intervention studies being reported in the health sciences literature (see, for example, Mosely et al., 2002), and consequently being available for uptake by practising health professionals. Yet interventions in applied settings need to satisfy more than the methodologically-based criteria associated with being categorised as a 'well-established treatment' (Chambless et al., 1996). Some of these additional criteria were recently described by King and Ollendick (2007). The current article extends these criteria so as to include attributes of interventions that (ideally) are required when designing or delivering services within rehabilitation settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1375/JRC.13.1.14\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/JRC.13.1.14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/JRC.13.1.14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
循证实践运动已导致卫生科学文献中报告了更高质量的干预研究(例如,见Mosely等人,2002年),因此可供执业卫生专业人员采用。然而,应用环境中的干预措施需要满足的不仅仅是与归类为“成熟治疗”相关的基于方法学的标准(Chambless et al., 1996)。King和Ollendick(2007)最近描述了其中一些附加标准。当前的文章扩展了这些标准,以便包括在康复环境中设计或提供服务时(理想情况下)所需的干预措施的属性。
Identifying and Developing Effective Interventions in Rehabilitation Settings: Recognising the Limits of the Evidence-Based Practice Approach
The evidence-based practice movement has led to higher quality intervention studies being reported in the health sciences literature (see, for example, Mosely et al., 2002), and consequently being available for uptake by practising health professionals. Yet interventions in applied settings need to satisfy more than the methodologically-based criteria associated with being categorised as a 'well-established treatment' (Chambless et al., 1996). Some of these additional criteria were recently described by King and Ollendick (2007). The current article extends these criteria so as to include attributes of interventions that (ideally) are required when designing or delivering services within rehabilitation settings.