范式丢失:荷兰困境

IF 2.7 Q1 Social Sciences
M. Punch, B. Hoogenboom, T. Williamson
{"title":"范式丢失:荷兰困境","authors":"M. Punch, B. Hoogenboom, T. Williamson","doi":"10.1375/acri.38.2.268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In the 1970s the Dutch police developed a paradigm of policing that married ideas from the United States on community-oriented policing to a strongly social and democratic role for the police in society. From the early 1990s there was a gradual shift to the right in Dutch society that was reflected in concerns about crime and safety. The paradigm came under scrutiny. Then Dutch officers began to visit New York in considerable numbers and returned with ideas on ‘zero tolerance’. This ‘tough’ approach to crime reduction appears to conflict with Dutch ‘tolerance’ in criminal justice. The paper argues that there is reluctance to abandon that original paradigm, ambivalence about the new concepts from abroad but, above all, an inability to develop a new, comprehensive paradigm. This may well be true elsewhere and we assume that modern policing needs to be based on a well-thought paradigm on the police role in society.","PeriodicalId":47198,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology","volume":"38 1","pages":"268 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2005-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1375/acri.38.2.268","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradigm Lost: The Dutch Dilemma\",\"authors\":\"M. Punch, B. Hoogenboom, T. Williamson\",\"doi\":\"10.1375/acri.38.2.268\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In the 1970s the Dutch police developed a paradigm of policing that married ideas from the United States on community-oriented policing to a strongly social and democratic role for the police in society. From the early 1990s there was a gradual shift to the right in Dutch society that was reflected in concerns about crime and safety. The paradigm came under scrutiny. Then Dutch officers began to visit New York in considerable numbers and returned with ideas on ‘zero tolerance’. This ‘tough’ approach to crime reduction appears to conflict with Dutch ‘tolerance’ in criminal justice. The paper argues that there is reluctance to abandon that original paradigm, ambivalence about the new concepts from abroad but, above all, an inability to develop a new, comprehensive paradigm. This may well be true elsewhere and we assume that modern policing needs to be based on a well-thought paradigm on the police role in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47198,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"268 - 281\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1375/acri.38.2.268\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.2.268\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.2.268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

在20世纪70年代,荷兰警方发展了一种警务模式,将美国社区导向警务的思想与警察在社会中的强烈社会和民主作用结合起来。从20世纪90年代初开始,荷兰社会逐渐向右倾斜,这反映在对犯罪和安全的担忧上。这种模式受到了严格审查。随后,荷兰官员开始大量访问纽约,并带回了“零容忍”的理念。这种减少犯罪的“强硬”方法似乎与荷兰在刑事司法方面的“宽容”相冲突。本文认为,中国不愿放弃原有的范式,对来自国外的新概念持矛盾态度,但最重要的是,中国没有能力发展一个新的、全面的范式。这在其他地方可能也是正确的,我们认为现代警务需要建立在一个深思熟虑的关于警察在社会中的角色的范例之上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Paradigm Lost: The Dutch Dilemma
Abstract In the 1970s the Dutch police developed a paradigm of policing that married ideas from the United States on community-oriented policing to a strongly social and democratic role for the police in society. From the early 1990s there was a gradual shift to the right in Dutch society that was reflected in concerns about crime and safety. The paradigm came under scrutiny. Then Dutch officers began to visit New York in considerable numbers and returned with ideas on ‘zero tolerance’. This ‘tough’ approach to crime reduction appears to conflict with Dutch ‘tolerance’ in criminal justice. The paper argues that there is reluctance to abandon that original paradigm, ambivalence about the new concepts from abroad but, above all, an inability to develop a new, comprehensive paradigm. This may well be true elsewhere and we assume that modern policing needs to be based on a well-thought paradigm on the police role in society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For over 30 years, the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology has been presenting a professional eclectic approach to the tertiary field of criminology by promoting quality research and debate on crime and criminal justice. Features of the Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology include: - peer review of all articles - a diversity of theoretical and methodological articles - current ethical and ideological debates - special topic features. Disciplines covered include: - psychology - law - politics - history - sociology - forensic sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信