{"title":"阿尔弗雷德·马歇尔和j·内维尔·凯恩斯论演绎经济学和经济生物学(约1885-1907)","authors":"C. Cristiano","doi":"10.1400/113197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In spite of some disagreement with Neville Keynes on various methodological issues, from the second to the fourth editions of Principles, Marshall referred the reader to Keynes’s The Scope and Method of Political Economy «for a more full and detailed investigation of the subject». As time passed, however, Marshall became increasingly aware that an incorrect interpretation of the hypothetico-deductive method, which he considered to be in itself essential to the statical and «preliminary» stage of economic analysis, was becoming a hindrance to fair reception of his own research programme, aimed at the development of «economic biology».","PeriodicalId":38602,"journal":{"name":"History of Economic Ideas","volume":"17 1","pages":"1000-1024"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alfred Marshall and J. Neville Keynes on Deductive Economics and Economic Biology (ca. 1885-1907)\",\"authors\":\"C. Cristiano\",\"doi\":\"10.1400/113197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In spite of some disagreement with Neville Keynes on various methodological issues, from the second to the fourth editions of Principles, Marshall referred the reader to Keynes’s The Scope and Method of Political Economy «for a more full and detailed investigation of the subject». As time passed, however, Marshall became increasingly aware that an incorrect interpretation of the hypothetico-deductive method, which he considered to be in itself essential to the statical and «preliminary» stage of economic analysis, was becoming a hindrance to fair reception of his own research programme, aimed at the development of «economic biology».\",\"PeriodicalId\":38602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"1000-1024\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"History of Economic Ideas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1400/113197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"History of Economic Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1400/113197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
Alfred Marshall and J. Neville Keynes on Deductive Economics and Economic Biology (ca. 1885-1907)
In spite of some disagreement with Neville Keynes on various methodological issues, from the second to the fourth editions of Principles, Marshall referred the reader to Keynes’s The Scope and Method of Political Economy «for a more full and detailed investigation of the subject». As time passed, however, Marshall became increasingly aware that an incorrect interpretation of the hypothetico-deductive method, which he considered to be in itself essential to the statical and «preliminary» stage of economic analysis, was becoming a hindrance to fair reception of his own research programme, aimed at the development of «economic biology».
期刊介绍:
History of Economic Ideas is a new international series of Quaderni di storia dell''economia politica, a journal founded in 1983 to promote collaboration between scholars who share an historical approach to the major issues, the various "revolutions" which have left their mark on economics and the spread of economic ideas beyond the narrow circle of specialists. History of Economic Ideas rejects the dichotomy between "analysis" and "culture": both aspects are of equal importance for a wider understanding of the subject. In a period such as our own, where paradigms which once seemed unshakeable are now being challenged, a multidisciplinary analysis of the historical development of economics might contribute to shedding light on the issues at the root of current debate. Besides essays and critical surveys, the journal includes archive material and reviews of new books on history of economics. History of Economic Ideas is double-blind peer reviewed.