离题太远了。

Health visitor Pub Date : 2010-08-01 DOI:10.1192/PB.34.8.355

M. King, G. Leavey

{"title":"离题太远了。","authors":"M. King, G. Leavey","doi":"10.1192/PB.34.8.355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It would seem that the basis for Christopher Cook’s objection to our paper is our perspective on Charles Taylor’s theory of the rise of secularity in the modern world.[1][1] In doing so, he provides a skewed analysis of what we were actually saying. Taylor’s work was helpful to us in","PeriodicalId":75899,"journal":{"name":"Health visitor","volume":"64 6 1","pages":"173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/PB.34.8.355","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wide of the mark.\",\"authors\":\"M. King, G. Leavey\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/PB.34.8.355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It would seem that the basis for Christopher Cook’s objection to our paper is our perspective on Charles Taylor’s theory of the rise of secularity in the modern world.[1][1] In doing so, he provides a skewed analysis of what we were actually saying. Taylor’s work was helpful to us in\",\"PeriodicalId\":75899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health visitor\",\"volume\":\"64 6 1\",\"pages\":\"173\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/PB.34.8.355\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health visitor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.34.8.355\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health visitor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/PB.34.8.355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

看来，克里斯托弗·库克反对我们论文的依据，是我们对查尔斯·泰勒关于现代世界世俗主义兴起的理论的看法。在这样做的时候，他对我们实际所说的内容进行了歪曲的分析。泰勒的工作对我们很有帮助

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Wide of the mark.

It would seem that the basis for Christopher Cook’s objection to our paper is our perspective on Charles Taylor’s theory of the rise of secularity in the modern world.[1][1] In doing so, he provides a skewed analysis of what we were actually saying. Taylor’s work was helpful to us in

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Health visitor

自引率

0.00%

发文量