搜寻及救援

IF 1.4 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
H. Kirk
{"title":"搜寻及救援","authors":"H. Kirk","doi":"10.1300/J002v25n03_06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY This paper is a critique of a research program carried out by the Search Institute of Minnesota. The report, “Growing Up Adopted,” was printed and distributed by the organization itself, and accompanied by grandiose media claims. “The Largest Study Ever of Adoptive Families in the United States,” it promised to open new vistas on an old subject. Elegantly turned out, the 1994 report shows sets of data built on questionable research methods resulting in inapplicable if comforting conclusions. At the heart of the report is a section specifically directed to ideas and concepts derived from Kirk's work. It highlights the questionable methodology and misleading conclusions of the report as a whole. Whereas Part I of this critique deals with weaknesses in the Search Institute's current research, Part II looks back to data produced by an earlier research program carried out under the same auspices. A decade ago similar problems as those posed in the current study had been explored there. Not only were si...","PeriodicalId":51527,"journal":{"name":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"1997-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J002v25n03_06","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Search and Rescue\",\"authors\":\"H. Kirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J002v25n03_06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY This paper is a critique of a research program carried out by the Search Institute of Minnesota. The report, “Growing Up Adopted,” was printed and distributed by the organization itself, and accompanied by grandiose media claims. “The Largest Study Ever of Adoptive Families in the United States,” it promised to open new vistas on an old subject. Elegantly turned out, the 1994 report shows sets of data built on questionable research methods resulting in inapplicable if comforting conclusions. At the heart of the report is a section specifically directed to ideas and concepts derived from Kirk's work. It highlights the questionable methodology and misleading conclusions of the report as a whole. Whereas Part I of this critique deals with weaknesses in the Search Institute's current research, Part II looks back to data produced by an earlier research program carried out under the same auspices. A decade ago similar problems as those posed in the current study had been explored there. Not only were si...\",\"PeriodicalId\":51527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"1997-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J002v25n03_06\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v25n03_06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v25n03_06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇论文是对明尼苏达搜索研究所开展的一个研究项目的评论。这份名为《被收养的成长》(Growing Up adoption)的报告是由该组织自己印刷和分发的,并伴随着一些浮夸的媒体声明。“美国有史以来规模最大的收养家庭研究”,它承诺为一个古老的主题开辟新的前景。1994年的报告优雅地显示,建立在有问题的研究方法上的数据集导致了不适用的结论,尽管令人欣慰。报告的核心部分是专门针对柯克工作中产生的想法和概念的部分。它突出了整个报告的可疑方法和误导性结论。这篇评论的第一部分处理了搜索研究所当前研究的弱点,而第二部分则回顾了在同一赞助下进行的早期研究项目所产生的数据。十年前,与当前研究中提出的问题类似的问题也在那里得到了探讨。不仅是我……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Search and Rescue
SUMMARY This paper is a critique of a research program carried out by the Search Institute of Minnesota. The report, “Growing Up Adopted,” was printed and distributed by the organization itself, and accompanied by grandiose media claims. “The Largest Study Ever of Adoptive Families in the United States,” it promised to open new vistas on an old subject. Elegantly turned out, the 1994 report shows sets of data built on questionable research methods resulting in inapplicable if comforting conclusions. At the heart of the report is a section specifically directed to ideas and concepts derived from Kirk's work. It highlights the questionable methodology and misleading conclusions of the report as a whole. Whereas Part I of this critique deals with weaknesses in the Search Institute's current research, Part II looks back to data produced by an earlier research program carried out under the same auspices. A decade ago similar problems as those posed in the current study had been explored there. Not only were si...
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW
MARRIAGE AND FAMILY REVIEW FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Marriage & Family Review publishes a mix of open submission articles as well as thematic issues that bring together the most current research, practice, advances in theory development, and applications of knowledge on a particular topic in the field. Marriage & Family Review has historically welcomed open submissions from numerous international scholars and will continue to do so. The journal will continue to welcome manuscripts that concern family strengths and premarital relationship development. Another continued emphasis will be research-based manuscripts concerning controversial issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信