青少年、性侵犯与刑法

L. Böllinger
{"title":"青少年、性侵犯与刑法","authors":"L. Böllinger","doi":"10.1300/J056v16n02_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY Criminal law and criminal policy history is perceived as an evolution of legitimation: from a morality paradigm before the Seventies of last century to a utilitarian concept of interdisciplinary enlightenment and rationality, and on to a factual paradigm of risk containment, security orientation and mere exclusion since the Nineties. However, in the area of sexual crime, and especially as far as “the protection of minors” is concerned, Western law appears to have undergone an additional paradigm change, namely in reverting to moralistic principles in disregard of scientific insight. This process, for which victimology appears to be the door opener, is reflected in legal doctrine and criminal policy, in law enforcement, in populistic media and politics. This evolutionary process is interpreted as symptomatic for a post-modern trend in the globalised society where sexual behavior on one hand is blatantly and abusively commercialised, and on the other hand, if deviant, represents the psychologically most expedient object of scapegoating and symbolic policy. The article finishes pleading for a return to the ‘project of modernity’ and to interdisciplinary studies rather than morality as a foundation for criminal policy.","PeriodicalId":85015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","volume":"16 1","pages":"104 - 89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v16n02_08","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adolescence, Sexual Aggression and the Criminal Law\",\"authors\":\"L. Böllinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J056v16n02_08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY Criminal law and criminal policy history is perceived as an evolution of legitimation: from a morality paradigm before the Seventies of last century to a utilitarian concept of interdisciplinary enlightenment and rationality, and on to a factual paradigm of risk containment, security orientation and mere exclusion since the Nineties. However, in the area of sexual crime, and especially as far as “the protection of minors” is concerned, Western law appears to have undergone an additional paradigm change, namely in reverting to moralistic principles in disregard of scientific insight. This process, for which victimology appears to be the door opener, is reflected in legal doctrine and criminal policy, in law enforcement, in populistic media and politics. This evolutionary process is interpreted as symptomatic for a post-modern trend in the globalised society where sexual behavior on one hand is blatantly and abusively commercialised, and on the other hand, if deviant, represents the psychologically most expedient object of scapegoating and symbolic policy. The article finishes pleading for a return to the ‘project of modernity’ and to interdisciplinary studies rather than morality as a foundation for criminal policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85015,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of psychology & human sexuality\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J056v16n02_08\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of psychology & human sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v16n02_08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of psychology & human sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J056v16n02_08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

刑法和刑事政策的历史被视为合法化的演变:从上世纪70年代之前的道德范式到跨学科启蒙和理性的功利主义概念,再到90年代以来的风险遏制、安全导向和纯粹排斥的事实范式。然而,在性犯罪领域,特别是就“保护未成年人”而言,西方法律似乎经历了另一种范式变化,即恢复到道德原则,而不顾科学见解。在这个过程中,受害者学似乎是打开大门的人,反映在法律理论和刑事政策、执法、民粹主义媒体和政治中。这一进化过程被解释为全球化社会中后现代趋势的症状,在全球化社会中,性行为一方面被公然和滥用地商业化,另一方面,如果越轨,则代表了心理上最方便的替罪羊和象征性政策的对象。文章最后呼吁回归“现代性计划”和跨学科研究,而不是将道德作为刑事政策的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adolescence, Sexual Aggression and the Criminal Law
SUMMARY Criminal law and criminal policy history is perceived as an evolution of legitimation: from a morality paradigm before the Seventies of last century to a utilitarian concept of interdisciplinary enlightenment and rationality, and on to a factual paradigm of risk containment, security orientation and mere exclusion since the Nineties. However, in the area of sexual crime, and especially as far as “the protection of minors” is concerned, Western law appears to have undergone an additional paradigm change, namely in reverting to moralistic principles in disregard of scientific insight. This process, for which victimology appears to be the door opener, is reflected in legal doctrine and criminal policy, in law enforcement, in populistic media and politics. This evolutionary process is interpreted as symptomatic for a post-modern trend in the globalised society where sexual behavior on one hand is blatantly and abusively commercialised, and on the other hand, if deviant, represents the psychologically most expedient object of scapegoating and symbolic policy. The article finishes pleading for a return to the ‘project of modernity’ and to interdisciplinary studies rather than morality as a foundation for criminal policy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信