日本后现代哲学的历史性转向

IF 0.2 0 PHILOSOPHY
Shaoyang Lin
{"title":"日本后现代哲学的历史性转向","authors":"Shaoyang Lin","doi":"10.1353/jjp.2013.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I will outline and categorize the history of postmodernism in the Japanese context. I will also critically analyze its changes from the perspective of postwar Japanese intellectual history as well as the postwar history of Japanese political philosophy. I will position this new intellectual and philosophical tendency, which has been around for nearly forty years since the late 1970s, in a global context, and I will especially position it within an East Asian perspective, which from my point of view, has been neglected. It also means that I will not only see Japanese postmodernism as the outcome of imported theory, rather, I will attempt to see it in its own historical context. And by outlining the shift of Japanese postmodernism over these forty years, I will also attempt to see the differences and continuities between Japanese modernism and postmodernism, thus attempting to overcome the opposing dichotomy of “modernism versus postmodernism” in the postwar Japanese intellectual context. As my conclusion, I regard the shifts in the history of postmodern philosophy over the past forty years, as a process of its turn to achieve historicity, and I also see it as a kind of localization of new Western thoughts in a modern Japanese context.","PeriodicalId":29679,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Japanese Philosophy","volume":"1 1","pages":"111 - 135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jjp.2013.0006","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japanese Postmodern Philosophy’s Turn to Historicity\",\"authors\":\"Shaoyang Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jjp.2013.0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I will outline and categorize the history of postmodernism in the Japanese context. I will also critically analyze its changes from the perspective of postwar Japanese intellectual history as well as the postwar history of Japanese political philosophy. I will position this new intellectual and philosophical tendency, which has been around for nearly forty years since the late 1970s, in a global context, and I will especially position it within an East Asian perspective, which from my point of view, has been neglected. It also means that I will not only see Japanese postmodernism as the outcome of imported theory, rather, I will attempt to see it in its own historical context. And by outlining the shift of Japanese postmodernism over these forty years, I will also attempt to see the differences and continuities between Japanese modernism and postmodernism, thus attempting to overcome the opposing dichotomy of “modernism versus postmodernism” in the postwar Japanese intellectual context. As my conclusion, I regard the shifts in the history of postmodern philosophy over the past forty years, as a process of its turn to achieve historicity, and I also see it as a kind of localization of new Western thoughts in a modern Japanese context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29679,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Japanese Philosophy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jjp.2013.0006\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Japanese Philosophy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjp.2013.0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Japanese Philosophy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjp.2013.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我将概述和分类日本语境下的后现代主义历史。我还将从战后日本思想史和战后日本政治哲学史的角度批判性地分析其变化。我将把这种自20世纪70年代末以来已经存在了近40年的新的思想和哲学倾向置于全球背景下,我将特别把它置于东亚的视角中,在我看来,东亚的视角一直被忽视。这也意味着,我将不仅仅把日本后现代主义看作是外来理论的产物,相反,我将尝试在其自身的历史背景下看待它。通过概述这四十年来日本后现代主义的转变,我也将试图看到日本现代主义与后现代主义之间的差异和连续性,从而试图克服战后日本知识语境中“现代主义与后现代主义”的对立二分法。作为我的结论,我认为后现代哲学史在过去四十年中的转变,是一个转向历史性的过程,我也认为这是一种西方新思想在现代日本语境中的本土化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Japanese Postmodern Philosophy’s Turn to Historicity
In this paper, I will outline and categorize the history of postmodernism in the Japanese context. I will also critically analyze its changes from the perspective of postwar Japanese intellectual history as well as the postwar history of Japanese political philosophy. I will position this new intellectual and philosophical tendency, which has been around for nearly forty years since the late 1970s, in a global context, and I will especially position it within an East Asian perspective, which from my point of view, has been neglected. It also means that I will not only see Japanese postmodernism as the outcome of imported theory, rather, I will attempt to see it in its own historical context. And by outlining the shift of Japanese postmodernism over these forty years, I will also attempt to see the differences and continuities between Japanese modernism and postmodernism, thus attempting to overcome the opposing dichotomy of “modernism versus postmodernism” in the postwar Japanese intellectual context. As my conclusion, I regard the shifts in the history of postmodern philosophy over the past forty years, as a process of its turn to achieve historicity, and I also see it as a kind of localization of new Western thoughts in a modern Japanese context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信