1900-1947年,法属苏丹“土著法院”判决中的“放弃婚姻住所罪”或殖民刑法的入侵

IF 0.6 Q1 HISTORY
M. Rodet
{"title":"1900-1947年,法属苏丹“土著法院”判决中的“放弃婚姻住所罪”或殖民刑法的入侵","authors":"M. Rodet","doi":"10.1353/FCH.0.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to examine the interplay between customary law, colonial law, and French law through the study of court cases of female desertion in the region of Kayes in French Sudan (now known as Mali) for the period 1900-1947. In 1903, a new colonial legal system was decreed in French West Africa. The new legislation guaranteed that the colonial courts would enforce African customs for African subjects. In order to facilitate control over colonial courts and the application of customary laws, the colonial administration was eager to formalize and unify the content of customary laws. This formalization relied on what the \"traditional power,\" the jurisprudence of colonial courts, and the colonial administration viewed as customary law. This process ultimately led to a kind of \"invention of tradition\" pertaining to family law, which with the help of \"traditional power\" entailed the penalization of female desertion. The colonial and local considerations of power control in the region entailed increasing restrictions over women's mobility. From 1910 onward, wives accused of desertion were increasingly forced by the colonial courts to return to their husbands. If they refused, from 1914, the court started sending them to prison. Both \"traditional power\" and the colonial administration had agreed to declare female desertion as being henceforth a \"customary offence.\"","PeriodicalId":29880,"journal":{"name":"French Colonial History","volume":"10 1","pages":"151 - 169"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FCH.0.0013","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"« Le délit d'abandon de domicile conjugal » ou l'invasion du pénal colonial dans les jugements des « tribunaux indigènes » au Soudan français, 1900-1947\",\"authors\":\"M. Rodet\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/FCH.0.0013\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aims to examine the interplay between customary law, colonial law, and French law through the study of court cases of female desertion in the region of Kayes in French Sudan (now known as Mali) for the period 1900-1947. In 1903, a new colonial legal system was decreed in French West Africa. The new legislation guaranteed that the colonial courts would enforce African customs for African subjects. In order to facilitate control over colonial courts and the application of customary laws, the colonial administration was eager to formalize and unify the content of customary laws. This formalization relied on what the \\\"traditional power,\\\" the jurisprudence of colonial courts, and the colonial administration viewed as customary law. This process ultimately led to a kind of \\\"invention of tradition\\\" pertaining to family law, which with the help of \\\"traditional power\\\" entailed the penalization of female desertion. The colonial and local considerations of power control in the region entailed increasing restrictions over women's mobility. From 1910 onward, wives accused of desertion were increasingly forced by the colonial courts to return to their husbands. If they refused, from 1914, the court started sending them to prison. Both \\\"traditional power\\\" and the colonial administration had agreed to declare female desertion as being henceforth a \\\"customary offence.\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":29880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"French Colonial History\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"151 - 169\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/FCH.0.0013\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"French Colonial History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/FCH.0.0013\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"French Colonial History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/FCH.0.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在通过对1900-1947年法属苏丹(现称马里)凯耶地区女性遗弃案件的研究,研究习惯法、殖民法和法国法之间的相互作用。1903年,法属西非颁布了新的殖民法律体系。新的立法保证殖民地法院将为非洲臣民执行非洲习俗。为了便于对殖民地法院的控制和习惯法的适用,殖民地行政当局急于将习惯法的内容正规化和统一。这种形式化依赖于“传统权力”、殖民地法院的法理学和殖民地行政当局所认为的习惯法。这一过程最终导致了一种与家庭法有关的“传统的发明”,它在“传统权力”的帮助下,导致了对女性遗弃的惩罚。殖民地和地方对该区域权力控制的考虑导致对妇女流动的限制越来越多。从1910年开始,被控遗弃的妻子越来越多地被殖民地法院强迫回到丈夫身边。如果他们拒绝,从1914年开始,法院就会把他们送进监狱。“传统权力”和殖民政府都同意宣布女性遗弃从此成为一种“习惯性罪行”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
« Le délit d'abandon de domicile conjugal » ou l'invasion du pénal colonial dans les jugements des « tribunaux indigènes » au Soudan français, 1900-1947
This article aims to examine the interplay between customary law, colonial law, and French law through the study of court cases of female desertion in the region of Kayes in French Sudan (now known as Mali) for the period 1900-1947. In 1903, a new colonial legal system was decreed in French West Africa. The new legislation guaranteed that the colonial courts would enforce African customs for African subjects. In order to facilitate control over colonial courts and the application of customary laws, the colonial administration was eager to formalize and unify the content of customary laws. This formalization relied on what the "traditional power," the jurisprudence of colonial courts, and the colonial administration viewed as customary law. This process ultimately led to a kind of "invention of tradition" pertaining to family law, which with the help of "traditional power" entailed the penalization of female desertion. The colonial and local considerations of power control in the region entailed increasing restrictions over women's mobility. From 1910 onward, wives accused of desertion were increasingly forced by the colonial courts to return to their husbands. If they refused, from 1914, the court started sending them to prison. Both "traditional power" and the colonial administration had agreed to declare female desertion as being henceforth a "customary offence."
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信