穆齐奥的《Ca’Brütta》和塞利奥的第四本书。L’invenzione del linguaggio/穆齐奥的Ca’Brütta和Serlio的第四本书。语言的发明

IF 0.1 N/A ARCHITECTURE
Francesco Primari
{"title":"穆齐奥的《Ca’Brütta》和塞利奥的第四本书。L’invenzione del linguaggio/穆齐奥的Ca’Brütta和Serlio的第四本书。语言的发明","authors":"Francesco Primari","doi":"10.12838/ISSN.20390491/N39.2017/2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Il saggio tenta in maniera inedita di rintracciare le fonti trattatistiche della figurazione muziana, evidenziando il ruolo dell’opera di Sebastiano Serlio come punto di partenza per una operativa ricomposizione del linguaggio architettonico. La grammatica e sintassi serliana del IV libro dell’architettura è analizzata come sorgente delle soluzioni attuate nella Ca’ Brütta, definendone l’autenticità e profondità della sua genealogia ed assieme la prospettiva di lungo termine della sua eredità. Osteggiata, poi esaltata, mitizzata e al tempo stesso dimenticata, la Ca’ Brütta, opera prima di Giovanni Muzio a Milano, ha subito alterne fortune, senza tuttavia costituire un vero oggetto di indagine, ma piuttosto una cartina di tornasole sull’esausta e vacua dialettica tra modernità e tradizione. Questo breve saggio tenta di rintracciare i materiali figurativi da cui il suo discorso architettonico si sviluppa, tentando di specificare l’origine di quegli “elementi nostrani classicheggianti dal 500 all’800” che lo stesso Muzio nel 1922 individuava come attori della composizione della Ca’ Brütta;1 da un lato per ridimensionarne la componente metafisica, ironica e straniante attribuitale dalla critica; dall’altro, in opposizione a tale lettura, per evidenziare il carattere realisticamente operativo di un’analogica anastilosi del codice linguistico inverato nei grandi trattati dell’architettura rinascimentale, che Muzio propone come base su cui rifondare il diTHE CA' BRÜTTA OF MUZIO AND BOOK IV OF SERLIO. THE INVENTION OF LANGUAGE Abstract This essay attempts, in a fresh way, to trace the treatises behind Muzio’s figuration, highlighting the role of Sebastiano Serlio’s work as a departure point for an operational recomposition of architectural language. Serlio’s grammar and syntax in Book IV of his \"Treatise on Architecture\" is analysed as a source of the solutions adopted for Ca’ Brütta, defining the authenticity and depth of its genealogy together with a long-term view of its legacy.This essay attempts, in a fresh way, to trace the treatises behind Muzio’s figuration, highlighting the role of Sebastiano Serlio’s work as a departure point for an operational recomposition of architectural language. Serlio’s grammar and syntax in Book IV of his \"Treatise on Architecture\" is analysed as a source of the solutions adopted for Ca’ Brütta, defining the authenticity and depth of its genealogy together with a long-term view of its legacy. Opposed then exalted, idealized at the same time as being forgotten, Ca’ Brütta, Giovanni Muzio’s first work in Milan, has seen its ups and down, without however ever being properly appraised, but it has been a touchstone in the worn-out vacuous dialect between modernity and tradition. This short essay will attempt to trace the figurative materials its architectural discourse developed from, trying to specify the origin of “our own classicalstyle elements from the 1500s to the 1800s” which Muzio himself identified in 1922 as actors in the composition of Ca’ Brütta;1 on the one hand to play down the metaphysical, ironic and estranging components attributed to it by the critics; on the other, in opposition to this interpretation, to highlight the realistically operational character of an analogical anastylosis of the linguistic code verified in the major treatises of Renaissance architecture, which Muzio proposed as a base on which to reDOI: 10.12838/issn.20390491/n39.2017/2","PeriodicalId":37298,"journal":{"name":"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La Ca' Brütta di Muzio e il IV libro del Serlio. L’invenzione del linguaggio / The Ca' Brütta of Muzio and Book IV of Serlio. The Invention of Language\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Primari\",\"doi\":\"10.12838/ISSN.20390491/N39.2017/2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Il saggio tenta in maniera inedita di rintracciare le fonti trattatistiche della figurazione muziana, evidenziando il ruolo dell’opera di Sebastiano Serlio come punto di partenza per una operativa ricomposizione del linguaggio architettonico. La grammatica e sintassi serliana del IV libro dell’architettura è analizzata come sorgente delle soluzioni attuate nella Ca’ Brütta, definendone l’autenticità e profondità della sua genealogia ed assieme la prospettiva di lungo termine della sua eredità. Osteggiata, poi esaltata, mitizzata e al tempo stesso dimenticata, la Ca’ Brütta, opera prima di Giovanni Muzio a Milano, ha subito alterne fortune, senza tuttavia costituire un vero oggetto di indagine, ma piuttosto una cartina di tornasole sull’esausta e vacua dialettica tra modernità e tradizione. Questo breve saggio tenta di rintracciare i materiali figurativi da cui il suo discorso architettonico si sviluppa, tentando di specificare l’origine di quegli “elementi nostrani classicheggianti dal 500 all’800” che lo stesso Muzio nel 1922 individuava come attori della composizione della Ca’ Brütta;1 da un lato per ridimensionarne la componente metafisica, ironica e straniante attribuitale dalla critica; dall’altro, in opposizione a tale lettura, per evidenziare il carattere realisticamente operativo di un’analogica anastilosi del codice linguistico inverato nei grandi trattati dell’architettura rinascimentale, che Muzio propone come base su cui rifondare il diTHE CA' BRÜTTA OF MUZIO AND BOOK IV OF SERLIO. THE INVENTION OF LANGUAGE Abstract This essay attempts, in a fresh way, to trace the treatises behind Muzio’s figuration, highlighting the role of Sebastiano Serlio’s work as a departure point for an operational recomposition of architectural language. Serlio’s grammar and syntax in Book IV of his \\\"Treatise on Architecture\\\" is analysed as a source of the solutions adopted for Ca’ Brütta, defining the authenticity and depth of its genealogy together with a long-term view of its legacy.This essay attempts, in a fresh way, to trace the treatises behind Muzio’s figuration, highlighting the role of Sebastiano Serlio’s work as a departure point for an operational recomposition of architectural language. Serlio’s grammar and syntax in Book IV of his \\\"Treatise on Architecture\\\" is analysed as a source of the solutions adopted for Ca’ Brütta, defining the authenticity and depth of its genealogy together with a long-term view of its legacy. Opposed then exalted, idealized at the same time as being forgotten, Ca’ Brütta, Giovanni Muzio’s first work in Milan, has seen its ups and down, without however ever being properly appraised, but it has been a touchstone in the worn-out vacuous dialect between modernity and tradition. This short essay will attempt to trace the figurative materials its architectural discourse developed from, trying to specify the origin of “our own classicalstyle elements from the 1500s to the 1800s” which Muzio himself identified in 1922 as actors in the composition of Ca’ Brütta;1 on the one hand to play down the metaphysical, ironic and estranging components attributed to it by the critics; on the other, in opposition to this interpretation, to highlight the realistically operational character of an analogical anastylosis of the linguistic code verified in the major treatises of Renaissance architecture, which Muzio proposed as a base on which to reDOI: 10.12838/issn.20390491/n39.2017/2\",\"PeriodicalId\":37298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12838/ISSN.20390491/N39.2017/2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12838/ISSN.20390491/N39.2017/2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章以一种前所未有的方式试图找到muziana象形文字的处理来源,强调Sebastiano Serlio的作品作为建筑语言可操作重组的起点的作用。建筑四本书的语法和句法serliana是ca ' Brü分析所执行的解决办法的源之间,确定其真实性和探究的深度和他的长期前景的遗产。反对,然后兴奋,同时mitizzata和被遗忘,ca ' Brü之间,在约翰·米兰Muzio之前,命运发生了变化,但却没有建立一个真正调查的对象,而是一种试金石sull’esausta和空洞的传统与现代之间的辩证法。这一简短的明智试图追踪估算材料的建筑正在演讲,试图说明罗马“内容生产商classicheggianti all’800 500年的来源”,同样作为演员的1922年Muzio确定了ca ' Brü特派员的组成;另一方面,以削弱形而上学,讽刺和批评的straniante组成部分;反对这一读,另一方面,为了强调现实un’analogica业务性质anastilosi语言代码以上在大型文艺复兴时期建筑条约,Muzio建议,作为重建的基础,ca ' BRÜdiTHE TTA OF Muzio AND书籍IV OF SERLIO。语言的发明,以一种新的方式,跟踪muzi背后的形象,突出了Sebastiano serlios的作用,作为建筑语言操作重构的一个部门点。Serlio’s文法和syntax书籍IV of裙子“Treatise on建筑”is克利as a source of the solutions, for ca ' Brü之间,其定义authenticity》和depth of genealogy together with长期view of its照片。这是一种新的方式,以跟踪muzio的形象背后的处理,突出Sebastiano serlios的作用,作为建筑语言操作重构的一个部门点。Serlio’s文法和syntax书籍IV of裙子“Treatise on建筑”is克利as a source of the solutions, for ca ' Brü之间,其定义authenticity》和depth of genealogy together with长期view of its照片。Opposed then exalted, idealized at the time as being对被触发,ca ' Brü约翰·Muzio’s its first work在米兰,目前的ups和down without however,曾经being properly appraised, but it目前在举办的the worn-out modernity之间的vacuous遗忘和弱视。这简短的essay will attempt to trace the其视觉材料建筑discourse developed from trying to specify the origin of our“classicalstyle经营商元素from the 1500s to the 1800s”该Muzio himself在1922年as rss identified the composition of触发ca ' Brü;1 on the one hand to play down the metaphysical, ironic and estranging部件attributed to it by the critics;另一方面,反对这种解释,强调在文艺复兴建筑的主要处理中测试的语言代码的真实操作特性,其中Muzio proposed是基于对reDOI的引用:10.12838/issn 20390491/n39.2017/2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La Ca' Brütta di Muzio e il IV libro del Serlio. L’invenzione del linguaggio / The Ca' Brütta of Muzio and Book IV of Serlio. The Invention of Language
Il saggio tenta in maniera inedita di rintracciare le fonti trattatistiche della figurazione muziana, evidenziando il ruolo dell’opera di Sebastiano Serlio come punto di partenza per una operativa ricomposizione del linguaggio architettonico. La grammatica e sintassi serliana del IV libro dell’architettura è analizzata come sorgente delle soluzioni attuate nella Ca’ Brütta, definendone l’autenticità e profondità della sua genealogia ed assieme la prospettiva di lungo termine della sua eredità. Osteggiata, poi esaltata, mitizzata e al tempo stesso dimenticata, la Ca’ Brütta, opera prima di Giovanni Muzio a Milano, ha subito alterne fortune, senza tuttavia costituire un vero oggetto di indagine, ma piuttosto una cartina di tornasole sull’esausta e vacua dialettica tra modernità e tradizione. Questo breve saggio tenta di rintracciare i materiali figurativi da cui il suo discorso architettonico si sviluppa, tentando di specificare l’origine di quegli “elementi nostrani classicheggianti dal 500 all’800” che lo stesso Muzio nel 1922 individuava come attori della composizione della Ca’ Brütta;1 da un lato per ridimensionarne la componente metafisica, ironica e straniante attribuitale dalla critica; dall’altro, in opposizione a tale lettura, per evidenziare il carattere realisticamente operativo di un’analogica anastilosi del codice linguistico inverato nei grandi trattati dell’architettura rinascimentale, che Muzio propone come base su cui rifondare il diTHE CA' BRÜTTA OF MUZIO AND BOOK IV OF SERLIO. THE INVENTION OF LANGUAGE Abstract This essay attempts, in a fresh way, to trace the treatises behind Muzio’s figuration, highlighting the role of Sebastiano Serlio’s work as a departure point for an operational recomposition of architectural language. Serlio’s grammar and syntax in Book IV of his "Treatise on Architecture" is analysed as a source of the solutions adopted for Ca’ Brütta, defining the authenticity and depth of its genealogy together with a long-term view of its legacy.This essay attempts, in a fresh way, to trace the treatises behind Muzio’s figuration, highlighting the role of Sebastiano Serlio’s work as a departure point for an operational recomposition of architectural language. Serlio’s grammar and syntax in Book IV of his "Treatise on Architecture" is analysed as a source of the solutions adopted for Ca’ Brütta, defining the authenticity and depth of its genealogy together with a long-term view of its legacy. Opposed then exalted, idealized at the same time as being forgotten, Ca’ Brütta, Giovanni Muzio’s first work in Milan, has seen its ups and down, without however ever being properly appraised, but it has been a touchstone in the worn-out vacuous dialect between modernity and tradition. This short essay will attempt to trace the figurative materials its architectural discourse developed from, trying to specify the origin of “our own classicalstyle elements from the 1500s to the 1800s” which Muzio himself identified in 1922 as actors in the composition of Ca’ Brütta;1 on the one hand to play down the metaphysical, ironic and estranging components attributed to it by the critics; on the other, in opposition to this interpretation, to highlight the realistically operational character of an analogical anastylosis of the linguistic code verified in the major treatises of Renaissance architecture, which Muzio proposed as a base on which to reDOI: 10.12838/issn.20390491/n39.2017/2
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Festival dell''Architettura Magazine
Festival dell''Architettura Magazine Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信