情况和我们的训练

IF 0.1 0 ARCHITECTURE
Elvio Manganaro
{"title":"情况和我们的训练","authors":"Elvio Manganaro","doi":"10.1283/FAM/ISSN2039-0491/N38-2016/24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Is it possible to apply strategies of formal decomposition to the figurative patrimony left in heritage by the generation of Canella, Rossi, Aymonino, Semerani and companions? Or better, isn’t it the only way accessible, after acknowledging that the historical and dialectical conditions in which those architectures and their authors took place can’t be repeated? And even, are we sure that certain figures, taken away from their natural environment and reput in circulation, still don’t preserve something of their original meaning? And how much? Therefore, it’s only by the “historical” betrayal of their world that today it’s possible to release the formal and semantic values, that instead, for their nature, benefit of several lives. Maybe, for does who loved certain forms, it’s the only work to do.","PeriodicalId":37298,"journal":{"name":"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lo stato delle cose e la nostra formazione\",\"authors\":\"Elvio Manganaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1283/FAM/ISSN2039-0491/N38-2016/24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Is it possible to apply strategies of formal decomposition to the figurative patrimony left in heritage by the generation of Canella, Rossi, Aymonino, Semerani and companions? Or better, isn’t it the only way accessible, after acknowledging that the historical and dialectical conditions in which those architectures and their authors took place can’t be repeated? And even, are we sure that certain figures, taken away from their natural environment and reput in circulation, still don’t preserve something of their original meaning? And how much? Therefore, it’s only by the “historical” betrayal of their world that today it’s possible to release the formal and semantic values, that instead, for their nature, benefit of several lives. Maybe, for does who loved certain forms, it’s the only work to do.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37298,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1283/FAM/ISSN2039-0491/N38-2016/24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Festival dell''Architettura Magazine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1283/FAM/ISSN2039-0491/N38-2016/24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

是否有可能将形式分解的策略应用于Canella、Rossi、Aymonino、Semerani和同伴们在遗产中留下的象征性遗产?或者更好的是,在承认这些建筑及其作者所处的历史和辩证条件不能重复之后,这难道不是唯一的途径吗?甚至,我们能肯定,某些人物,离开他们的自然环境,重新投入流通,仍然没有保留他们的原始意义吗?多少钱?因此,只有通过对他们的世界的“历史”背叛,今天才有可能释放形式和语义价值,而不是为了他们的本质而造福于几个生命。也许,对于喜欢某些形式的人来说,这是唯一要做的工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lo stato delle cose e la nostra formazione
Is it possible to apply strategies of formal decomposition to the figurative patrimony left in heritage by the generation of Canella, Rossi, Aymonino, Semerani and companions? Or better, isn’t it the only way accessible, after acknowledging that the historical and dialectical conditions in which those architectures and their authors took place can’t be repeated? And even, are we sure that certain figures, taken away from their natural environment and reput in circulation, still don’t preserve something of their original meaning? And how much? Therefore, it’s only by the “historical” betrayal of their world that today it’s possible to release the formal and semantic values, that instead, for their nature, benefit of several lives. Maybe, for does who loved certain forms, it’s the only work to do.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Festival dell''Architettura Magazine
Festival dell''Architettura Magazine Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信