对捐赠者受孕家庭的看法:对教师观点的调查研究

IF 1.1 3区社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES

Families Relationships and Societies Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1332/204674319x15717233029824

A. Indekeu, C. Lampic

{"title":"对捐赠者受孕家庭的看法:对教师观点的调查研究","authors":"A. Indekeu, C. Lampic","doi":"10.1332/204674319x15717233029824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research regarding donor-conceived families has mainly focused on processes within the family unit. Research on social factors affecting the family from outside is rare. Focusing on individuals’ difficulties without acknowledging external social factors is, however, misleading when the subjects studied belong to a stigmatised group. As openness about donor conception is increasingly encouraged, donor-conceived families will interact more with their social networks. Yet uncertainty around the societal perceptions of their family building, alongside fear of stigma, can make parents insecure about disclosure. This survey study assessed awareness, knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding donor-conceived families among 151 Belgian and 67 Swedish school teachers. Teachers had a basic awareness of donor-conceived families, yet limited understanding of the implications of donor conception for the families. While an open attitude towards donor-conceived families existed, the value of privacy affected interactions. Differences were observed in relation to the different forms of donor-conceived families. Implications for practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":45141,"journal":{"name":"Families Relationships and Societies","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of donor-conceived families: a survey study on the perspectives of teachers\",\"authors\":\"A. Indekeu, C. Lampic\",\"doi\":\"10.1332/204674319x15717233029824\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research regarding donor-conceived families has mainly focused on processes within the family unit. Research on social factors affecting the family from outside is rare. Focusing on individuals’ difficulties without acknowledging external social factors is, however, misleading when the subjects studied belong to a stigmatised group. As openness about donor conception is increasingly encouraged, donor-conceived families will interact more with their social networks. Yet uncertainty around the societal perceptions of their family building, alongside fear of stigma, can make parents insecure about disclosure. This survey study assessed awareness, knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding donor-conceived families among 151 Belgian and 67 Swedish school teachers. Teachers had a basic awareness of donor-conceived families, yet limited understanding of the implications of donor conception for the families. While an open attitude towards donor-conceived families existed, the value of privacy affected interactions. Differences were observed in relation to the different forms of donor-conceived families. Implications for practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45141,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Families Relationships and Societies\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Families Relationships and Societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1332/204674319x15717233029824\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Relationships and Societies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1332/204674319x15717233029824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于捐助者受孕家庭的研究主要集中在家庭单位内的过程。从外部对影响家庭的社会因素的研究很少。然而，当研究对象属于一个被污名化的群体时，只关注个人的困难而不承认外部社会因素是有误导性的。随着捐赠受孕的公开性越来越受到鼓励，捐赠受孕的家庭将更多地与他们的社交网络互动。然而，社会对其家庭建设看法的不确定性，加上对耻辱的恐惧，可能使父母对披露信息感到不安。这项调查研究评估了151名比利时和67名瑞典学校教师对捐赠者怀孕家庭的认识、知识、态度和行为。教师对供体受孕家庭有基本认识，但对供体受孕对家庭的影响了解有限。虽然对捐助者受孕的家庭持开放态度，但隐私的价值影响了互动。在不同形式的供体受孕家庭中观察到差异。讨论了对实践的启示。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Perceptions of donor-conceived families: a survey study on the perspectives of teachers

Research regarding donor-conceived families has mainly focused on processes within the family unit. Research on social factors affecting the family from outside is rare. Focusing on individuals’ difficulties without acknowledging external social factors is, however, misleading when the subjects studied belong to a stigmatised group. As openness about donor conception is increasingly encouraged, donor-conceived families will interact more with their social networks. Yet uncertainty around the societal perceptions of their family building, alongside fear of stigma, can make parents insecure about disclosure. This survey study assessed awareness, knowledge, attitudes and behaviour regarding donor-conceived families among 151 Belgian and 67 Swedish school teachers. Teachers had a basic awareness of donor-conceived families, yet limited understanding of the implications of donor conception for the families. While an open attitude towards donor-conceived families existed, the value of privacy affected interactions. Differences were observed in relation to the different forms of donor-conceived families. Implications for practice are discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Families Relationships and Societies FAMILY STUDIES-

CiteScore

2.10

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Families, Relationships and Societies (FRS) is a vibrant social science journal advancing scholarship and debates in the field of families and relationships. It explores family life, relationships and generational issues across the life course. Bringing together a range of social science perspectives, with a strong policy and practice focus, it is also strongly informed by sociological theory and the latest methodological approaches. The title ''Families, Relationships and Societies'' encompasses the fluidity, complexity and diversity of contemporary social and personal relationships and their need to be understood in the context of different societies and cultures. International and comprehensive in scope, FRS covers a range of theoretical, methodological and substantive issues, from large scale trends, processes of social change and social inequality to the intricacies of family practices. It welcomes scholarship based on theoretical, qualitative or quantitative analysis. High quality research and scholarship is accepted across a wide range of issues. Examples include family policy, changing relationships between personal life, work and employment, shifting meanings of parenting, issues of care and intimacy, the emergence of digital friendship, shifts in transnational sexual relationships, effects of globalising and individualising forces and the expansion of alternative ways of doing family. Encouraging methodological innovation, and seeking to present work on all stages of the life course, the journal welcomes explorations of relationships and families in all their different guises and across different societies.