托马斯·霍布斯与政治世俗主义:一种批判的参与

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Pınar Kemerli
{"title":"托马斯·霍布斯与政治世俗主义:一种批判的参与","authors":"Pınar Kemerli","doi":"10.1353/lit.2021.0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Scholars of early modern toleration are divided about Hobbes’s role in the development of modern secularism. Much of this debate focuses on whether we should see Hobbes as a modest defender or enemy of toleration, while often neglecting an engagement with critical secularism studies inaugurated by Talal Asad’s work. Bringing the insights provided by these new perspectives on secular power to bear upon the analysis of Hobbes’s position, this article argues that Hobbes’s work in fact includes a poignant early theorization of secular power that anticipates the operations and tensions of political secularism more accurately than more normatively-inclined early modern theories of toleration. Hobbes’s arguments on this topic are developed in the course of the evolution of his thinking on military duties from Leviathan to Behemoth, culminating in a distinct model of religious reconstruction. Situating this model at the center of Hobbes’s contributions to the development of political secularism, the article thus makes a case for the value of cultivating more robust disciplinary interactions between histories of political thought and critical analysis of secular power.","PeriodicalId":44728,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","volume":"48 1","pages":"1002 - 977"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thomas Hobbes and Political Secularism: A Critical Engagement\",\"authors\":\"Pınar Kemerli\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/lit.2021.0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Scholars of early modern toleration are divided about Hobbes’s role in the development of modern secularism. Much of this debate focuses on whether we should see Hobbes as a modest defender or enemy of toleration, while often neglecting an engagement with critical secularism studies inaugurated by Talal Asad’s work. Bringing the insights provided by these new perspectives on secular power to bear upon the analysis of Hobbes’s position, this article argues that Hobbes’s work in fact includes a poignant early theorization of secular power that anticipates the operations and tensions of political secularism more accurately than more normatively-inclined early modern theories of toleration. Hobbes’s arguments on this topic are developed in the course of the evolution of his thinking on military duties from Leviathan to Behemoth, culminating in a distinct model of religious reconstruction. Situating this model at the center of Hobbes’s contributions to the development of political secularism, the article thus makes a case for the value of cultivating more robust disciplinary interactions between histories of political thought and critical analysis of secular power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COLLEGE LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"1002 - 977\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COLLEGE LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2021.0027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2021.0027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:研究早期现代宽容的学者对霍布斯在现代世俗主义发展中的作用存在分歧。这些争论主要集中在我们是否应该将霍布斯视为宽容的温和捍卫者或敌人,而往往忽略了Talal Asad的著作开创的批判性世俗主义研究。将这些关于世俗权力的新观点所提供的见解运用到对霍布斯立场的分析中,本文认为,霍布斯的著作实际上包含了一个关于世俗权力的尖锐的早期理论,它比更倾向于规范的早期现代宽容理论更准确地预测了政治世俗主义的运作和紧张关系。霍布斯关于这一主题的论述是在他从利维坦到巨兽的军事义务思想演变过程中发展起来的,最终形成了一种独特的宗教重建模式。这篇文章将这种模式置于霍布斯对政治世俗主义发展的贡献的中心,从而证明了在政治思想史和世俗权力的批判性分析之间培养更强大的学科互动的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thomas Hobbes and Political Secularism: A Critical Engagement
Abstract:Scholars of early modern toleration are divided about Hobbes’s role in the development of modern secularism. Much of this debate focuses on whether we should see Hobbes as a modest defender or enemy of toleration, while often neglecting an engagement with critical secularism studies inaugurated by Talal Asad’s work. Bringing the insights provided by these new perspectives on secular power to bear upon the analysis of Hobbes’s position, this article argues that Hobbes’s work in fact includes a poignant early theorization of secular power that anticipates the operations and tensions of political secularism more accurately than more normatively-inclined early modern theories of toleration. Hobbes’s arguments on this topic are developed in the course of the evolution of his thinking on military duties from Leviathan to Behemoth, culminating in a distinct model of religious reconstruction. Situating this model at the center of Hobbes’s contributions to the development of political secularism, the article thus makes a case for the value of cultivating more robust disciplinary interactions between histories of political thought and critical analysis of secular power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COLLEGE LITERATURE
COLLEGE LITERATURE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信