{"title":"来自编辑","authors":"A. Bell","doi":"10.1353/ect.2019.0028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The City God temples 城隍廟 occupied a particular place in the socio-religious organization of late imperial China. They were state-mandated shrines under the control of local officials, but also housed a large variety of local religious organizations. There was cooperation between such organizations in staging festivals, but also tensions about control over temple resources and management. These tensions evolved during the late Qing and the Republican period, as political and social change empowered certain actors and weakened others, thus affecting temple life and activities. The article first presents the various actors that played a role in managing and running a City God temple, what type of religiosity they invested in it, and how they shared its space. It then examines two moments of change in this sharing of the common temple space, namely the post-Taiping reorganization of local society, and the post-1898 policies to build a nation-state.","PeriodicalId":53120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Religions","volume":"14 1","pages":"5 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ect.2019.0028","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the Editor\",\"authors\":\"A. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/ect.2019.0028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The City God temples 城隍廟 occupied a particular place in the socio-religious organization of late imperial China. They were state-mandated shrines under the control of local officials, but also housed a large variety of local religious organizations. There was cooperation between such organizations in staging festivals, but also tensions about control over temple resources and management. These tensions evolved during the late Qing and the Republican period, as political and social change empowered certain actors and weakened others, thus affecting temple life and activities. The article first presents the various actors that played a role in managing and running a City God temple, what type of religiosity they invested in it, and how they shared its space. It then examines two moments of change in this sharing of the common temple space, namely the post-Taiping reorganization of local society, and the post-1898 policies to build a nation-state.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Religions\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"5 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/ect.2019.0028\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/ect.2019.0028\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ect.2019.0028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract:The City God temples 城隍廟 occupied a particular place in the socio-religious organization of late imperial China. They were state-mandated shrines under the control of local officials, but also housed a large variety of local religious organizations. There was cooperation between such organizations in staging festivals, but also tensions about control over temple resources and management. These tensions evolved during the late Qing and the Republican period, as political and social change empowered certain actors and weakened others, thus affecting temple life and activities. The article first presents the various actors that played a role in managing and running a City God temple, what type of religiosity they invested in it, and how they shared its space. It then examines two moments of change in this sharing of the common temple space, namely the post-Taiping reorganization of local society, and the post-1898 policies to build a nation-state.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chinese Religions is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published under the auspices of the Society for the Study of Chinese Religions (SSCR). Since its founding, the Journal has provided a forum for studies in Chinese religions from a great variety of disciplinary perspectives, including religious studies, philology, history, art history, anthropology, sociology, political science, archaeology, and literary studies. The Journal welcomes original research articles, shorter research notes, essays, and field reports on all aspects of Chinese religions in all historical periods. All submissions need to undergo double-blind peer review before they can be accepted for publication.