在现实世界中写作

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
LEGACY Pub Date : 2008-06-01 DOI:10.1353/LEG.0.0045
Karen L. Kilcup
{"title":"在现实世界中写作","authors":"Karen L. Kilcup","doi":"10.1353/LEG.0.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When Hillary Clinton encountered a heckler's sign, \"Iron My Shirt,\" at a January 2008 campaign rally, she could easily have responded with Anne Bradstreet's complaint from 350 years ago: \"I am obnoxious to each carping tongue / Who says my hand a needle better fits\" (25-26). Substitute \"iron\" for \"needle\" and the observation remains essentially unchanged. The question of women's appropriate \"domestication,\" far from being settled, still provokes anxiety, anger, and arguments. Women's place--in the home, in American society, in the world--figures explicitly or implicitly in many important contemporary conversations; for example, whether one supported Hillary Clinton or another candidate, the recent presidential campaign exposed the powerful vestiges of separate spheres ideology. How could a woman, who should have her hand on the toaster, touch the button that could end the world? (1) As we approach the fourth conference of the Society for the Study of American Women Writers, our last meeting seems a world away. In 2006, nearly 450 participants, from almost every state and from several international locations, discussed a wide range of topics. The essays collected in this special issue of Legacy address a number of recurrent concerns among the approximately 350 author- or theme-based presentations: performance, identity, genre, the meaning of home, issues of mentoring, and the concept of \"legacies\"--the relationship between generations of women writers. (2) Most broadly, however, in one way or another all of the essays here tackle the inevitable imbrication of public and private domains. (3) The remarks that follow invert the conventional structuring of introductory essays. First, I will trace some of the continuities among the contributions here represented. I will then widen the circle to meditate on a specific and putatively nonliterary genre, obituary, that occupies a conceptual space between public and private, and, in the case of Susan Gilbert Dickinson's obituary for Emily Dickinson, between prose and poetry. In the final section, I will speak briefly of personal loss, then return to the essays here, pondering how some of the concepts they advance are embodied publicly in the twenty-first century. In the process, I attempt to reflect, more associatively than analytically, on Tanya Ann Kennedy's observation that \"there may be problems with feminists arguing that they are done with a dominant ideology, such as the public/private binary, when it is not done with women\" (2), and her reminder of American women's historical intervention into debates about \"civilization [and] citizenship\" (8). What place does our work--which includes both the texts that we study and those that we write--have in the world? ENVISIONING CITIZENS, AT HOME AND ABROAD In the 2008 presidential campaign primaries, candidates were scrutinized for both their \"presidential\" (\"public\") and their \"human\" (\"private\") qualities. Hillary Clinton appeared close to tears in response to a New Hampshire voter's question about her (public) private life: \"How ... did you get out the door every day? I mean, as a woman, I know how hard it is to get out of the house and get ready\" (Breslau). Immediately, newspapers and blogs across the world, as well as voters in their living rooms, asked, Did Hillary cry on purpose? (4) American women appearing in public roles have often elicited a cloud of problematic questions about authenticity and selfhood as well as respectability. (5) Native American women such as Zitkala-Sa have offered particularly provocative challenges to gendered and racialized norms. Zitkala-Sa's life-writing and her complex construction of identity--especially via her variegated rhetorical strategies--continue to attract commentary. (6) Of special interest to many scholars of Native American women's writing have been performances of \"Indian-ness.\" Both on stage and in staged photographs, Sarah Winnemucca was adept at re-presenting herself to white audiences as the \"Indian Princess\"; in her performances, Pauline Johnson appeared first in \"buckskin\" and then in European evening wear; in the West, Ora Eddleman Reed offered \"Types of Indian Girls\" to readers of Twin Territories, a magazine published in Indian Territory in the late nineteenth century, repudiating stereotypes of Cherokees as savage but also \"playing Indian\" herself. …","PeriodicalId":42944,"journal":{"name":"LEGACY","volume":"10 1","pages":"193 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2008-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LEG.0.0045","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing in the Real World\",\"authors\":\"Karen L. Kilcup\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/LEG.0.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When Hillary Clinton encountered a heckler's sign, \\\"Iron My Shirt,\\\" at a January 2008 campaign rally, she could easily have responded with Anne Bradstreet's complaint from 350 years ago: \\\"I am obnoxious to each carping tongue / Who says my hand a needle better fits\\\" (25-26). Substitute \\\"iron\\\" for \\\"needle\\\" and the observation remains essentially unchanged. The question of women's appropriate \\\"domestication,\\\" far from being settled, still provokes anxiety, anger, and arguments. Women's place--in the home, in American society, in the world--figures explicitly or implicitly in many important contemporary conversations; for example, whether one supported Hillary Clinton or another candidate, the recent presidential campaign exposed the powerful vestiges of separate spheres ideology. How could a woman, who should have her hand on the toaster, touch the button that could end the world? (1) As we approach the fourth conference of the Society for the Study of American Women Writers, our last meeting seems a world away. In 2006, nearly 450 participants, from almost every state and from several international locations, discussed a wide range of topics. The essays collected in this special issue of Legacy address a number of recurrent concerns among the approximately 350 author- or theme-based presentations: performance, identity, genre, the meaning of home, issues of mentoring, and the concept of \\\"legacies\\\"--the relationship between generations of women writers. (2) Most broadly, however, in one way or another all of the essays here tackle the inevitable imbrication of public and private domains. (3) The remarks that follow invert the conventional structuring of introductory essays. First, I will trace some of the continuities among the contributions here represented. I will then widen the circle to meditate on a specific and putatively nonliterary genre, obituary, that occupies a conceptual space between public and private, and, in the case of Susan Gilbert Dickinson's obituary for Emily Dickinson, between prose and poetry. In the final section, I will speak briefly of personal loss, then return to the essays here, pondering how some of the concepts they advance are embodied publicly in the twenty-first century. In the process, I attempt to reflect, more associatively than analytically, on Tanya Ann Kennedy's observation that \\\"there may be problems with feminists arguing that they are done with a dominant ideology, such as the public/private binary, when it is not done with women\\\" (2), and her reminder of American women's historical intervention into debates about \\\"civilization [and] citizenship\\\" (8). What place does our work--which includes both the texts that we study and those that we write--have in the world? ENVISIONING CITIZENS, AT HOME AND ABROAD In the 2008 presidential campaign primaries, candidates were scrutinized for both their \\\"presidential\\\" (\\\"public\\\") and their \\\"human\\\" (\\\"private\\\") qualities. Hillary Clinton appeared close to tears in response to a New Hampshire voter's question about her (public) private life: \\\"How ... did you get out the door every day? I mean, as a woman, I know how hard it is to get out of the house and get ready\\\" (Breslau). Immediately, newspapers and blogs across the world, as well as voters in their living rooms, asked, Did Hillary cry on purpose? (4) American women appearing in public roles have often elicited a cloud of problematic questions about authenticity and selfhood as well as respectability. (5) Native American women such as Zitkala-Sa have offered particularly provocative challenges to gendered and racialized norms. Zitkala-Sa's life-writing and her complex construction of identity--especially via her variegated rhetorical strategies--continue to attract commentary. (6) Of special interest to many scholars of Native American women's writing have been performances of \\\"Indian-ness.\\\" Both on stage and in staged photographs, Sarah Winnemucca was adept at re-presenting herself to white audiences as the \\\"Indian Princess\\\"; in her performances, Pauline Johnson appeared first in \\\"buckskin\\\" and then in European evening wear; in the West, Ora Eddleman Reed offered \\\"Types of Indian Girls\\\" to readers of Twin Territories, a magazine published in Indian Territory in the late nineteenth century, repudiating stereotypes of Cherokees as savage but also \\\"playing Indian\\\" herself. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":42944,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LEGACY\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"193 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/LEG.0.0045\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LEGACY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/LEG.0.0045\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LEGACY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/LEG.0.0045","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

在2008年1月的一次竞选集会上,当希拉里•克林顿(Hillary Clinton)遇到一个诘问者的标语“熨烫我的衬衫”时,她很容易用350年前安妮•布拉德斯特里特(Anne Bradstreet)的抱怨来回应:“每个吹毛求疵的人都讨厌我/谁说我的手比针更合适”(25-26页)。用“铁”代替“针”,观察结果基本不变。妇女适当的“驯化”问题远没有得到解决,仍然引起焦虑、愤怒和争论。女性的地位——在家庭、在美国社会、在世界上——在许多重要的当代对话中或明或暗地出现;例如,无论是支持希拉里·克林顿(Hillary Clinton)还是其他候选人,最近的总统竞选都暴露了不同领域意识形态的强大残余。一个本该把手放在烤面包机上的女人,怎么能碰那个能毁灭世界的按钮呢?随着美国女作家研究协会第四次会议的临近,我们的最后一次会议似乎是另一个世界。2006年,来自几乎每个州和几个国际地点的近450名与会者讨论了广泛的主题。本期《遗产》特刊中收录的文章,在大约350篇以作者或主题为基础的演讲中,探讨了一些反复出现的问题:表现、身份、类型、家的意义、指导问题,以及“遗产”的概念——几代女性作家之间的关系。(2)然而,最广泛地说,这里所有的文章都以这样或那样的方式解决了公共领域和私人领域不可避免的重叠问题。(3)接下来的评论颠覆了导论文章的传统结构。首先,我将追溯这里所代表的贡献之间的一些连续性。然后,我将扩大这个范围,思考一种特定的、假定是非文学的体裁——讣告,它占据了公共和私人之间的概念空间,就苏珊·吉尔伯特·狄金森为艾米丽·狄金森写的讣告而言,它介于散文和诗歌之间。在最后一部分,我将简要地谈谈个人的损失,然后回到这里的文章,思考他们提出的一些概念是如何在21世纪公开体现的。在这个过程中,我试图更多地联想而非分析地反思谭雅·安·肯尼迪(Tanya Ann Kennedy)的观察:“女权主义者可能会有问题,他们认为自己已经摆脱了一种主流意识形态,比如公共/私人二元制,但这种意识形态并没有对女性造成影响”(2)。她提醒我们,美国妇女在历史上介入了关于“文明[和]公民身份”的辩论。我们的工作——包括我们研究的文本和我们写的文本——在世界上有什么地位?在2008年的总统初选中,候选人受到了“总统”(“公众”)和“人性”(“私人”)两方面的严格审查。希拉里·克林顿在回答新罕布什尔州选民关于她的(公共)私人生活的问题时几乎要流泪了:“怎么……你每天都出门吗?我的意思是,作为一个女人,我知道走出家门并做好准备有多难”(布雷斯劳)。世界各地的报纸和博客以及客厅里的选民们立即问道:“希拉里是故意哭的吗?”(4)美国女性出现在公共场合时,常常引发一大堆关于真实、自我和体面的问题。(5)像Zitkala-Sa这样的印第安妇女对性别和种族化的规范提出了特别具有挑衅性的挑战。齐特卡拉-萨的生活写作和她对身份的复杂建构——尤其是通过她多样化的修辞策略——继续吸引着评论。(6)许多研究美洲土著妇女写作的学者特别感兴趣的是“印第安性”的表现。无论是在舞台上还是在舞台照片中,萨拉·温尼穆卡(Sarah Winnemucca)都善于将自己重新呈现给白人观众,成为“印第安公主”;在她的表演中,波琳·约翰逊(Pauline Johnson)先是穿着“鹿皮”,然后是欧洲晚礼服;在西方,奥拉·埃德曼·里德(Ora Eddleman Reed)向《双胞胎领地》(Twin Territories)杂志的读者提供了“印第安女孩的类型”,这是一份19世纪末在印第安领地出版的杂志,她驳斥了切罗基人是野蛮人的刻板印象,但她自己也在“扮演印第安人”。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Writing in the Real World
When Hillary Clinton encountered a heckler's sign, "Iron My Shirt," at a January 2008 campaign rally, she could easily have responded with Anne Bradstreet's complaint from 350 years ago: "I am obnoxious to each carping tongue / Who says my hand a needle better fits" (25-26). Substitute "iron" for "needle" and the observation remains essentially unchanged. The question of women's appropriate "domestication," far from being settled, still provokes anxiety, anger, and arguments. Women's place--in the home, in American society, in the world--figures explicitly or implicitly in many important contemporary conversations; for example, whether one supported Hillary Clinton or another candidate, the recent presidential campaign exposed the powerful vestiges of separate spheres ideology. How could a woman, who should have her hand on the toaster, touch the button that could end the world? (1) As we approach the fourth conference of the Society for the Study of American Women Writers, our last meeting seems a world away. In 2006, nearly 450 participants, from almost every state and from several international locations, discussed a wide range of topics. The essays collected in this special issue of Legacy address a number of recurrent concerns among the approximately 350 author- or theme-based presentations: performance, identity, genre, the meaning of home, issues of mentoring, and the concept of "legacies"--the relationship between generations of women writers. (2) Most broadly, however, in one way or another all of the essays here tackle the inevitable imbrication of public and private domains. (3) The remarks that follow invert the conventional structuring of introductory essays. First, I will trace some of the continuities among the contributions here represented. I will then widen the circle to meditate on a specific and putatively nonliterary genre, obituary, that occupies a conceptual space between public and private, and, in the case of Susan Gilbert Dickinson's obituary for Emily Dickinson, between prose and poetry. In the final section, I will speak briefly of personal loss, then return to the essays here, pondering how some of the concepts they advance are embodied publicly in the twenty-first century. In the process, I attempt to reflect, more associatively than analytically, on Tanya Ann Kennedy's observation that "there may be problems with feminists arguing that they are done with a dominant ideology, such as the public/private binary, when it is not done with women" (2), and her reminder of American women's historical intervention into debates about "civilization [and] citizenship" (8). What place does our work--which includes both the texts that we study and those that we write--have in the world? ENVISIONING CITIZENS, AT HOME AND ABROAD In the 2008 presidential campaign primaries, candidates were scrutinized for both their "presidential" ("public") and their "human" ("private") qualities. Hillary Clinton appeared close to tears in response to a New Hampshire voter's question about her (public) private life: "How ... did you get out the door every day? I mean, as a woman, I know how hard it is to get out of the house and get ready" (Breslau). Immediately, newspapers and blogs across the world, as well as voters in their living rooms, asked, Did Hillary cry on purpose? (4) American women appearing in public roles have often elicited a cloud of problematic questions about authenticity and selfhood as well as respectability. (5) Native American women such as Zitkala-Sa have offered particularly provocative challenges to gendered and racialized norms. Zitkala-Sa's life-writing and her complex construction of identity--especially via her variegated rhetorical strategies--continue to attract commentary. (6) Of special interest to many scholars of Native American women's writing have been performances of "Indian-ness." Both on stage and in staged photographs, Sarah Winnemucca was adept at re-presenting herself to white audiences as the "Indian Princess"; in her performances, Pauline Johnson appeared first in "buckskin" and then in European evening wear; in the West, Ora Eddleman Reed offered "Types of Indian Girls" to readers of Twin Territories, a magazine published in Indian Territory in the late nineteenth century, repudiating stereotypes of Cherokees as savage but also "playing Indian" herself. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LEGACY
LEGACY LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信