20世纪俄罗斯哲学家著作中的欧洲文化危机:奥斯瓦尔德·斯宾格勒的思想

Filosofia Pub Date : 2015-01-01 DOI:10.13135/2704-8195/3902
V. Belov
{"title":"20世纪俄罗斯哲学家著作中的欧洲文化危机:奥斯瓦尔德·斯宾格勒的思想","authors":"V. Belov","doi":"10.13135/2704-8195/3902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper explores the positions of four Russian intellectuals on the work of Oswald Spengler. Fedor Stepun maintains that, despite the dubious originality of his conception, Spengler distinguishes himself for the depth of his reflections on the concept of death, which in his opinion might rekindle religious life. Nikolaj Berdjaev believes that the German thinker succeeds in compensating for the lack of a religious dimension thanks to an in-depth, though somewhat am- biguous, reflection on technique, above all with specific reference to the Russian world. Semen Frank critiques Spengler’s pessimism, out of the belief that moments of crisis unlock further historical development. Matvej Kagan compares and con- trasts Natorp’s position, which is based on infinite variables and is open to the future, with Spengler’s ideas, which are centered on finite structures and look back to the past. The comparison undertaken by the aforementioned authors with Spen- gler’s work has been a major source of progress for Russian philosophical thought, with a view to an ideal harmonization with the European spirit .","PeriodicalId":33594,"journal":{"name":"Filosofia","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"La crisi della cultura europea nelle opere dei filosofi russi del Novecento: a proposito delle idee di Oswald Spengler\",\"authors\":\"V. Belov\",\"doi\":\"10.13135/2704-8195/3902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper explores the positions of four Russian intellectuals on the work of Oswald Spengler. Fedor Stepun maintains that, despite the dubious originality of his conception, Spengler distinguishes himself for the depth of his reflections on the concept of death, which in his opinion might rekindle religious life. Nikolaj Berdjaev believes that the German thinker succeeds in compensating for the lack of a religious dimension thanks to an in-depth, though somewhat am- biguous, reflection on technique, above all with specific reference to the Russian world. Semen Frank critiques Spengler’s pessimism, out of the belief that moments of crisis unlock further historical development. Matvej Kagan compares and con- trasts Natorp’s position, which is based on infinite variables and is open to the future, with Spengler’s ideas, which are centered on finite structures and look back to the past. The comparison undertaken by the aforementioned authors with Spen- gler’s work has been a major source of progress for Russian philosophical thought, with a view to an ideal harmonization with the European spirit .\",\"PeriodicalId\":33594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Filosofia\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Filosofia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/3902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filosofia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13135/2704-8195/3902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了四位俄国知识分子对斯宾格勒作品的看法。费多·斯特潘认为,尽管斯宾格勒的观点有可疑的独创性,但他对死亡概念的深刻思考使他与众不同,在他看来,这可能会重新点燃宗教生活。尼古拉·别尔贾耶夫认为,这位德国思想家成功地弥补了宗教维度的缺失,这要归功于他对技术的深入(尽管有些模糊)反思,尤其是对俄罗斯世界的具体参考。弗兰克批评了斯宾格勒的悲观主义,因为他相信危机时刻会开启进一步的历史发展。Matvej Kagan将Natorp基于无限变量并面向未来的立场与Spengler以有限结构为中心并回顾过去的观点进行了比较和对比。上述作者与斯本格勒的著作进行的比较是俄罗斯哲学思想进步的主要来源,目的是与欧洲精神实现理想的和谐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
La crisi della cultura europea nelle opere dei filosofi russi del Novecento: a proposito delle idee di Oswald Spengler
The present paper explores the positions of four Russian intellectuals on the work of Oswald Spengler. Fedor Stepun maintains that, despite the dubious originality of his conception, Spengler distinguishes himself for the depth of his reflections on the concept of death, which in his opinion might rekindle religious life. Nikolaj Berdjaev believes that the German thinker succeeds in compensating for the lack of a religious dimension thanks to an in-depth, though somewhat am- biguous, reflection on technique, above all with specific reference to the Russian world. Semen Frank critiques Spengler’s pessimism, out of the belief that moments of crisis unlock further historical development. Matvej Kagan compares and con- trasts Natorp’s position, which is based on infinite variables and is open to the future, with Spengler’s ideas, which are centered on finite structures and look back to the past. The comparison undertaken by the aforementioned authors with Spen- gler’s work has been a major source of progress for Russian philosophical thought, with a view to an ideal harmonization with the European spirit .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信