动物血清的伽马辐射:病原体减少效果的验证和对血清性能影响的评估

M. Plavsic, R. Nims, M. Wintgens, R. Versteegen
{"title":"动物血清的伽马辐射:病原体减少效果的验证和对血清性能影响的评估","authors":"M. Plavsic, R. Nims, M. Wintgens, R. Versteegen","doi":"10.12665/J152.PLAVSIC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"T he treatment of animal serum by gamma irradiation, for the purpose of mitigating the risk of introducing a pathogen (virus, mollicute, or other microbe) into a cell culture, is a process that has been executed (and perhaps understood) primarily by irradiation contractors utilized by serum manufacturers. The selection of appropriate exposure conditions and irradiation doses is driven by a number of critical factors including: (1) the validation and control of the irradiation process itself; (2) the efficacy of the applied irradiation dose range for inactivating pathogens of interest; (3) determination and control of critical process attributes; (4) the potential impacts of these irradiation dose levels on the serum being irradiated; and finally, (5) the potential impact of irradiated serum on the medicinal product and the associated manufacturing process where serum is ultimately used. In order to increase awareness of these topics throughout the cell culture community, we have addressed these critical factors in the current review. Introduction This article is part of a series of papers that are being authored under the sponsorship of the International Serum Industry Association (ISIA) with the purpose of establishing best practices for processes employed in the gamma irradiation of animal serum. In the present article, we describe best practices for validating the efficacy of viral inactivation during gamma irradiation of serum. In general, these practices can be applied for validating pathogen reduction for other microbes. A survey of gamma irradiation efficacy for the inactivation of pathogens, especially viruses and mollicutes (mycoplasmas and acholeplasmas), in frozen serum will be presented. Finally, as will be explained further, a useful window of irradiation dosage must be established, not only in terms of fluency required for pathogen inactivation, but also keeping in mind that the desired performance characteristics of the material being irradiated must remain intact. The latter must be empirically evaluated both by serum manufacturers and end-users of the irradiated serum. Best practices for these evaluations have also been described. As will become apparent, there is a necessary trade-off between optimization of pathogen reduction by gamma irradiation and preservation of performance of the irradiated serum as a medium additive for cell culture applications. 1. Validation of the Efficacy of Gamma Irradiation for Viral Inactivation The main objectives of a validation study involving gamma irradiation of animal serum (or other animalderived liquid materials) are to: (1) establish the kinetics of virus inactivation in such matrices at various increasing irradiation doses; and (2) select a minimum irradiation dose at which adequate virus inactivation is achieved. An irradiation dose is expressed as fluency, in units of kiloGrays (kGy) or in units of megarads (MR), where 1 MR = 10 kGy. The term “fluency” incorporates both dose-rate and time, making this a very useful term for the comparison of efficacy in different exposure scenarios. Efficacy information obtained through validation is necessary for establishing the commercial product irradiation dose range. Serum performance at increasing irradiation doses must be taken into account in order to determine the highest irradiation dose at which physicochemical, biochemical, and biological performance properties of serum product are deemed acceptable. IMAGE: A negatively-stained transmission electron micrograph of rotavirus particles. Rotavirus is a member of the Reoviridae family. (Credit: CDC/Dr. Erskine Palmer, http://phil.cdc.gov/phil/)","PeriodicalId":88836,"journal":{"name":"Bioprocessing","volume":"15 1","pages":"12-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gamma Irradiation of Animal Serum: Validation of Efficacy for Pathogen Reduction and Assessment of Impacts on Serum Performance\",\"authors\":\"M. Plavsic, R. Nims, M. Wintgens, R. Versteegen\",\"doi\":\"10.12665/J152.PLAVSIC\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"T he treatment of animal serum by gamma irradiation, for the purpose of mitigating the risk of introducing a pathogen (virus, mollicute, or other microbe) into a cell culture, is a process that has been executed (and perhaps understood) primarily by irradiation contractors utilized by serum manufacturers. The selection of appropriate exposure conditions and irradiation doses is driven by a number of critical factors including: (1) the validation and control of the irradiation process itself; (2) the efficacy of the applied irradiation dose range for inactivating pathogens of interest; (3) determination and control of critical process attributes; (4) the potential impacts of these irradiation dose levels on the serum being irradiated; and finally, (5) the potential impact of irradiated serum on the medicinal product and the associated manufacturing process where serum is ultimately used. In order to increase awareness of these topics throughout the cell culture community, we have addressed these critical factors in the current review. Introduction This article is part of a series of papers that are being authored under the sponsorship of the International Serum Industry Association (ISIA) with the purpose of establishing best practices for processes employed in the gamma irradiation of animal serum. In the present article, we describe best practices for validating the efficacy of viral inactivation during gamma irradiation of serum. In general, these practices can be applied for validating pathogen reduction for other microbes. A survey of gamma irradiation efficacy for the inactivation of pathogens, especially viruses and mollicutes (mycoplasmas and acholeplasmas), in frozen serum will be presented. Finally, as will be explained further, a useful window of irradiation dosage must be established, not only in terms of fluency required for pathogen inactivation, but also keeping in mind that the desired performance characteristics of the material being irradiated must remain intact. The latter must be empirically evaluated both by serum manufacturers and end-users of the irradiated serum. Best practices for these evaluations have also been described. As will become apparent, there is a necessary trade-off between optimization of pathogen reduction by gamma irradiation and preservation of performance of the irradiated serum as a medium additive for cell culture applications. 1. Validation of the Efficacy of Gamma Irradiation for Viral Inactivation The main objectives of a validation study involving gamma irradiation of animal serum (or other animalderived liquid materials) are to: (1) establish the kinetics of virus inactivation in such matrices at various increasing irradiation doses; and (2) select a minimum irradiation dose at which adequate virus inactivation is achieved. An irradiation dose is expressed as fluency, in units of kiloGrays (kGy) or in units of megarads (MR), where 1 MR = 10 kGy. The term “fluency” incorporates both dose-rate and time, making this a very useful term for the comparison of efficacy in different exposure scenarios. Efficacy information obtained through validation is necessary for establishing the commercial product irradiation dose range. Serum performance at increasing irradiation doses must be taken into account in order to determine the highest irradiation dose at which physicochemical, biochemical, and biological performance properties of serum product are deemed acceptable. IMAGE: A negatively-stained transmission electron micrograph of rotavirus particles. Rotavirus is a member of the Reoviridae family. (Credit: CDC/Dr. Erskine Palmer, http://phil.cdc.gov/phil/)\",\"PeriodicalId\":88836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioprocessing\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"12-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioprocessing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12665/J152.PLAVSIC\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioprocessing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12665/J152.PLAVSIC","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

为了降低将病原体(病毒、分子或其他微生物)引入细胞培养物的风险,用伽马射线辐照处理动物血清是一种主要由血清制造商使用的辐照承包商执行(或许也被理解)的过程。适当的照射条件和照射剂量的选择取决于若干关键因素,包括:(1)照射过程本身的验证和控制;(2)辐照剂量范围对目标病原体的灭活效果;(3)关键工艺属性的确定与控制;(四)辐照剂量水平对被照射血清的潜在影响;最后,(5)辐照血清对药品和最终使用血清的相关生产过程的潜在影响。为了提高整个细胞培养界对这些主题的认识,我们在当前的综述中讨论了这些关键因素。本文是在国际血清工业协会(ISIA)的赞助下撰写的一系列论文的一部分,目的是建立动物血清伽马辐照过程的最佳实践。在这篇文章中,我们描述了在血清伽马辐射期间验证病毒灭活功效的最佳实践。一般来说,这些做法可用于验证其他微生物的病原体减少。本文将介绍伽玛辐照对冷冻血清中致病菌,特别是病毒和分子(支原体和胆原体)灭活效果的调查。最后,正如将进一步解释的那样,必须建立一个有用的辐照剂量窗口,不仅要考虑到病原体灭活所需的流畅性,而且要记住,被辐照材料的期望性能特征必须保持不变。后者必须由血清制造商和辐照血清的最终用户进行经验性评估。还描述了这些评估的最佳实践。显而易见的是,在通过伽马辐照优化病原体减少和保存辐照血清作为细胞培养应用的培养基添加剂的性能之间存在必要的权衡。1. 涉及动物血清(或其他动物源性液体材料)γ辐射的验证研究的主要目标是:(1)在不同辐照剂量下建立病毒在这些基质中的灭活动力学;(2)选择达到充分灭活病毒的最小辐照剂量。辐照剂量以流利度表示,单位为千格瑞(kGy)或毫格瑞(MR),其中1mr = 10kgy。“流畅性”一词包含了剂量率和时间,使其成为比较不同暴露情况下疗效的一个非常有用的术语。通过验证获得的功效信息对于确定商业产品辐照剂量范围是必要的。必须考虑血清在增加辐照剂量下的性能,以便确定血清产品的理化、生化和生物学性能可接受的最高辐照剂量。图片:轮状病毒颗粒的阴性染色透射电子显微照片。轮状病毒是呼肠孤病毒科的一员。(来源:疾病预防控制中心/博士。Erskine Palmer, http://phil.cdc.gov/phil/)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gamma Irradiation of Animal Serum: Validation of Efficacy for Pathogen Reduction and Assessment of Impacts on Serum Performance
T he treatment of animal serum by gamma irradiation, for the purpose of mitigating the risk of introducing a pathogen (virus, mollicute, or other microbe) into a cell culture, is a process that has been executed (and perhaps understood) primarily by irradiation contractors utilized by serum manufacturers. The selection of appropriate exposure conditions and irradiation doses is driven by a number of critical factors including: (1) the validation and control of the irradiation process itself; (2) the efficacy of the applied irradiation dose range for inactivating pathogens of interest; (3) determination and control of critical process attributes; (4) the potential impacts of these irradiation dose levels on the serum being irradiated; and finally, (5) the potential impact of irradiated serum on the medicinal product and the associated manufacturing process where serum is ultimately used. In order to increase awareness of these topics throughout the cell culture community, we have addressed these critical factors in the current review. Introduction This article is part of a series of papers that are being authored under the sponsorship of the International Serum Industry Association (ISIA) with the purpose of establishing best practices for processes employed in the gamma irradiation of animal serum. In the present article, we describe best practices for validating the efficacy of viral inactivation during gamma irradiation of serum. In general, these practices can be applied for validating pathogen reduction for other microbes. A survey of gamma irradiation efficacy for the inactivation of pathogens, especially viruses and mollicutes (mycoplasmas and acholeplasmas), in frozen serum will be presented. Finally, as will be explained further, a useful window of irradiation dosage must be established, not only in terms of fluency required for pathogen inactivation, but also keeping in mind that the desired performance characteristics of the material being irradiated must remain intact. The latter must be empirically evaluated both by serum manufacturers and end-users of the irradiated serum. Best practices for these evaluations have also been described. As will become apparent, there is a necessary trade-off between optimization of pathogen reduction by gamma irradiation and preservation of performance of the irradiated serum as a medium additive for cell culture applications. 1. Validation of the Efficacy of Gamma Irradiation for Viral Inactivation The main objectives of a validation study involving gamma irradiation of animal serum (or other animalderived liquid materials) are to: (1) establish the kinetics of virus inactivation in such matrices at various increasing irradiation doses; and (2) select a minimum irradiation dose at which adequate virus inactivation is achieved. An irradiation dose is expressed as fluency, in units of kiloGrays (kGy) or in units of megarads (MR), where 1 MR = 10 kGy. The term “fluency” incorporates both dose-rate and time, making this a very useful term for the comparison of efficacy in different exposure scenarios. Efficacy information obtained through validation is necessary for establishing the commercial product irradiation dose range. Serum performance at increasing irradiation doses must be taken into account in order to determine the highest irradiation dose at which physicochemical, biochemical, and biological performance properties of serum product are deemed acceptable. IMAGE: A negatively-stained transmission electron micrograph of rotavirus particles. Rotavirus is a member of the Reoviridae family. (Credit: CDC/Dr. Erskine Palmer, http://phil.cdc.gov/phil/)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信