质性社会学方法解决社会工作的多样性问题

S. Azmi
{"title":"质性社会学方法解决社会工作的多样性问题","authors":"S. Azmi","doi":"10.1300/J285V07N03_08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article identifies prevailing conceptual approaches employed to formulate issues of diversity for social work research and practice. It argues that the notions of “welfare” and “diversity” are customarily defined within unduly narrow realms. “Welfare” is normally defined from the ideological perspective of modern mainstream society, even though competing minority ideologies of “welfare” are both possible and evident. “Diversity” is normally organized around the central concept of “ethnicity,” even though the universality of this notion is questionable. In response a research approach to address these limitations is proposed which employs a sociological perspective and qualitative methodology to discern appropriate conceptual frameworks.","PeriodicalId":85006,"journal":{"name":"Journal of multicultural social work","volume":"7 1","pages":"147-164"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J285V07N03_08","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Qualitative Sociological Approach to Address Issues of Diversity for Social Work\",\"authors\":\"S. Azmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1300/J285V07N03_08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article identifies prevailing conceptual approaches employed to formulate issues of diversity for social work research and practice. It argues that the notions of “welfare” and “diversity” are customarily defined within unduly narrow realms. “Welfare” is normally defined from the ideological perspective of modern mainstream society, even though competing minority ideologies of “welfare” are both possible and evident. “Diversity” is normally organized around the central concept of “ethnicity,” even though the universality of this notion is questionable. In response a research approach to address these limitations is proposed which employs a sociological perspective and qualitative methodology to discern appropriate conceptual frameworks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":85006,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of multicultural social work\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"147-164\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/J285V07N03_08\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of multicultural social work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1300/J285V07N03_08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of multicultural social work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J285V07N03_08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文确定了用于制定社会工作研究和实践的多样性问题的流行概念方法。它认为,“福利”和“多样性”的概念通常是在过于狭隘的领域内定义的。“福利”通常是从现代主流社会的意识形态角度来定义的,尽管少数人对“福利”的竞争意识形态既可能又明显。“多样性”通常是围绕“种族”这个中心概念组织起来的,尽管这个概念的普遍性值得怀疑。作为回应,提出了一种研究方法来解决这些限制,该方法采用社会学观点和定性方法来辨别适当的概念框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Qualitative Sociological Approach to Address Issues of Diversity for Social Work
ABSTRACT This article identifies prevailing conceptual approaches employed to formulate issues of diversity for social work research and practice. It argues that the notions of “welfare” and “diversity” are customarily defined within unduly narrow realms. “Welfare” is normally defined from the ideological perspective of modern mainstream society, even though competing minority ideologies of “welfare” are both possible and evident. “Diversity” is normally organized around the central concept of “ethnicity,” even though the universality of this notion is questionable. In response a research approach to address these limitations is proposed which employs a sociological perspective and qualitative methodology to discern appropriate conceptual frameworks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信