L. Dwipa, M. Apandi, Priyo Panji Utomo, Mira Hasmirani, A. Rakhimullah, F. A. Yulianto, Y. Pratiwi
{"title":"印度尼西亚版体弱量表和SARC-F在老年人中的适应和验证","authors":"L. Dwipa, M. Apandi, Priyo Panji Utomo, Mira Hasmirani, A. Rakhimullah, F. A. Yulianto, Y. Pratiwi","doi":"10.12809/ajgg-2020-436-oa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To adapt and validate the Indonesian version of the FRAIL scale (Ina-FRAIL) and the SARC-F (Ina-SARC-F). Methods. The Ina-FRAIL and the Ina-SARC-F were developed through forwards-backwards translation, and their validity (itemtotal item correlations), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), and test-retest reliability (kappa statistic) were determined. The diagnostic performance of the Ina-FRAIL and the Ina-SARC-F was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results. A total of 101 (57 men and 44 women) and 64 (23 men and 41 women) patients were included in the validation of the Ina-FRAIL scale and the Ina-SARC-F, respectively. For the Ina-FRAIL scale, internal consistency coefficient was 0.530, and test-retest reliability was 0.951 (p<0.001). The correlation coefficients between the total score and items of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight were 0.503, 0.813, 0.679, 0.561, and 0.317, respectively (all p<0.001). Correlation between the Ina-FRAIL scale and the Cardiovascular Health Study was strong (rs=0.696, p<0.001). Using the cut-off value of ≥2, the diagnostic performance of the Ina-FRAIL was 80% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity. For the Ina-SARC-F, internal consistency was 0.851, and test-retest reliability was 1.00 (p<0.001). The correlation coefficients between the total score and items of strength, ambulation, rising, climbing, and falls were 0.646, 0.775, 0.653, 0.685, and 0.580, respectively (all r>0.361 and p<0.001). Using the cut-off value of ≥3, the diagnosis performance of the Ina-SARC-F was 100% sensitivity and 61.7% specificity. Conclusions. The Ina-FRAIL scale and the Ina-SARC-F are valid and reliable tools to screen for frailty syndrome and sarcopenia, respectively.","PeriodicalId":38338,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the FRAIL scale and the SARC-F in older adults\",\"authors\":\"L. Dwipa, M. Apandi, Priyo Panji Utomo, Mira Hasmirani, A. Rakhimullah, F. A. Yulianto, Y. Pratiwi\",\"doi\":\"10.12809/ajgg-2020-436-oa\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective. To adapt and validate the Indonesian version of the FRAIL scale (Ina-FRAIL) and the SARC-F (Ina-SARC-F). Methods. The Ina-FRAIL and the Ina-SARC-F were developed through forwards-backwards translation, and their validity (itemtotal item correlations), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), and test-retest reliability (kappa statistic) were determined. The diagnostic performance of the Ina-FRAIL and the Ina-SARC-F was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results. A total of 101 (57 men and 44 women) and 64 (23 men and 41 women) patients were included in the validation of the Ina-FRAIL scale and the Ina-SARC-F, respectively. For the Ina-FRAIL scale, internal consistency coefficient was 0.530, and test-retest reliability was 0.951 (p<0.001). The correlation coefficients between the total score and items of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight were 0.503, 0.813, 0.679, 0.561, and 0.317, respectively (all p<0.001). Correlation between the Ina-FRAIL scale and the Cardiovascular Health Study was strong (rs=0.696, p<0.001). Using the cut-off value of ≥2, the diagnostic performance of the Ina-FRAIL was 80% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity. For the Ina-SARC-F, internal consistency was 0.851, and test-retest reliability was 1.00 (p<0.001). The correlation coefficients between the total score and items of strength, ambulation, rising, climbing, and falls were 0.646, 0.775, 0.653, 0.685, and 0.580, respectively (all r>0.361 and p<0.001). Using the cut-off value of ≥3, the diagnosis performance of the Ina-SARC-F was 100% sensitivity and 61.7% specificity. Conclusions. The Ina-FRAIL scale and the Ina-SARC-F are valid and reliable tools to screen for frailty syndrome and sarcopenia, respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12809/ajgg-2020-436-oa\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Gerontology and Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/ajgg-2020-436-oa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Adaptation and validation of the Indonesian version of the FRAIL scale and the SARC-F in older adults
Objective. To adapt and validate the Indonesian version of the FRAIL scale (Ina-FRAIL) and the SARC-F (Ina-SARC-F). Methods. The Ina-FRAIL and the Ina-SARC-F were developed through forwards-backwards translation, and their validity (itemtotal item correlations), internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha), and test-retest reliability (kappa statistic) were determined. The diagnostic performance of the Ina-FRAIL and the Ina-SARC-F was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Results. A total of 101 (57 men and 44 women) and 64 (23 men and 41 women) patients were included in the validation of the Ina-FRAIL scale and the Ina-SARC-F, respectively. For the Ina-FRAIL scale, internal consistency coefficient was 0.530, and test-retest reliability was 0.951 (p<0.001). The correlation coefficients between the total score and items of fatigue, resistance, ambulation, illness, and loss of weight were 0.503, 0.813, 0.679, 0.561, and 0.317, respectively (all p<0.001). Correlation between the Ina-FRAIL scale and the Cardiovascular Health Study was strong (rs=0.696, p<0.001). Using the cut-off value of ≥2, the diagnostic performance of the Ina-FRAIL was 80% sensitivity and 70.4% specificity. For the Ina-SARC-F, internal consistency was 0.851, and test-retest reliability was 1.00 (p<0.001). The correlation coefficients between the total score and items of strength, ambulation, rising, climbing, and falls were 0.646, 0.775, 0.653, 0.685, and 0.580, respectively (all r>0.361 and p<0.001). Using the cut-off value of ≥3, the diagnosis performance of the Ina-SARC-F was 100% sensitivity and 61.7% specificity. Conclusions. The Ina-FRAIL scale and the Ina-SARC-F are valid and reliable tools to screen for frailty syndrome and sarcopenia, respectively.