翻译的不确定性

Q3 Arts and Humanities

Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem Pub Date : 2019-08-26 DOI:10.12797/moap.25.2019.45.04

Spiros Macris

{"title":"翻译的不确定性","authors":"Spiros Macris","doi":"10.12797/moap.25.2019.45.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"About Some Poems of Hans Faverey (1933-1990) \nRepresentation, as an actualisation of a text, is the real object of translation. In order to better understand the implications of this theoretical position, it is explored through the study of translations into French and English of a few poems by the Dutch writer Hans Faverey (1933-1990) as his work constitutes a radical critique of representation. The means of his critique are: autonomy of the poem considered as a device, referential deviation, syntactic alteration, etc. These elements transform the translation process in the sense of a greater indeterminacy, but also change the nature of the translational process. These multidimensional modifications find an adequate theoretical framework in Roman Ingarden’s analysis of translation as an intentional object.","PeriodicalId":36042,"journal":{"name":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Traduire l’incertitude\",\"authors\":\"Spiros Macris\",\"doi\":\"10.12797/moap.25.2019.45.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"About Some Poems of Hans Faverey (1933-1990) \\nRepresentation, as an actualisation of a text, is the real object of translation. In order to better understand the implications of this theoretical position, it is explored through the study of translations into French and English of a few poems by the Dutch writer Hans Faverey (1933-1990) as his work constitutes a radical critique of representation. The means of his critique are: autonomy of the poem considered as a device, referential deviation, syntactic alteration, etc. These elements transform the translation process in the sense of a greater indeterminacy, but also change the nature of the translational process. These multidimensional modifications find an adequate theoretical framework in Roman Ingarden’s analysis of translation as an intentional object.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.25.2019.45.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12797/moap.25.2019.45.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

再现作为文本的一种实现，是翻译的真正目的。为了更好地理解这一理论立场的含义，我们通过研究荷兰作家汉斯·法韦里(Hans Faverey, 1933-1990)的几首诗的英译来探讨这一问题，因为他的作品构成了对再现的激进批判。他的批评手段主要有:作为一种手段的诗的自主性、指称偏离、句法改变等。这些因素使翻译过程在某种意义上具有了更大的不确定性，同时也改变了翻译过程的性质。这些多维度的修正在英加登对翻译作为意向性客体的分析中找到了合适的理论框架。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Traduire l’incertitude

About Some Poems of Hans Faverey (1933-1990) Representation, as an actualisation of a text, is the real object of translation. In order to better understand the implications of this theoretical position, it is explored through the study of translations into French and English of a few poems by the Dutch writer Hans Faverey (1933-1990) as his work constitutes a radical critique of representation. The means of his critique are: autonomy of the poem considered as a device, referential deviation, syntactic alteration, etc. These elements transform the translation process in the sense of a greater indeterminacy, but also change the nature of the translational process. These multidimensional modifications find an adequate theoretical framework in Roman Ingarden’s analysis of translation as an intentional object.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Miedzy Oryginalem a Przekladem Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量