{"title":"边界捕获,吸入虹吸和排水流动:管道入口重新访问数值","authors":"Peter A. Jumars","doi":"10.1215/21573689-2082871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p>Flows produced in suspension feeding and tube and burrow ventilation cause and influence many exchange processes and chemical reactions. I investigated two geometries, a capillary drawing water far from any other boundary and a constant-diameter drain flush with the bottom. Flow descriptions just inside these inlets have relied on solutions to pipe entry that posit uniform entrance velocity. I substituted the more realistic boundary condition of constant volumetric outflow rate in finite-element models for 0.01 ≤ <i>Re</i> ≤ 2000. <i>Re</i> is the pipe Reynolds number, the product of mean capillary flow speed and capillary inside diameter (<i>D</i>) divided by kinematic viscosity of the fluid. For the smallest <i>Re</i> in both geometries, axial velocity reached 99% of its maximal value at a distance 0.2725<i>D</i> into the entry—not the 0.619 <i>D</i> found with uniform entrance velocity—and flow entering the capillary originated from a small, cylindrical region centered on the pipe axis. Axial flow velocities approaching the inlets therefore decreased away from the opening more slowly than predicted by simple convergence. For <i>Re</i> >330, flow converging on the capillary found traction on its outer wall (an apparent Coandă effect), and flow separation had major effects inside. Flow entering the siphon at these high <i>Re</i> values originated below the capillary entrance, and subsequent decrease in <i>Re</i> failed to dislodge the flow from its boundary-trapped state. Such hysteresis and flow bifurcation is unusual at low Reynolds numbers and could affect suspension feeders that deploy siphons and water samplers that use suction.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":100878,"journal":{"name":"Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments","volume":"3 1","pages":"21-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1215/21573689-2082871","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boundary-trapped, inhalant siphon and drain flows: Pipe entry revisited numerically\",\"authors\":\"Peter A. Jumars\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/21573689-2082871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p>Flows produced in suspension feeding and tube and burrow ventilation cause and influence many exchange processes and chemical reactions. I investigated two geometries, a capillary drawing water far from any other boundary and a constant-diameter drain flush with the bottom. Flow descriptions just inside these inlets have relied on solutions to pipe entry that posit uniform entrance velocity. I substituted the more realistic boundary condition of constant volumetric outflow rate in finite-element models for 0.01 ≤ <i>Re</i> ≤ 2000. <i>Re</i> is the pipe Reynolds number, the product of mean capillary flow speed and capillary inside diameter (<i>D</i>) divided by kinematic viscosity of the fluid. For the smallest <i>Re</i> in both geometries, axial velocity reached 99% of its maximal value at a distance 0.2725<i>D</i> into the entry—not the 0.619 <i>D</i> found with uniform entrance velocity—and flow entering the capillary originated from a small, cylindrical region centered on the pipe axis. Axial flow velocities approaching the inlets therefore decreased away from the opening more slowly than predicted by simple convergence. For <i>Re</i> >330, flow converging on the capillary found traction on its outer wall (an apparent Coandă effect), and flow separation had major effects inside. Flow entering the siphon at these high <i>Re</i> values originated below the capillary entrance, and subsequent decrease in <i>Re</i> failed to dislodge the flow from its boundary-trapped state. Such hysteresis and flow bifurcation is unusual at low Reynolds numbers and could affect suspension feeders that deploy siphons and water samplers that use suction.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100878,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"21-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1215/21573689-2082871\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1215/21573689-2082871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Limnology and Oceanography: Fluids and Environments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1215/21573689-2082871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Boundary-trapped, inhalant siphon and drain flows: Pipe entry revisited numerically
Flows produced in suspension feeding and tube and burrow ventilation cause and influence many exchange processes and chemical reactions. I investigated two geometries, a capillary drawing water far from any other boundary and a constant-diameter drain flush with the bottom. Flow descriptions just inside these inlets have relied on solutions to pipe entry that posit uniform entrance velocity. I substituted the more realistic boundary condition of constant volumetric outflow rate in finite-element models for 0.01 ≤ Re ≤ 2000. Re is the pipe Reynolds number, the product of mean capillary flow speed and capillary inside diameter (D) divided by kinematic viscosity of the fluid. For the smallest Re in both geometries, axial velocity reached 99% of its maximal value at a distance 0.2725D into the entry—not the 0.619 D found with uniform entrance velocity—and flow entering the capillary originated from a small, cylindrical region centered on the pipe axis. Axial flow velocities approaching the inlets therefore decreased away from the opening more slowly than predicted by simple convergence. For Re >330, flow converging on the capillary found traction on its outer wall (an apparent Coandă effect), and flow separation had major effects inside. Flow entering the siphon at these high Re values originated below the capillary entrance, and subsequent decrease in Re failed to dislodge the flow from its boundary-trapped state. Such hysteresis and flow bifurcation is unusual at low Reynolds numbers and could affect suspension feeders that deploy siphons and water samplers that use suction.