扩散火焰中LES燃烧模型的比较研究

Q4 Energy
Xiao Liu, C. Gong, Zhiming Li, Hongtao Zheng
{"title":"扩散火焰中LES燃烧模型的比较研究","authors":"Xiao Liu, C. Gong, Zhiming Li, Hongtao Zheng","doi":"10.11990/JHEU.201705045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study comparatively analyzes the calculation performances of different large-eddy simulation (LES) combustion models in a diffused flame simulation to investigate the performances of different LES-turbulent combustion models. The flamelet/progress variable (FPV), partially stirred reactor (PaSR), and transport joint possibility density function (PDF) combustion model are adopted to perform a numerical simulation analysis for Flame D in the Sandia Lab. The comparison between the calculation results and the test data shows that the three models can properly simulate the diffused flame. The transport PDF model based on the Eulerian stochastic field method can realize better results, especially the forecast for the intermediate radicals (OH) and the pollutant emissions (NO). However, the calculation volume is huge. The calculation speed and precision of PaSR are acceptable. The FPV method can save much CPU time, and has great value in engineering applications. (Less)","PeriodicalId":35592,"journal":{"name":"哈尔滨工程大学学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison study on LES combustion models in diffusion flame\",\"authors\":\"Xiao Liu, C. Gong, Zhiming Li, Hongtao Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.11990/JHEU.201705045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study comparatively analyzes the calculation performances of different large-eddy simulation (LES) combustion models in a diffused flame simulation to investigate the performances of different LES-turbulent combustion models. The flamelet/progress variable (FPV), partially stirred reactor (PaSR), and transport joint possibility density function (PDF) combustion model are adopted to perform a numerical simulation analysis for Flame D in the Sandia Lab. The comparison between the calculation results and the test data shows that the three models can properly simulate the diffused flame. The transport PDF model based on the Eulerian stochastic field method can realize better results, especially the forecast for the intermediate radicals (OH) and the pollutant emissions (NO). However, the calculation volume is huge. The calculation speed and precision of PaSR are acceptable. The FPV method can save much CPU time, and has great value in engineering applications. (Less)\",\"PeriodicalId\":35592,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"哈尔滨工程大学学报\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"哈尔滨工程大学学报\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11990/JHEU.201705045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Energy\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"哈尔滨工程大学学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11990/JHEU.201705045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究对比分析了扩散火焰模拟中不同大涡模拟(LES)燃烧模型的计算性能,探讨了不同大涡-湍流燃烧模型的性能。采用火焰/进程变量(FPV)、部分搅拌反应器(PaSR)和输运联合可能密度函数(PDF)燃烧模型对Sandia实验室的火焰D进行了数值模拟分析。计算结果与试验数据的对比表明,三种模型均能较好地模拟扩散火焰。基于欧拉随机场方法的输运PDF模型对中间自由基(OH)和污染物排放(NO)的预测效果较好。然而,计算量是巨大的。PaSR的计算速度和精度是可以接受的。FPV方法可以节省大量的CPU时间,具有重要的工程应用价值。(少)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison study on LES combustion models in diffusion flame
This study comparatively analyzes the calculation performances of different large-eddy simulation (LES) combustion models in a diffused flame simulation to investigate the performances of different LES-turbulent combustion models. The flamelet/progress variable (FPV), partially stirred reactor (PaSR), and transport joint possibility density function (PDF) combustion model are adopted to perform a numerical simulation analysis for Flame D in the Sandia Lab. The comparison between the calculation results and the test data shows that the three models can properly simulate the diffused flame. The transport PDF model based on the Eulerian stochastic field method can realize better results, especially the forecast for the intermediate radicals (OH) and the pollutant emissions (NO). However, the calculation volume is huge. The calculation speed and precision of PaSR are acceptable. The FPV method can save much CPU time, and has great value in engineering applications. (Less)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
哈尔滨工程大学学报
哈尔滨工程大学学报 Energy-Nuclear Energy and Engineering
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6802
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信