{"title":"反宗教改革的终身写作","authors":"Danielle Clarke","doi":"10.1215/10829636-7986601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On December 19, 2017 in Paris, the art world was stunned by a recordbreaking sale of a selfportrait by a seventeenthcentury woman artist — Artemesia Gentileschi’s SelfPortrait as St. Catherine — which fetched EUR 2.36 million at auction.1 This was not the first time that Gentileschi had painted herself as St. Catherine; there is a painting on the same theme with a very similar composition in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence. In the portrait the figure is immediately identified as St. Catherine by the martyr’s palm and the distinctive spiked wheel; the identity of the model had long remained obscure, but is clearly established by comparison with other known selfportraits as Gentileschi herself.2 While the immediate reason for using her own image for this portrait of St. Catherine may be pragmatic — early modern social and cultural expectations precluded the use of live models by a female artist — the implications of this complex selfidentification are intriguing for thinking about various forms of life writing and selfnarratives as they emerge and develop over the course of the seventeenth century. Even if Gentileschi is her own most proximate model, the process of painting herself requires an intense level of fixation on the physical self, in this instance compounded by the necessity of using a mirror. While the mirror as an object bears tropological meaning as inappropriate selfregard and vanity for women in particular, it may also be pressed into service for purposes of selfexamination and discipline, as Tobie Matthew asserts concerning Teresa de Ávila:","PeriodicalId":51901,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES","volume":"50 1","pages":"75-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Life Writing for the Counter-Reformation\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Clarke\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/10829636-7986601\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"On December 19, 2017 in Paris, the art world was stunned by a recordbreaking sale of a selfportrait by a seventeenthcentury woman artist — Artemesia Gentileschi’s SelfPortrait as St. Catherine — which fetched EUR 2.36 million at auction.1 This was not the first time that Gentileschi had painted herself as St. Catherine; there is a painting on the same theme with a very similar composition in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence. In the portrait the figure is immediately identified as St. Catherine by the martyr’s palm and the distinctive spiked wheel; the identity of the model had long remained obscure, but is clearly established by comparison with other known selfportraits as Gentileschi herself.2 While the immediate reason for using her own image for this portrait of St. Catherine may be pragmatic — early modern social and cultural expectations precluded the use of live models by a female artist — the implications of this complex selfidentification are intriguing for thinking about various forms of life writing and selfnarratives as they emerge and develop over the course of the seventeenth century. Even if Gentileschi is her own most proximate model, the process of painting herself requires an intense level of fixation on the physical self, in this instance compounded by the necessity of using a mirror. While the mirror as an object bears tropological meaning as inappropriate selfregard and vanity for women in particular, it may also be pressed into service for purposes of selfexamination and discipline, as Tobie Matthew asserts concerning Teresa de Ávila:\",\"PeriodicalId\":51901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"75-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-7986601\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MEDIEVAL AND EARLY MODERN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/10829636-7986601","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
2017年12月19日,17世纪女性艺术家Artemesia Gentileschi的自画像《圣凯瑟琳》(self - portrait as St. Catherine)在巴黎拍出了236万欧元的天价,震惊了整个艺术界这并不是真蒂列斯基第一次把自己画成圣凯瑟琳;在佛罗伦萨的乌菲齐美术馆有一幅同样主题的画,构图非常相似。在这幅肖像中,通过殉道者的手掌和独特的尖轮,这个人物立即被认出是圣凯瑟琳;模特的身份长期以来一直不为人知,但通过与其他已知的自画像(如Gentileschi本人)进行比较,可以清楚地确定下来虽然用她自己的形象来画这幅圣凯瑟琳的画像的直接原因可能是实用主义的——早期现代社会和文化的期望排除了女性艺术家使用真人模特的可能性——但这种复杂的自我认同的含义是有趣的,可以思考各种形式的生活写作和自我叙述,因为它们在17世纪的过程中出现和发展。即使真蒂列斯基是她自己最接近的模特,画自己的过程也需要对身体自我的强烈关注,在这种情况下,使用镜子的必要性加剧了这种关注。虽然镜子作为一种物体具有隐喻意义,尤其是对女性来说,它是不恰当的自我关注和虚荣,但它也可能被用于自我检查和纪律的目的,正如托比·马修(Tobie Matthew)在谈到特蕾莎·德·Ávila时所说的那样:
On December 19, 2017 in Paris, the art world was stunned by a recordbreaking sale of a selfportrait by a seventeenthcentury woman artist — Artemesia Gentileschi’s SelfPortrait as St. Catherine — which fetched EUR 2.36 million at auction.1 This was not the first time that Gentileschi had painted herself as St. Catherine; there is a painting on the same theme with a very similar composition in the Uffizi Gallery in Florence. In the portrait the figure is immediately identified as St. Catherine by the martyr’s palm and the distinctive spiked wheel; the identity of the model had long remained obscure, but is clearly established by comparison with other known selfportraits as Gentileschi herself.2 While the immediate reason for using her own image for this portrait of St. Catherine may be pragmatic — early modern social and cultural expectations precluded the use of live models by a female artist — the implications of this complex selfidentification are intriguing for thinking about various forms of life writing and selfnarratives as they emerge and develop over the course of the seventeenth century. Even if Gentileschi is her own most proximate model, the process of painting herself requires an intense level of fixation on the physical self, in this instance compounded by the necessity of using a mirror. While the mirror as an object bears tropological meaning as inappropriate selfregard and vanity for women in particular, it may also be pressed into service for purposes of selfexamination and discipline, as Tobie Matthew asserts concerning Teresa de Ávila:
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Medieval and Early Modern Studies publishes articles informed by historical inquiry and alert to issues raised by contemporary theoretical debate. The journal fosters rigorous investigation of historiographical representations of European and western Asian cultural forms from late antiquity to the seventeenth century. Its topics include art, literature, theater, music, philosophy, theology, and history, and it embraces material objects as well as texts; women as well as men; merchants, workers, and audiences as well as patrons; Jews and Muslims as well as Christians.