{"title":"关于恩典的著作,或奥古斯丁的正确生活方式","authors":"M. Pécharman","doi":"10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article forms part of the introduction to the volume. It first emphasizes the strata in Pascal’s exegesis of the Decree on justification of the Council of Trent. For Pascal, a logico-grammatical analysis of the proposition ‘God’s commandments are not impossible’ is enough to refute its Molinist interpretation as a permanent power. But, strategically, the Écrits sur la grâce make Molinism a theological error symmetrical to the negation of actual grace by Lutheranism. The same error recurs structurally in theology: Molinists vs Lutherans are to be considered as the new Pelagians vs new Manicheans. The second part of the article focuses on the question that Pascal claims to have considered fully in the Écrits: God’s ‘double délaissement’ of man. The article shows that the target, when asserting the dependence of continued justification on continued prayer (while this latter is not in man’s power) is to differentiate true Augustinism from pseudo-Augustinism.","PeriodicalId":88312,"journal":{"name":"Seventeenth-century French studies","volume":"35 1","pages":"106 - 115"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000027","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Les Écrits sur la grâce, ou de la bonne manière d’être augustinien\",\"authors\":\"M. Pécharman\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article forms part of the introduction to the volume. It first emphasizes the strata in Pascal’s exegesis of the Decree on justification of the Council of Trent. For Pascal, a logico-grammatical analysis of the proposition ‘God’s commandments are not impossible’ is enough to refute its Molinist interpretation as a permanent power. But, strategically, the Écrits sur la grâce make Molinism a theological error symmetrical to the negation of actual grace by Lutheranism. The same error recurs structurally in theology: Molinists vs Lutherans are to be considered as the new Pelagians vs new Manicheans. The second part of the article focuses on the question that Pascal claims to have considered fully in the Écrits: God’s ‘double délaissement’ of man. The article shows that the target, when asserting the dependence of continued justification on continued prayer (while this latter is not in man’s power) is to differentiate true Augustinism from pseudo-Augustinism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seventeenth-century French studies\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"106 - 115\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000027\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seventeenth-century French studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventeenth-century French studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/0265106813Z.00000000027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文是本卷导论的一部分。它首先强调阶层在帕斯卡的训诂法令的理由理事会的遄达。对于帕斯卡来说,对“上帝的诫命并非不可能”这一命题进行逻辑语法分析,就足以驳倒其作为永恒力量的莫林主义解释。但是,从策略上讲,Écrits sur la grance使Molinism成为一个神学错误,与路德教对实际恩典的否定是对称的。同样的错误在神学结构上反复出现:莫林主义者和路德主义者被认为是新伯拉基派和新摩尼教派。文章的第二部分着重于帕斯卡尔声称在Écrits中已经充分考虑过的问题:上帝对人的“双重惩罚”。文章表明,当主张持续的称义依赖于持续的祈祷(而后者不是在人的权力)时,目标是区分真正的奥古斯丁主义和伪奥古斯丁主义。
Les Écrits sur la grâce, ou de la bonne manière d’être augustinien
Abstract This article forms part of the introduction to the volume. It first emphasizes the strata in Pascal’s exegesis of the Decree on justification of the Council of Trent. For Pascal, a logico-grammatical analysis of the proposition ‘God’s commandments are not impossible’ is enough to refute its Molinist interpretation as a permanent power. But, strategically, the Écrits sur la grâce make Molinism a theological error symmetrical to the negation of actual grace by Lutheranism. The same error recurs structurally in theology: Molinists vs Lutherans are to be considered as the new Pelagians vs new Manicheans. The second part of the article focuses on the question that Pascal claims to have considered fully in the Écrits: God’s ‘double délaissement’ of man. The article shows that the target, when asserting the dependence of continued justification on continued prayer (while this latter is not in man’s power) is to differentiate true Augustinism from pseudo-Augustinism.