实现法医风险评估的透明度:多模式方法

Amy Horstead, A. Cree
{"title":"实现法医风险评估的透明度:多模式方法","authors":"Amy Horstead, A. Cree","doi":"10.1192/APT.BP.112.010645","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SUMMARY The Department of Health’s best practice guidelines on risk management and violence prevention in UK mental health services highlight the importance of transparency and collaboration with service users. The recovery philosophy echoes the importance of service user inclusion and empowerment in treatment. Our experience in a medium and low secure hospital was that patients were largely excluded from the risk assessment process. In this article, we describe a model for achieving inclusion and transparency in the use of risk assessment tools based on structured professional judgement.","PeriodicalId":89879,"journal":{"name":"Advances in psychiatric treatment : the Royal College of Psychiatrists' journal of continuing professional development","volume":"19 1","pages":"351-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/APT.BP.112.010645","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving transparency in forensic risk assessment: a multimodal approach\",\"authors\":\"Amy Horstead, A. Cree\",\"doi\":\"10.1192/APT.BP.112.010645\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SUMMARY The Department of Health’s best practice guidelines on risk management and violence prevention in UK mental health services highlight the importance of transparency and collaboration with service users. The recovery philosophy echoes the importance of service user inclusion and empowerment in treatment. Our experience in a medium and low secure hospital was that patients were largely excluded from the risk assessment process. In this article, we describe a model for achieving inclusion and transparency in the use of risk assessment tools based on structured professional judgement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89879,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in psychiatric treatment : the Royal College of Psychiatrists' journal of continuing professional development\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"351-357\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1192/APT.BP.112.010645\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in psychiatric treatment : the Royal College of Psychiatrists' journal of continuing professional development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1192/APT.BP.112.010645\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in psychiatric treatment : the Royal College of Psychiatrists' journal of continuing professional development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1192/APT.BP.112.010645","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

卫生部关于联合王国精神卫生服务风险管理和暴力预防的最佳做法准则强调了透明度和与服务使用者合作的重要性。康复哲学反映了服务使用者包容和在治疗中赋予权力的重要性。我们在一家安全程度中等和较低的医院的经验是,病人基本上被排除在风险评估过程之外。在本文中,我们描述了一个基于结构化专业判断的风险评估工具在使用中实现包容性和透明度的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achieving transparency in forensic risk assessment: a multimodal approach
SUMMARY The Department of Health’s best practice guidelines on risk management and violence prevention in UK mental health services highlight the importance of transparency and collaboration with service users. The recovery philosophy echoes the importance of service user inclusion and empowerment in treatment. Our experience in a medium and low secure hospital was that patients were largely excluded from the risk assessment process. In this article, we describe a model for achieving inclusion and transparency in the use of risk assessment tools based on structured professional judgement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信