妇女、宗教信仰和颠覆性地使用权力

C. Baxter
{"title":"妇女、宗教信仰和颠覆性地使用权力","authors":"C. Baxter","doi":"10.1179/175226909X12591470229034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article examines the actions of female religious orders to explore the scope available to them to exercise power in the French Counter-Reformation Church. It argues that while the Ursuline and Visitandine communities accepted enclosure, which affected their ability to undertake an active charitable role outside the cloister, they nonetheless consistently sought to carve out an active role for themselves that went beyond the traditional space accorded to nuns. These nuns actively sought roles as spiritual directors to women in their local communities, to clerics and to prominent courtiers. By exercising subversive power clandestinely, they succeeded in wielding significant influence, even over doctrinal matters. In contrast, Madame Guyon challenged the right of the ecclesiastical establishment to declare her writings heretical. Similarly, the Port-Royal nuns overtly challenged the commands of Pope and King, arguing that the dictates of conscience superseded the doctrinal judgements of the religious authorities. Such overtly subversive challenges were harshly punished by the religious establishment. This article concludes that the skill with which certain orders negotiated to expand their roles without constituting an overt challenge to authority should be recognised as an exercise of subversive yet effective power rather than as an unquestioning acceptance of patriarchal authority.","PeriodicalId":88312,"journal":{"name":"Seventeenth-century French studies","volume":"31 1","pages":"111 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/175226909X12591470229034","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Women, Religious Conviction and the Subversive Use of Power\",\"authors\":\"C. Baxter\",\"doi\":\"10.1179/175226909X12591470229034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article examines the actions of female religious orders to explore the scope available to them to exercise power in the French Counter-Reformation Church. It argues that while the Ursuline and Visitandine communities accepted enclosure, which affected their ability to undertake an active charitable role outside the cloister, they nonetheless consistently sought to carve out an active role for themselves that went beyond the traditional space accorded to nuns. These nuns actively sought roles as spiritual directors to women in their local communities, to clerics and to prominent courtiers. By exercising subversive power clandestinely, they succeeded in wielding significant influence, even over doctrinal matters. In contrast, Madame Guyon challenged the right of the ecclesiastical establishment to declare her writings heretical. Similarly, the Port-Royal nuns overtly challenged the commands of Pope and King, arguing that the dictates of conscience superseded the doctrinal judgements of the religious authorities. Such overtly subversive challenges were harshly punished by the religious establishment. This article concludes that the skill with which certain orders negotiated to expand their roles without constituting an overt challenge to authority should be recognised as an exercise of subversive yet effective power rather than as an unquestioning acceptance of patriarchal authority.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Seventeenth-century French studies\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"111 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1179/175226909X12591470229034\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Seventeenth-century French studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1179/175226909X12591470229034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seventeenth-century French studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1179/175226909X12591470229034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本文考察了法国反宗教改革教会中女性修会的行为,以探索她们行使权力的范围。它认为,虽然乌尔苏拉和维西坦丁社区接受了圈地,这影响了她们在修道院之外承担积极慈善角色的能力,但她们始终寻求为自己开辟一个积极的角色,超越了给予修女的传统空间。这些修女积极寻求成为当地社区女性、神职人员和杰出朝臣的精神导师。通过秘密地行使颠覆力量,他们成功地施加了重大影响,甚至在教义问题上。相比之下,盖恩夫人挑战了教会机构宣布她的作品为异端的权利。同样,皇家港的修女公然挑战教皇和国王的命令,认为良心的命令取代了宗教当局的教义判断。这种公然颠覆性的挑战受到了宗教机构的严厉惩罚。本文的结论是,某些秩序在不构成对权威的公然挑战的情况下,通过谈判扩大其角色的技能,应该被视为一种颠覆性的有效权力的行使,而不是对父权权威的毫无疑问的接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Women, Religious Conviction and the Subversive Use of Power
Abstract This article examines the actions of female religious orders to explore the scope available to them to exercise power in the French Counter-Reformation Church. It argues that while the Ursuline and Visitandine communities accepted enclosure, which affected their ability to undertake an active charitable role outside the cloister, they nonetheless consistently sought to carve out an active role for themselves that went beyond the traditional space accorded to nuns. These nuns actively sought roles as spiritual directors to women in their local communities, to clerics and to prominent courtiers. By exercising subversive power clandestinely, they succeeded in wielding significant influence, even over doctrinal matters. In contrast, Madame Guyon challenged the right of the ecclesiastical establishment to declare her writings heretical. Similarly, the Port-Royal nuns overtly challenged the commands of Pope and King, arguing that the dictates of conscience superseded the doctrinal judgements of the religious authorities. Such overtly subversive challenges were harshly punished by the religious establishment. This article concludes that the skill with which certain orders negotiated to expand their roles without constituting an overt challenge to authority should be recognised as an exercise of subversive yet effective power rather than as an unquestioning acceptance of patriarchal authority.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信