{"title":"神经性贪食症全科医生的心理健康素养。","authors":"P. Hay, C. D. Angelis, H. Millar, J. Mond","doi":"10.1185/135525706X56673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: The study's aims were to gain a better understanding of the bulimia nervosa mental health literacy (BN-MHL) of general practitioners (GPS), namely their beliefs about bulimia nervosa (BN) and its treatment, and to \ncompare these perceptions with those found in community women. \nMethods: A postal survey was sent to 304 city GPs. The survey comprised a fictional vignette of a woman with BN followed by questions about perceived prevalence, severity, management, aetiology and prognosis. \nResults: Of the 149 (49%) respondents, 95% identified the problem as an eating disorder, 51% specifying EN. Eighty percent considered it a very distressing problem and 70% considered it uncommon in their practice and very difficult \nto treat. Nearly half regarded a psychiatrist as the most helpful clinician. Eighty percent thought discrimination would occur if others knew about the problem. \nConclusion: GPs correctly identified BN and specialist treatment was favourably regarded. As found previously in surveys of the general population most GPs considered EN severe, distressing, and difficult to treat. The main \nlimitation of the study was the low response rate.","PeriodicalId":54586,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","volume":"10 1","pages":"103-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bulimia nervosa mental health literacy of general practitioners.\",\"authors\":\"P. Hay, C. D. Angelis, H. Millar, J. Mond\",\"doi\":\"10.1185/135525706X56673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: The study's aims were to gain a better understanding of the bulimia nervosa mental health literacy (BN-MHL) of general practitioners (GPS), namely their beliefs about bulimia nervosa (BN) and its treatment, and to \\ncompare these perceptions with those found in community women. \\nMethods: A postal survey was sent to 304 city GPs. The survey comprised a fictional vignette of a woman with BN followed by questions about perceived prevalence, severity, management, aetiology and prognosis. \\nResults: Of the 149 (49%) respondents, 95% identified the problem as an eating disorder, 51% specifying EN. Eighty percent considered it a very distressing problem and 70% considered it uncommon in their practice and very difficult \\nto treat. Nearly half regarded a psychiatrist as the most helpful clinician. Eighty percent thought discrimination would occur if others knew about the problem. \\nConclusion: GPs correctly identified BN and specialist treatment was favourably regarded. As found previously in surveys of the general population most GPs considered EN severe, distressing, and difficult to treat. The main \\nlimitation of the study was the low response rate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54586,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"103-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1185/135525706X56673\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care and Community Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1185/135525706X56673","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Bulimia nervosa mental health literacy of general practitioners.
Objectives: The study's aims were to gain a better understanding of the bulimia nervosa mental health literacy (BN-MHL) of general practitioners (GPS), namely their beliefs about bulimia nervosa (BN) and its treatment, and to
compare these perceptions with those found in community women.
Methods: A postal survey was sent to 304 city GPs. The survey comprised a fictional vignette of a woman with BN followed by questions about perceived prevalence, severity, management, aetiology and prognosis.
Results: Of the 149 (49%) respondents, 95% identified the problem as an eating disorder, 51% specifying EN. Eighty percent considered it a very distressing problem and 70% considered it uncommon in their practice and very difficult
to treat. Nearly half regarded a psychiatrist as the most helpful clinician. Eighty percent thought discrimination would occur if others knew about the problem.
Conclusion: GPs correctly identified BN and specialist treatment was favourably regarded. As found previously in surveys of the general population most GPs considered EN severe, distressing, and difficult to treat. The main
limitation of the study was the low response rate.