脚踏实地,昂首阔步

Richard van der Wurff
{"title":"脚踏实地,昂首阔步","authors":"Richard van der Wurff","doi":"10.1177/17480485020640050201","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"`Open societies' are democratic societies in which people act upon the belief that no one possesses the ultimate truth. This article reviews debates of communication scholars at four Expert Meetings on whether and how media can contribute to openness and democracy in societies in East and West. It argues that a balance of power between media and societal organizations and groups (advertisers, audiences, governments) is a necessary but not sufficient condition for media to be open and contribute to democracy. In addition, we need media professionals, media organizations and audiences to be internally motivated to aim for innovation, tolerance and appreciation of diversity. The article illustrates this argument with a discussion of the proclaimed empowering role of the Internet, and clarifies why it comes as no surprise that some patterns of Internet usage close off rather than open up an informed exchange of ideas and opinions. The article concludes with some suggestions for future research on media, the Internet and open societies.","PeriodicalId":84790,"journal":{"name":"Gazette","volume":"64 1","pages":"407 - 423"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17480485020640050201","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"With Two Feet On Firm Ground and Diverse Heads Up in the Air\",\"authors\":\"Richard van der Wurff\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17480485020640050201\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"`Open societies' are democratic societies in which people act upon the belief that no one possesses the ultimate truth. This article reviews debates of communication scholars at four Expert Meetings on whether and how media can contribute to openness and democracy in societies in East and West. It argues that a balance of power between media and societal organizations and groups (advertisers, audiences, governments) is a necessary but not sufficient condition for media to be open and contribute to democracy. In addition, we need media professionals, media organizations and audiences to be internally motivated to aim for innovation, tolerance and appreciation of diversity. The article illustrates this argument with a discussion of the proclaimed empowering role of the Internet, and clarifies why it comes as no surprise that some patterns of Internet usage close off rather than open up an informed exchange of ideas and opinions. The article concludes with some suggestions for future research on media, the Internet and open societies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gazette\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"407 - 423\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/17480485020640050201\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gazette\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640050201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gazette","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17480485020640050201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

“开放社会”是一种民主社会,在这种社会中,人们的行为都基于一种信念,即没有人拥有最终的真理。本文回顾了传播学学者在四次专家会议上就媒体是否以及如何促进东西方社会的开放和民主进行的辩论。它认为,媒体与社会组织和团体(广告商、观众、政府)之间的权力平衡是媒体开放和促进民主的必要条件,但不是充分条件。此外,我们需要媒体专业人员、媒体组织和受众在内部受到激励,以创新、宽容和欣赏多样性为目标。这篇文章通过对互联网所宣称的赋权作用的讨论阐明了这一论点,并阐明了为什么一些互联网使用模式关闭而不是开放思想和观点的知情交流并不令人惊讶。文章最后对媒体、互联网和开放社会的未来研究提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
With Two Feet On Firm Ground and Diverse Heads Up in the Air
`Open societies' are democratic societies in which people act upon the belief that no one possesses the ultimate truth. This article reviews debates of communication scholars at four Expert Meetings on whether and how media can contribute to openness and democracy in societies in East and West. It argues that a balance of power between media and societal organizations and groups (advertisers, audiences, governments) is a necessary but not sufficient condition for media to be open and contribute to democracy. In addition, we need media professionals, media organizations and audiences to be internally motivated to aim for innovation, tolerance and appreciation of diversity. The article illustrates this argument with a discussion of the proclaimed empowering role of the Internet, and clarifies why it comes as no surprise that some patterns of Internet usage close off rather than open up an informed exchange of ideas and opinions. The article concludes with some suggestions for future research on media, the Internet and open societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信