德国资格制度的“学院化”:德国职业培训与高等教育关系的最新发展

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andrä Wolter, Christian Kerst
{"title":"德国资格制度的“学院化”:德国职业培训与高等教育关系的最新发展","authors":"Andrä Wolter, Christian Kerst","doi":"10.1177/1745499915612188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The traditional German model of skill formation was based on the rather strict segmentation between vocational training and higher education. However, during recent years this differentiation has slowly dissolved, partly by politically motivated developments to increase the permeability between both sectors and partly as a result of latent changes in the participation in higher education leading to a higher degree of ‘academization’. After a short description and analysis of recent trends in higher education and vocational training, especially the expansion of higher education, the article focuses on two processes to achieve more permeability and cooperation between both parts of the German qualification system: (1) the introduction and extending of dual study programmes and (2) the opening of access to higher education for vocational qualified people without the usual school credentials (e.g. the Abitur). The article concludes with two scenarios regarding trends in the participation in higher education.","PeriodicalId":45946,"journal":{"name":"Research in Comparative and International Education","volume":"10 1","pages":"510 - 524"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1745499915612188","citationCount":"31","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ‘academization’ of the German qualification system: Recent developments in the relationships between vocational training and higher education in Germany\",\"authors\":\"Andrä Wolter, Christian Kerst\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1745499915612188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The traditional German model of skill formation was based on the rather strict segmentation between vocational training and higher education. However, during recent years this differentiation has slowly dissolved, partly by politically motivated developments to increase the permeability between both sectors and partly as a result of latent changes in the participation in higher education leading to a higher degree of ‘academization’. After a short description and analysis of recent trends in higher education and vocational training, especially the expansion of higher education, the article focuses on two processes to achieve more permeability and cooperation between both parts of the German qualification system: (1) the introduction and extending of dual study programmes and (2) the opening of access to higher education for vocational qualified people without the usual school credentials (e.g. the Abitur). The article concludes with two scenarios regarding trends in the participation in higher education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"510 - 524\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-10-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1745499915612188\",\"citationCount\":\"31\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Comparative and International Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499915612188\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Comparative and International Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499915612188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 31

摘要

传统的德国技能形成模式是建立在职业培训和高等教育之间相当严格的分割基础上的。然而,近年来,这种差异逐渐消失,部分原因是政治动机的发展增加了两个部门之间的渗透性,部分原因是参与高等教育的潜在变化导致了更高程度的“学院化”。在对高等教育和职业培训的最新趋势,特别是高等教育的扩张进行了简短的描述和分析之后,本文将重点放在两个过程上,以实现德国资格体系的两个部分之间的更大的渗透和合作:(1)引入和扩展双轨制学习计划;(2)向没有通常学校证书(例如Abitur)的职业合格人员开放接受高等教育的机会。文章总结了关于高等教育参与趋势的两种情景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The ‘academization’ of the German qualification system: Recent developments in the relationships between vocational training and higher education in Germany
The traditional German model of skill formation was based on the rather strict segmentation between vocational training and higher education. However, during recent years this differentiation has slowly dissolved, partly by politically motivated developments to increase the permeability between both sectors and partly as a result of latent changes in the participation in higher education leading to a higher degree of ‘academization’. After a short description and analysis of recent trends in higher education and vocational training, especially the expansion of higher education, the article focuses on two processes to achieve more permeability and cooperation between both parts of the German qualification system: (1) the introduction and extending of dual study programmes and (2) the opening of access to higher education for vocational qualified people without the usual school credentials (e.g. the Abitur). The article concludes with two scenarios regarding trends in the participation in higher education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Comparative and International Education
Research in Comparative and International Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Research in Comparative and International Education is a peer-reviewed international journal, edited by Hubert Ertl of the University of Oxford, assisted by an Editorial Board and an International Advisory Board of international scholars with a wide range of expertise in comparative and international studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信