《成功要素:抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性国际会议》节选,2003年12月4-7日,美国德克萨斯州达拉斯

R. Hewitt, K. Stewart
{"title":"《成功要素:抗逆转录病毒治疗依从性国际会议》节选,2003年12月4-7日,美国德克萨斯州达拉斯","authors":"R. Hewitt, K. Stewart","doi":"10.1177/154510970400300103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a nursing telephone intervention to help persons with HIV manage their adherence to HIV medications. The specific aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that there would be no difference in medication adherence between participants randomly assigned to receive usual patient education and support from clinic staff (the control group), and the intervention group to receive, in addition to the usual patient education and support, a telephone call (once a week for 12 weeks) that provides an individualized program of education, community referrals, and counseling. Methods: Participants were recruited by their caregivers (n=95), had the study explained to them, and gave informed consent. Adherence was measured by electronic caps and by self-report, as well as viral loads and CD4 counts. Participants were assigned to the intervention or control treatment group. Results: This was a Repeated Measures Design and follow-up data were difficult to collect because of difficulty in maintaining communication with participants over the four months of the study. Many subjects recruited at baseline were dropped from all analyses due to incomplete data, resulting in a sample size of 17 in the intervention group and 24 in the control group. For this reason, generalizations to the population of HIV subjects should not be made. Significant differences between groups within time point, or between time points within group were found for adherence using the cap as a measurement tool, viral load, CD4 counts, and adherence using the self-report as the measurement tool. The intervention group had significantly lower mean viral loads than the control group at both time point 1 (p = 0.0003) and time point 2 (p = 0.0030). For CD4 counts, differences between the intervention and control groups were seen. At time point 3 (p = 0.0021) the intervention group had significantly higher mean CD4 counts than the control group. Conclusions: In future research, phone disconnections will be countered with letters and with mailed phone cards. The researchers are developing the strategy of a closer working partnership with the clinic staff who make the appointments and who often have a relationship with the patients. Suggestions for future intervention strategies include the provision of cell phones for participants.","PeriodicalId":81716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care","volume":"3 1","pages":"12 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/154510970400300103","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Select Abstracts from Elements of Success: An International Conference on Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy, December 4-7, 2003, Dallas, Texas, USA\",\"authors\":\"R. Hewitt, K. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/154510970400300103\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a nursing telephone intervention to help persons with HIV manage their adherence to HIV medications. The specific aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that there would be no difference in medication adherence between participants randomly assigned to receive usual patient education and support from clinic staff (the control group), and the intervention group to receive, in addition to the usual patient education and support, a telephone call (once a week for 12 weeks) that provides an individualized program of education, community referrals, and counseling. Methods: Participants were recruited by their caregivers (n=95), had the study explained to them, and gave informed consent. Adherence was measured by electronic caps and by self-report, as well as viral loads and CD4 counts. Participants were assigned to the intervention or control treatment group. Results: This was a Repeated Measures Design and follow-up data were difficult to collect because of difficulty in maintaining communication with participants over the four months of the study. Many subjects recruited at baseline were dropped from all analyses due to incomplete data, resulting in a sample size of 17 in the intervention group and 24 in the control group. For this reason, generalizations to the population of HIV subjects should not be made. Significant differences between groups within time point, or between time points within group were found for adherence using the cap as a measurement tool, viral load, CD4 counts, and adherence using the self-report as the measurement tool. The intervention group had significantly lower mean viral loads than the control group at both time point 1 (p = 0.0003) and time point 2 (p = 0.0030). For CD4 counts, differences between the intervention and control groups were seen. At time point 3 (p = 0.0021) the intervention group had significantly higher mean CD4 counts than the control group. Conclusions: In future research, phone disconnections will be countered with letters and with mailed phone cards. The researchers are developing the strategy of a closer working partnership with the clinic staff who make the appointments and who often have a relationship with the patients. Suggestions for future intervention strategies include the provision of cell phones for participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":81716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"12 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/154510970400300103\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/154510970400300103\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International Association of Physicians in AIDS Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/154510970400300103","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是评估护理电话干预的有效性,以帮助HIV感染者管理他们对HIV药物的依从性。该研究的具体目的是检验一种假设,即随机分配接受常规患者教育和临床工作人员支持的参与者(对照组)和干预组之间的药物依从性没有差异,除了常规患者教育和支持外,干预组还接受电话(每周一次,持续12周),提供个性化的教育计划,社区转诊和咨询。方法:参与者由他们的照顾者招募(n=95),向他们解释研究,并给予知情同意。依从性是通过电子帽、自我报告、病毒载量和CD4计数来衡量的。参与者被分为干预组和对照组。结果:这是一个重复测量设计,由于在四个月的研究中与参与者保持沟通困难,随访数据难以收集。由于数据不完整,许多在基线时招募的受试者被排除在所有分析之外,导致干预组的样本量为17人,对照组为24人。因此,不应该对艾滋病毒感染人群进行概括。使用帽作为测量工具的依从性、病毒载量、CD4计数和使用自我报告作为测量工具的依从性在时间点内组间或组内时间点之间存在显著差异。干预组在时间点1 (p = 0.0003)和时间点2 (p = 0.0030)的平均病毒载量均显著低于对照组。对于CD4计数,干预组和对照组之间存在差异。在时间点3 (p = 0.0021),干预组的平均CD4计数明显高于对照组。结论:在未来的研究中,电话中断将通过信件和邮寄电话卡来应对。研究人员正在开发一种策略,即与诊所工作人员建立更紧密的合作关系,这些工作人员负责预约,并且经常与患者建立关系。对未来干预策略的建议包括为参与者提供手机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Select Abstracts from Elements of Success: An International Conference on Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy, December 4-7, 2003, Dallas, Texas, USA
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a nursing telephone intervention to help persons with HIV manage their adherence to HIV medications. The specific aim of the study was to test the hypothesis that there would be no difference in medication adherence between participants randomly assigned to receive usual patient education and support from clinic staff (the control group), and the intervention group to receive, in addition to the usual patient education and support, a telephone call (once a week for 12 weeks) that provides an individualized program of education, community referrals, and counseling. Methods: Participants were recruited by their caregivers (n=95), had the study explained to them, and gave informed consent. Adherence was measured by electronic caps and by self-report, as well as viral loads and CD4 counts. Participants were assigned to the intervention or control treatment group. Results: This was a Repeated Measures Design and follow-up data were difficult to collect because of difficulty in maintaining communication with participants over the four months of the study. Many subjects recruited at baseline were dropped from all analyses due to incomplete data, resulting in a sample size of 17 in the intervention group and 24 in the control group. For this reason, generalizations to the population of HIV subjects should not be made. Significant differences between groups within time point, or between time points within group were found for adherence using the cap as a measurement tool, viral load, CD4 counts, and adherence using the self-report as the measurement tool. The intervention group had significantly lower mean viral loads than the control group at both time point 1 (p = 0.0003) and time point 2 (p = 0.0030). For CD4 counts, differences between the intervention and control groups were seen. At time point 3 (p = 0.0021) the intervention group had significantly higher mean CD4 counts than the control group. Conclusions: In future research, phone disconnections will be countered with letters and with mailed phone cards. The researchers are developing the strategy of a closer working partnership with the clinic staff who make the appointments and who often have a relationship with the patients. Suggestions for future intervention strategies include the provision of cell phones for participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信