{"title":"信任问题","authors":"H. Merrett","doi":"10.1177/1356262216682113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An attendee at a patient safety conference recently asked the speakers whether we felt that the effect of being placed in special measures was so devastating to staff morale as to render improvements at the organisation in question almost impossible. This prompted me to think about trust and communications across the health community, and their role in facilitating – or blocking – the open and transparent culture that is surely a prerequisite to improving safety. Securing healthy levels of trust is made complex by the multiplicity of relationships between different stakeholders in that community. Within healthcare organisations, the challenge is considerable. In order to identify problems and then find and implement solutions to them, there is a need for staff to trust management; patients to trust healthcare professionals, and different groups of staff to trust each other. In most organisations, there will be varying levels of trust. Somewhere in the policies of all NHS institutions, you will almost certainly find a statement on openness and willingness to learn and improve, rather than to blame. When you ask staff how well this statement translates into practice, it is likely that responses will differ according to local circumstances or personalities, and, sadly, there is still ample evidence that many risks, concerns and failures go unreported. This is due to a range of issues, from lack of belief that anything will happen as a result of reporting, to fear of recriminations for calling practice into question. On the other hand, there are undoubtedly many clinical and other teams which actively learn from experience just as there are also NHS trusts where management has developed and maintained open and positive communications with staff. However, at the macro level, the expectations and behaviours of regulators, politicians and the media add another level of complexity to the challenge of encouraging an open culture which learns from experience and improves its practice. Sir Robert Francis spoke at the recent Annual Regulation Conference in Edinburgh on 31 October 2016 about the need to ‘‘rethink the regulator’s role in patient safety.’’ He told the Heath Service Journal (9th November 2016) of the need for liaison between regulators, a focus on systemic problems and the support and recognition of those who raise concerns in good faith. What marks his comments out, however, is the acknowledgment of the need to win the ‘‘trust and confidence’’ of the public in achieving real change. He suggests, for example:","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"22 1","pages":"44 - 45"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216682113","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A matter of trust\",\"authors\":\"H. Merrett\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262216682113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An attendee at a patient safety conference recently asked the speakers whether we felt that the effect of being placed in special measures was so devastating to staff morale as to render improvements at the organisation in question almost impossible. This prompted me to think about trust and communications across the health community, and their role in facilitating – or blocking – the open and transparent culture that is surely a prerequisite to improving safety. Securing healthy levels of trust is made complex by the multiplicity of relationships between different stakeholders in that community. Within healthcare organisations, the challenge is considerable. In order to identify problems and then find and implement solutions to them, there is a need for staff to trust management; patients to trust healthcare professionals, and different groups of staff to trust each other. In most organisations, there will be varying levels of trust. Somewhere in the policies of all NHS institutions, you will almost certainly find a statement on openness and willingness to learn and improve, rather than to blame. When you ask staff how well this statement translates into practice, it is likely that responses will differ according to local circumstances or personalities, and, sadly, there is still ample evidence that many risks, concerns and failures go unreported. This is due to a range of issues, from lack of belief that anything will happen as a result of reporting, to fear of recriminations for calling practice into question. On the other hand, there are undoubtedly many clinical and other teams which actively learn from experience just as there are also NHS trusts where management has developed and maintained open and positive communications with staff. However, at the macro level, the expectations and behaviours of regulators, politicians and the media add another level of complexity to the challenge of encouraging an open culture which learns from experience and improves its practice. Sir Robert Francis spoke at the recent Annual Regulation Conference in Edinburgh on 31 October 2016 about the need to ‘‘rethink the regulator’s role in patient safety.’’ He told the Heath Service Journal (9th November 2016) of the need for liaison between regulators, a focus on systemic problems and the support and recognition of those who raise concerns in good faith. What marks his comments out, however, is the acknowledgment of the need to win the ‘‘trust and confidence’’ of the public in achieving real change. He suggests, for example:\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"44 - 45\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216682113\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216682113\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216682113","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
最近,在一次病人安全会议上,一位与会者问发言者,我们是否觉得,采取特殊措施对员工士气的影响是如此之大,以至于使有关组织的改进几乎不可能。这促使我思考整个卫生界的信任和沟通,以及它们在促进或阻碍开放和透明文化方面的作用,而开放和透明文化无疑是改善安全的先决条件。该社区中不同利益攸关方之间关系的多样性使确保健康的信任水平变得复杂。在医疗机构中,挑战是相当大的。为了发现问题,然后找到并实施解决方案,员工需要信任管理层;病人要信任医护人员,不同群体的工作人员要相互信任。在大多数组织中,会有不同程度的信任。在所有NHS机构的政策中,你几乎肯定会发现一个关于开放和愿意学习和改进,而不是责备的声明。当你问员工这句话在实践中转化得如何时,他们的回答很可能会因当地情况或个性而有所不同。遗憾的是,仍有大量证据表明,许多风险、担忧和失败都没有得到报告。这是由于一系列的问题,从不相信任何事情都会因为报道而发生,到害怕质疑实践而受到指责。另一方面,毫无疑问,许多临床和其他团队积极地从经验中学习,就像NHS信托基金一样,管理层已经与员工建立并保持了开放和积极的沟通。然而,在宏观层面上,监管机构、政治家和媒体的期望和行为给鼓励一种从经验中学习并改进其实践的开放文化的挑战增加了另一层复杂性。在2016年10月31日于爱丁堡举行的年度监管会议上,Robert Francis爵士谈到了“重新思考监管机构在患者安全中的角色”的必要性。他告诉《健康服务杂志》(health Service Journal)(2016年11月9日),监管机构之间需要联络,关注系统性问题,并支持和认可那些真诚提出担忧的人。然而,他的言论的突出之处在于,他承认,要实现真正的变革,需要赢得公众的“信任和信心”。例如,他建议:
An attendee at a patient safety conference recently asked the speakers whether we felt that the effect of being placed in special measures was so devastating to staff morale as to render improvements at the organisation in question almost impossible. This prompted me to think about trust and communications across the health community, and their role in facilitating – or blocking – the open and transparent culture that is surely a prerequisite to improving safety. Securing healthy levels of trust is made complex by the multiplicity of relationships between different stakeholders in that community. Within healthcare organisations, the challenge is considerable. In order to identify problems and then find and implement solutions to them, there is a need for staff to trust management; patients to trust healthcare professionals, and different groups of staff to trust each other. In most organisations, there will be varying levels of trust. Somewhere in the policies of all NHS institutions, you will almost certainly find a statement on openness and willingness to learn and improve, rather than to blame. When you ask staff how well this statement translates into practice, it is likely that responses will differ according to local circumstances or personalities, and, sadly, there is still ample evidence that many risks, concerns and failures go unreported. This is due to a range of issues, from lack of belief that anything will happen as a result of reporting, to fear of recriminations for calling practice into question. On the other hand, there are undoubtedly many clinical and other teams which actively learn from experience just as there are also NHS trusts where management has developed and maintained open and positive communications with staff. However, at the macro level, the expectations and behaviours of regulators, politicians and the media add another level of complexity to the challenge of encouraging an open culture which learns from experience and improves its practice. Sir Robert Francis spoke at the recent Annual Regulation Conference in Edinburgh on 31 October 2016 about the need to ‘‘rethink the regulator’s role in patient safety.’’ He told the Heath Service Journal (9th November 2016) of the need for liaison between regulators, a focus on systemic problems and the support and recognition of those who raise concerns in good faith. What marks his comments out, however, is the acknowledgment of the need to win the ‘‘trust and confidence’’ of the public in achieving real change. He suggests, for example: