决策记录的进展是可悲的

B. Leigh
{"title":"决策记录的进展是可悲的","authors":"B. Leigh","doi":"10.1177/1356262216667164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The debate about the decision in Montgomery reveals a much deeper malaise in which hospital practice has failed to keep pace with a silent revolution in medical practice. The use of a Form recording that a patient consents to undergo an operation distracts doctors from the real problem, which is that patients need to undergo a formal training process to take any major decision about their healthcare. This training needs to be recorded for medical as well as legal reasons. It applies to decisions to use conservative therapy as well as surgery. The author describes what such a process might look like and how proper defensible records could be made.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"22 1","pages":"16 - 20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216667164","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Progress towards a decision record is lamentable\",\"authors\":\"B. Leigh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262216667164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The debate about the decision in Montgomery reveals a much deeper malaise in which hospital practice has failed to keep pace with a silent revolution in medical practice. The use of a Form recording that a patient consents to undergo an operation distracts doctors from the real problem, which is that patients need to undergo a formal training process to take any major decision about their healthcare. This training needs to be recorded for medical as well as legal reasons. It applies to decisions to use conservative therapy as well as surgery. The author describes what such a process might look like and how proper defensible records could be made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"16 - 20\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262216667164\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216667164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262216667164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

关于蒙哥马利决定的争论揭示了一个更深层次的问题,即医院的实践未能跟上医疗实践中无声革命的步伐。使用记录患者同意接受手术的表格会分散医生对真正问题的注意力,即患者需要经过正式的培训过程才能做出有关其医疗保健的任何重大决定。出于医疗和法律原因,这一培训需要进行记录。它适用于使用保守疗法和手术的决定。作者描述了这样一个过程可能是什么样子的,以及如何制作适当的可辩护记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Progress towards a decision record is lamentable
The debate about the decision in Montgomery reveals a much deeper malaise in which hospital practice has failed to keep pace with a silent revolution in medical practice. The use of a Form recording that a patient consents to undergo an operation distracts doctors from the real problem, which is that patients need to undergo a formal training process to take any major decision about their healthcare. This training needs to be recorded for medical as well as legal reasons. It applies to decisions to use conservative therapy as well as surgery. The author describes what such a process might look like and how proper defensible records could be made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信