{"title":"母亲精神伤害索赔失败:杰玛·鲍威尔诉圣乔治医疗保健NHS信托基金(高等法院,2014年12月10日- Simon Brown QC法官)","authors":"J. Mead","doi":"10.1177/1356262215591765b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This judgment is a clear demonstration of the fact that the claimant must prove her case on the balance of probabilities. Her expert had made a serious allegation of dishonesty against the treating surgeon but the judge held there was no evidence to substantiate it. The judge accepted that there were non-negligent explanations for the claimant’s various misfortunes. These were undoubtedly serious and unfortunate but they did not originate from surgical negligence.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"15 1","pages":"56 - 57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215591765b","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mother’s claim for Psychiatric Injury Fails:Gemma Powell v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust (High Court, 10 December 2014 – Judge Simon Brown QC)\",\"authors\":\"J. Mead\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262215591765b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This judgment is a clear demonstration of the fact that the claimant must prove her case on the balance of probabilities. Her expert had made a serious allegation of dishonesty against the treating surgeon but the judge held there was no evidence to substantiate it. The judge accepted that there were non-negligent explanations for the claimant’s various misfortunes. These were undoubtedly serious and unfortunate but they did not originate from surgical negligence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"56 - 57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215591765b\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215591765b\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215591765b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Mother’s claim for Psychiatric Injury Fails:Gemma Powell v St George’s Healthcare NHS Trust (High Court, 10 December 2014 – Judge Simon Brown QC)
This judgment is a clear demonstration of the fact that the claimant must prove her case on the balance of probabilities. Her expert had made a serious allegation of dishonesty against the treating surgeon but the judge held there was no evidence to substantiate it. The judge accepted that there were non-negligent explanations for the claimant’s various misfortunes. These were undoubtedly serious and unfortunate but they did not originate from surgical negligence.