BD诉皇家伍尔弗汉普顿医院NHS信托基金

Clinical risk Pub Date : 2015-03-01 DOI:10.1177/1356262215574782

A. Mellis

{"title":"BD诉皇家伍尔弗汉普顿医院NHS信托基金","authors":"A. Mellis","doi":"10.1177/1356262215574782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A claim for clinical negligence arising out of a failure to diagnose appendicitis was assisted by the misunderstanding of the Defendant's expert of his role as an expert witness, NHS Direct call recordings allowing the judge to hear the pain in the Claimant's voice, and the inherent defects in the treating doctor's note.","PeriodicalId":89664,"journal":{"name":"Clinical risk","volume":"21 1","pages":"50 - 52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215574782","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BD v The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust\",\"authors\":\"A. Mellis\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1356262215574782\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A claim for clinical negligence arising out of a failure to diagnose appendicitis was assisted by the misunderstanding of the Defendant's expert of his role as an expert witness, NHS Direct call recordings allowing the judge to hear the pain in the Claimant's voice, and the inherent defects in the treating doctor's note.\",\"PeriodicalId\":89664,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical risk\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"50 - 52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1356262215574782\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215574782\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical risk","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1356262215574782","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

由于未能诊断阑尾炎而引起的临床疏忽索赔，被告的专家对其作为专家证人的角色的误解，NHS直接通话录音允许法官听到索赔人声音中的痛苦，以及治疗医生笔记中的固有缺陷。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

BD v The Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust

A claim for clinical negligence arising out of a failure to diagnose appendicitis was assisted by the misunderstanding of the Defendant's expert of his role as an expert witness, NHS Direct call recordings allowing the judge to hear the pain in the Claimant's voice, and the inherent defects in the treating doctor's note.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Clinical risk

自引率

0.00%

发文量