动态的高绩效移植团队:信任、人才和协作

S. Campbell
{"title":"动态的高绩效移植团队:信任、人才和协作","authors":"S. Campbell","doi":"10.1177/090591999900900101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"F areas in healthcare depend on multidisciplinary collaboration more than transplantation. Whether in procurement or clinical practice, transplantation achieves its best results when team members share a focus and mission for implementing goals. High performance teams are characterized as those with clearly defined roles and expectations, in which the members value their diversity.2 In a patient selection committee, for example, the diversity of the multidisciplinary team is clearly evident. Physicians, transplant coordinators, social workers, psychologists, pharmacists, dietitians, and ethicists: each facilitates the decision-making process. Although their decisions are not always unanimous, a consensus can be reached. Trust is implicit in dynamic teamwork. Obstacles to efficient teamwork may include poor communication, distrust, personal competition, differences in goals and values, lack of team leadership, and lack of systems support from the organization. Among transplant teams, the frequency of interactions and the diversity of disciplines create a great potential for conflict.2 The perspective of a clinician who focuses on the physiologic need for transplantation versus the perspective of a social worker or psychologist who focuses on the psychosocial warnings can vary greatly. Teamwork requires individuals who understand that grandstand behaviors block effectiveness. Synergy arises only when individual talents work collaboratively and respectfully. The true value of teamwork is that the outcome is greater than the individual contributions. In a society that emphasizes individuality and independence, it is not always easy to achieve the mindset and skillset of the interdependence required of our transplant teams.3 Add to this the organizational structure and system of a hospital environment that may not support the goals or intricate needs of transplantation, and you have identified some of the challenges. Clinical transplant teams functioning in a hospital environment are self-managed, self-directed autonomous groups that may not communicate effectively within the organizational structure. Most transplant team members do not serve on hospital committees, where assignments may include facilitation of intradepartmental communication. This may contribute to the lack of understanding of team needs. Interestingly, most hospitals have several transplant teams that do not communicate with one another, serving almost as separate fiefdoms within the organization. Few hospitals have established a department of transplantation or a patient care center for transplantation where the leadership from each team is represented in a steering committee or council. More often, the teams function separately under individual departments such as cardiology, surgery, or hepatology. Programs structured within a transplant center have teams that function within a greater team concept. This design seems to promote a strength of unity that is conducive to communication within the organization and that can convey transplant issues to hospital administration. The culture of a team evolves over time. Most teams develop patterns of behavior that identify their culture. Power distribution, communication patterns, discussion topics, and conflict management exemplify behavior patterns reflecting a team’s culture.4 As personnel change, the balance shifts and new individuals must determine how their role fits and if their expectations meet with those of the team. Finding the fit in an established culture may be problematic for both new and experienced team members. How a team is structured and how it functions usually depend on the institutional culture as well as the team culture. New members must analyze their place and work within the group to develop mutual trust, and this often takes time. Decision making for clinical transplant teams extends far beyond the patient selection committee. Plans for pretransplant and posttransplant care are developed through the dynamic team process. Trust—a strong component of an effective transplant team—will ultimately translate into successful outcomes, individual satisfaction, and synergy. It is this type of teamwork that promotes dynamic high performance teams with successful outcomes.","PeriodicalId":79507,"journal":{"name":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","volume":"28 1","pages":"9 - 9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900101","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic High Performance Transplant Teams: Trust, Talent, and Collaboration\",\"authors\":\"S. Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/090591999900900101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"F areas in healthcare depend on multidisciplinary collaboration more than transplantation. Whether in procurement or clinical practice, transplantation achieves its best results when team members share a focus and mission for implementing goals. High performance teams are characterized as those with clearly defined roles and expectations, in which the members value their diversity.2 In a patient selection committee, for example, the diversity of the multidisciplinary team is clearly evident. Physicians, transplant coordinators, social workers, psychologists, pharmacists, dietitians, and ethicists: each facilitates the decision-making process. Although their decisions are not always unanimous, a consensus can be reached. Trust is implicit in dynamic teamwork. Obstacles to efficient teamwork may include poor communication, distrust, personal competition, differences in goals and values, lack of team leadership, and lack of systems support from the organization. Among transplant teams, the frequency of interactions and the diversity of disciplines create a great potential for conflict.2 The perspective of a clinician who focuses on the physiologic need for transplantation versus the perspective of a social worker or psychologist who focuses on the psychosocial warnings can vary greatly. Teamwork requires individuals who understand that grandstand behaviors block effectiveness. Synergy arises only when individual talents work collaboratively and respectfully. The true value of teamwork is that the outcome is greater than the individual contributions. In a society that emphasizes individuality and independence, it is not always easy to achieve the mindset and skillset of the interdependence required of our transplant teams.3 Add to this the organizational structure and system of a hospital environment that may not support the goals or intricate needs of transplantation, and you have identified some of the challenges. Clinical transplant teams functioning in a hospital environment are self-managed, self-directed autonomous groups that may not communicate effectively within the organizational structure. Most transplant team members do not serve on hospital committees, where assignments may include facilitation of intradepartmental communication. This may contribute to the lack of understanding of team needs. Interestingly, most hospitals have several transplant teams that do not communicate with one another, serving almost as separate fiefdoms within the organization. Few hospitals have established a department of transplantation or a patient care center for transplantation where the leadership from each team is represented in a steering committee or council. More often, the teams function separately under individual departments such as cardiology, surgery, or hepatology. Programs structured within a transplant center have teams that function within a greater team concept. This design seems to promote a strength of unity that is conducive to communication within the organization and that can convey transplant issues to hospital administration. The culture of a team evolves over time. Most teams develop patterns of behavior that identify their culture. Power distribution, communication patterns, discussion topics, and conflict management exemplify behavior patterns reflecting a team’s culture.4 As personnel change, the balance shifts and new individuals must determine how their role fits and if their expectations meet with those of the team. Finding the fit in an established culture may be problematic for both new and experienced team members. How a team is structured and how it functions usually depend on the institutional culture as well as the team culture. New members must analyze their place and work within the group to develop mutual trust, and this often takes time. Decision making for clinical transplant teams extends far beyond the patient selection committee. Plans for pretransplant and posttransplant care are developed through the dynamic team process. Trust—a strong component of an effective transplant team—will ultimately translate into successful outcomes, individual satisfaction, and synergy. It is this type of teamwork that promotes dynamic high performance teams with successful outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79507,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"9 - 9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/090591999900900101\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of transplant coordination : official publication of the North American Transplant Coordinators Organization (NATCO)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/090591999900900101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

医疗保健领域更依赖多学科合作而不是移植。无论是在采购还是临床实践中,当团队成员有共同的焦点和使命来实现目标时,移植都能达到最佳效果。高绩效团队的特点是具有明确定义的角色和期望,其中成员重视他们的多样性例如,在患者选择委员会中,多学科团队的多样性是显而易见的。医生、移植协调员、社会工作者、心理学家、药剂师、营养师和伦理学家:每个人都有助于决策过程。虽然他们的决定并不总是一致的,但可以达成共识。信任隐含在充满活力的团队合作中。有效团队合作的障碍可能包括沟通不畅、不信任、个人竞争、目标和价值观的差异、缺乏团队领导能力以及缺乏组织的系统支持。在移植团队中,互动的频率和学科的多样性创造了巨大的冲突潜力侧重于移植生理需求的临床医生的观点与侧重于心理社会警告的社会工作者或心理学家的观点可能会有很大差异。团队合作需要个人明白高调的行为会阻碍效率。只有当个人才能相互协作和尊重时,协同作用才会产生。团队合作的真正价值在于结果大于个人贡献。在一个强调个性和独立的社会中,要达到我们的移植团队所需要的相互依赖的心态和技能并不总是容易的再加上医院环境的组织结构和系统可能不支持移植的目标或复杂的需求,你已经确定了一些挑战。在医院环境中运作的临床移植团队是自我管理、自我指导的自治团体,在组织结构内可能无法有效沟通。大多数移植团队成员不在医院委员会任职,医院委员会的任务可能包括促进部门内的沟通。这可能会导致缺乏对团队需求的理解。有趣的是,大多数医院都有几个移植团队,他们彼此之间不交流,几乎是在组织内部各自独立的领域。很少有医院建立了移植科或移植病人护理中心,每个小组的领导都在指导委员会或理事会中有代表。更常见的情况是,这些小组分别在各个科室(如心脏病科、外科或肝病科)下运作。移植中心内的项目有团队,他们在一个更大的团队概念中运作。这种设计似乎促进了一种团结的力量,有利于组织内部的沟通,并可以向医院管理层传达移植问题。一个团队的文化会随着时间的推移而发展。大多数团队都会发展出能够识别其文化的行为模式。权力分配、沟通模式、讨论主题和冲突管理是反映团队文化的行为模式的例子随着人员变动,平衡也会发生变化,新人必须确定他们的角色是否合适,以及他们的期望是否与团队的期望相符。对于新成员和经验丰富的团队成员来说,在一个既定的文化中找到合适的位置可能都是一个问题。团队的结构和功能通常取决于机构文化和团队文化。新成员必须分析他们的位置,并在团队中工作以建立相互信任,这通常需要时间。临床移植团队的决策远远超出了患者选择委员会。移植前和移植后的护理计划是通过动态的团队过程制定的。信任是一个有效移植团队的重要组成部分,最终将转化为成功的结果、个人满意度和协同效应。正是这种类型的团队合作促进了充满活力的高绩效团队和成功的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dynamic High Performance Transplant Teams: Trust, Talent, and Collaboration
F areas in healthcare depend on multidisciplinary collaboration more than transplantation. Whether in procurement or clinical practice, transplantation achieves its best results when team members share a focus and mission for implementing goals. High performance teams are characterized as those with clearly defined roles and expectations, in which the members value their diversity.2 In a patient selection committee, for example, the diversity of the multidisciplinary team is clearly evident. Physicians, transplant coordinators, social workers, psychologists, pharmacists, dietitians, and ethicists: each facilitates the decision-making process. Although their decisions are not always unanimous, a consensus can be reached. Trust is implicit in dynamic teamwork. Obstacles to efficient teamwork may include poor communication, distrust, personal competition, differences in goals and values, lack of team leadership, and lack of systems support from the organization. Among transplant teams, the frequency of interactions and the diversity of disciplines create a great potential for conflict.2 The perspective of a clinician who focuses on the physiologic need for transplantation versus the perspective of a social worker or psychologist who focuses on the psychosocial warnings can vary greatly. Teamwork requires individuals who understand that grandstand behaviors block effectiveness. Synergy arises only when individual talents work collaboratively and respectfully. The true value of teamwork is that the outcome is greater than the individual contributions. In a society that emphasizes individuality and independence, it is not always easy to achieve the mindset and skillset of the interdependence required of our transplant teams.3 Add to this the organizational structure and system of a hospital environment that may not support the goals or intricate needs of transplantation, and you have identified some of the challenges. Clinical transplant teams functioning in a hospital environment are self-managed, self-directed autonomous groups that may not communicate effectively within the organizational structure. Most transplant team members do not serve on hospital committees, where assignments may include facilitation of intradepartmental communication. This may contribute to the lack of understanding of team needs. Interestingly, most hospitals have several transplant teams that do not communicate with one another, serving almost as separate fiefdoms within the organization. Few hospitals have established a department of transplantation or a patient care center for transplantation where the leadership from each team is represented in a steering committee or council. More often, the teams function separately under individual departments such as cardiology, surgery, or hepatology. Programs structured within a transplant center have teams that function within a greater team concept. This design seems to promote a strength of unity that is conducive to communication within the organization and that can convey transplant issues to hospital administration. The culture of a team evolves over time. Most teams develop patterns of behavior that identify their culture. Power distribution, communication patterns, discussion topics, and conflict management exemplify behavior patterns reflecting a team’s culture.4 As personnel change, the balance shifts and new individuals must determine how their role fits and if their expectations meet with those of the team. Finding the fit in an established culture may be problematic for both new and experienced team members. How a team is structured and how it functions usually depend on the institutional culture as well as the team culture. New members must analyze their place and work within the group to develop mutual trust, and this often takes time. Decision making for clinical transplant teams extends far beyond the patient selection committee. Plans for pretransplant and posttransplant care are developed through the dynamic team process. Trust—a strong component of an effective transplant team—will ultimately translate into successful outcomes, individual satisfaction, and synergy. It is this type of teamwork that promotes dynamic high performance teams with successful outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信