书评:祛魅与世俗化叙事:批判马克斯·韦伯的现代性思想

IF 0.7 0 RELIGION
W. Goldstein
{"title":"书评:祛魅与世俗化叙事:批判马克斯·韦伯的现代性思想","authors":"W. Goldstein","doi":"10.1177/20503032231174215","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"aware of this (as was Ali Shariati later as an intellectual in exile who prepared the way for the 1979 revolution). Further research into this stereotyping Orientalist ideology could further illuminate how Western imperial powers have for generations been evoking revolutionary movements among supposedly “backward” peoples, particularly among Shi’ite and Sunni Muslims in Iran, Iraq, Egypt, etc. Are scholars of the “Middle East” investigating the ways in which the intensification of Orientalism, for example, in Samuel P. Huntington’s “Clash of Civilization” ideology, has been generating further ferment in majority Muslim countries? The revolutionary ideology and movements that came together in the Constitutional Revolution did not simply subside and disappear after the Pahlavi regime consolidated its power in Iran. Aslan’s book offers a lively sketch of the players in that coalition whose continuing operation or transformation could be traced toward their reemergence in the 1950s and early 1960s as a new elected parliament that, under the leadership of Mohammad Mosadegh, boldly nationalized oil reserves and oil–production in 1963. This led to the CIA overthrow of Mossadegh and the new parliamentary government and the consolidation of power by the Shah sponsored by the US government. This government replaced British imperial control of Iran with systematic suppression of a burgeoning civil society that had enabled the reemergence of a nascent democracy. An elementary knowledge of Shi’a Islam enables the recognition that the US stumbled right into the role of the oppressive Yazid and even became the embodiment of the “Great Satan.” Now that Iranians are again protesting tyrannical suppression of their rights, in this case by an oppressive Shi’ite hierocracy, it would be helpful to understand the various oppositional groups and forces in Iran, including strands of Shi’ite Islam other than the currently entrenched “Supreme Leadership.”","PeriodicalId":43214,"journal":{"name":"Critical Research on Religion","volume":"11 1","pages":"250 - 254"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber’s Idea of Modernity\",\"authors\":\"W. Goldstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/20503032231174215\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"aware of this (as was Ali Shariati later as an intellectual in exile who prepared the way for the 1979 revolution). Further research into this stereotyping Orientalist ideology could further illuminate how Western imperial powers have for generations been evoking revolutionary movements among supposedly “backward” peoples, particularly among Shi’ite and Sunni Muslims in Iran, Iraq, Egypt, etc. Are scholars of the “Middle East” investigating the ways in which the intensification of Orientalism, for example, in Samuel P. Huntington’s “Clash of Civilization” ideology, has been generating further ferment in majority Muslim countries? The revolutionary ideology and movements that came together in the Constitutional Revolution did not simply subside and disappear after the Pahlavi regime consolidated its power in Iran. Aslan’s book offers a lively sketch of the players in that coalition whose continuing operation or transformation could be traced toward their reemergence in the 1950s and early 1960s as a new elected parliament that, under the leadership of Mohammad Mosadegh, boldly nationalized oil reserves and oil–production in 1963. This led to the CIA overthrow of Mossadegh and the new parliamentary government and the consolidation of power by the Shah sponsored by the US government. This government replaced British imperial control of Iran with systematic suppression of a burgeoning civil society that had enabled the reemergence of a nascent democracy. An elementary knowledge of Shi’a Islam enables the recognition that the US stumbled right into the role of the oppressive Yazid and even became the embodiment of the “Great Satan.” Now that Iranians are again protesting tyrannical suppression of their rights, in this case by an oppressive Shi’ite hierocracy, it would be helpful to understand the various oppositional groups and forces in Iran, including strands of Shi’ite Islam other than the currently entrenched “Supreme Leadership.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":43214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Research on Religion\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"250 - 254\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Research on Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032231174215\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Research on Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503032231174215","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

意识到这一点(阿里·沙里亚蒂后来作为流亡的知识分子为1979年的革命铺平了道路)。对这种刻板的东方主义意识形态的进一步研究,可以进一步阐明西方帝国主义是如何在几代人的时间里,在所谓的“落后”民族中唤起革命运动的,尤其是在伊朗、伊拉克、埃及等地的什叶派和逊尼派穆斯林中。“中东”学者是否在调查东方主义的强化,比如塞缪尔·亨廷顿(Samuel P. Huntington)的“文明冲突”(Clash of Civilization)意识形态,是如何在穆斯林占多数的国家中进一步发酵的?在巴列维政权巩固其在伊朗的权力后,在宪法革命中聚集在一起的革命思想和运动并没有简单地消退和消失。阿斯兰的书生动地描绘了这个联盟的参与者,他们的持续运作或转型可以追溯到20世纪50年代和60年代初,作为一个新的民选议会的重新出现,在穆罕默德·摩萨台的领导下,1963年大胆地将石油储备和石油生产国有化。这导致了中央情报局推翻了摩萨德和新的议会政府,以及由美国政府支持的沙阿巩固了权力。这个政府取代了大英帝国对伊朗的控制,系统地镇压了一个迅速发展的公民社会,使新生的民主得以重新出现。对什叶派伊斯兰教的基本了解使我们认识到,美国误入了压迫性的亚兹德人的角色,甚至成为了“大撒旦”的化身。现在,伊朗人再次抗议对他们权利的暴虐压制,这次是什叶派的专制统治,了解伊朗的各种反对团体和力量,包括目前根深蒂固的“最高领导层”以外的什叶派伊斯兰教派别,将会有所帮助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Narratives of Disenchantment and Secularization: Critiquing Max Weber’s Idea of Modernity
aware of this (as was Ali Shariati later as an intellectual in exile who prepared the way for the 1979 revolution). Further research into this stereotyping Orientalist ideology could further illuminate how Western imperial powers have for generations been evoking revolutionary movements among supposedly “backward” peoples, particularly among Shi’ite and Sunni Muslims in Iran, Iraq, Egypt, etc. Are scholars of the “Middle East” investigating the ways in which the intensification of Orientalism, for example, in Samuel P. Huntington’s “Clash of Civilization” ideology, has been generating further ferment in majority Muslim countries? The revolutionary ideology and movements that came together in the Constitutional Revolution did not simply subside and disappear after the Pahlavi regime consolidated its power in Iran. Aslan’s book offers a lively sketch of the players in that coalition whose continuing operation or transformation could be traced toward their reemergence in the 1950s and early 1960s as a new elected parliament that, under the leadership of Mohammad Mosadegh, boldly nationalized oil reserves and oil–production in 1963. This led to the CIA overthrow of Mossadegh and the new parliamentary government and the consolidation of power by the Shah sponsored by the US government. This government replaced British imperial control of Iran with systematic suppression of a burgeoning civil society that had enabled the reemergence of a nascent democracy. An elementary knowledge of Shi’a Islam enables the recognition that the US stumbled right into the role of the oppressive Yazid and even became the embodiment of the “Great Satan.” Now that Iranians are again protesting tyrannical suppression of their rights, in this case by an oppressive Shi’ite hierocracy, it would be helpful to understand the various oppositional groups and forces in Iran, including strands of Shi’ite Islam other than the currently entrenched “Supreme Leadership.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Critical Research on Religion is a peer-reviewed, international journal focusing on the development of a critical theoretical framework and its application to research on religion. It provides a common venue for those engaging in critical analysis in theology and religious studies, as well as for those who critically study religion in the other social sciences and humanities such as philosophy, sociology, anthropology, psychology, history, and literature. A critical approach examines religious phenomena according to both their positive and negative impacts. It draws on methods including but not restricted to the critical theory of the Frankfurt School, Marxism, post-structuralism, feminism, psychoanalysis, ideological criticism, post-colonialism, ecocriticism, and queer studies. The journal seeks to enhance an understanding of how religious institutions and religious thought may simultaneously serve as a source of domination and progressive social change. It attempts to understand the role of religion within social and political conflicts. These conflicts are often based on differences of race, class, ethnicity, region, gender, and sexual orientation – all of which are shaped by social, political, and economic inequity. The journal encourages submissions of theoretically guided articles on current issues as well as those with historical interest using a wide range of methodologies including qualitative, quantitative, and archival. It publishes articles, review essays, book reviews, thematic issues, symposia, and interviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信