财务报表法定审计质量控制框架:美国、英国和印度的比较研究

Q3 Business, Management and Accounting
S. Saha, M. Roy
{"title":"财务报表法定审计质量控制框架:美国、英国和印度的比较研究","authors":"S. Saha, M. Roy","doi":"10.1177/0974686216668458","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Quality control of audit procedure has become extremely important in today’s corporate environment in the backdrop of accounting irregularities and audit failures leading to corporate demise. Accounting firms control the quality of audit procedure with the help of the quality control standard (QCS) and specific auditing standard. These standards provide reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable regulation and issuance of the appropriate report by the engagement team. After discussing the international scenario of quality control framework, in this study a comparative analysis of quality control policies and procedures at firm and engagement in three select countries has been presented. The countries selected are the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and India. The study finds that the QCS and the auditing standard in all three countries are designed in line with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and International Standards on Quality Control (ISQC)-1. Naturally, quality control policies and procedures in three countries are comparable barring few minor differences. Based on these differences, it can be concluded that the quality control framework in the UK and India is more stringent as compared to the USA.","PeriodicalId":37340,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Corporate Governance","volume":"9 1","pages":"186 - 211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0974686216668458","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality Control Framework for Statutory Audit of Financial Statements: A Comparative Study of USA, UK and India\",\"authors\":\"S. Saha, M. Roy\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0974686216668458\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Quality control of audit procedure has become extremely important in today’s corporate environment in the backdrop of accounting irregularities and audit failures leading to corporate demise. Accounting firms control the quality of audit procedure with the help of the quality control standard (QCS) and specific auditing standard. These standards provide reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable regulation and issuance of the appropriate report by the engagement team. After discussing the international scenario of quality control framework, in this study a comparative analysis of quality control policies and procedures at firm and engagement in three select countries has been presented. The countries selected are the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and India. The study finds that the QCS and the auditing standard in all three countries are designed in line with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and International Standards on Quality Control (ISQC)-1. Naturally, quality control policies and procedures in three countries are comparable barring few minor differences. Based on these differences, it can be concluded that the quality control framework in the UK and India is more stringent as compared to the USA.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Corporate Governance\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"186 - 211\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0974686216668458\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Corporate Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686216668458\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Corporate Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0974686216668458","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在会计违规和审计失败导致企业倒闭的当今企业环境下,审计程序的质量控制变得极其重要。会计师事务所通过质量控制标准(QCS)和具体审计标准来控制审计程序的质量。这些标准为审计项目组遵守适用的法规和发布适当的报告提供了合理的保证。在讨论了质量控制框架的国际情景之后,本研究对三个选定国家的公司和企业的质量控制政策和程序进行了比较分析。选定的国家是美利坚合众国(USA)、联合王国(UK)和印度。研究发现,这三个国家的质量控制体系和审计标准都是按照国际审计标准(isa)和国际质量控制标准(ISQC)-1设计的。当然,三个国家的质量控制政策和程序具有可比性,除非有一些细微的差别。基于这些差异,可以得出结论,与美国相比,英国和印度的质量控制框架更为严格。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quality Control Framework for Statutory Audit of Financial Statements: A Comparative Study of USA, UK and India
Abstract Quality control of audit procedure has become extremely important in today’s corporate environment in the backdrop of accounting irregularities and audit failures leading to corporate demise. Accounting firms control the quality of audit procedure with the help of the quality control standard (QCS) and specific auditing standard. These standards provide reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable regulation and issuance of the appropriate report by the engagement team. After discussing the international scenario of quality control framework, in this study a comparative analysis of quality control policies and procedures at firm and engagement in three select countries has been presented. The countries selected are the United States of America (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and India. The study finds that the QCS and the auditing standard in all three countries are designed in line with International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and International Standards on Quality Control (ISQC)-1. Naturally, quality control policies and procedures in three countries are comparable barring few minor differences. Based on these differences, it can be concluded that the quality control framework in the UK and India is more stringent as compared to the USA.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Corporate Governance
Indian Journal of Corporate Governance Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Indian Journal of Corporate Governance is a bi-annual refereed journal that provides a forum for discussions and exchanging views on a wide range of corporate governance issues ranging from board practices, independent directors, whistle blower policies and shareholder activism on one hand to media’s role in corporate governance, corporate social responsibility and sustainability reporting on the other. It comprises of research articles, concept papers, case studies and reports providing a blend of theory and practices of corporate governance globally to cater to the interests of practitioners, academics, researchers and policy makers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信