n -乙酰半胱氨酸对慢性肾功能不全冠脉造影患者血清肌酐浓度的影响

M. Agrawal, Anna M. Wodlinger, Chad E. Huggins, G. Tudor, J. Pieper, K. O’Reilly, Cynthia J. Denu-Ciocca, G. Stouffer, E. Ohman
{"title":"n -乙酰半胱氨酸对慢性肾功能不全冠脉造影患者血清肌酐浓度的影响","authors":"M. Agrawal, Anna M. Wodlinger, Chad E. Huggins, G. Tudor, J. Pieper, K. O’Reilly, Cynthia J. Denu-Ciocca, G. Stouffer, E. Ohman","doi":"10.1159/000077294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Prior studies have produced conflicting results on whether N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduces the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA). The dosing regimens of NAC in these studies seemed impractical for everyday clinical practice. Objective:We studied the effect of NAC, with a novel dosing strategy, on serum creatinine concentration (SCr), and the incidence of CIN, in patients who were undergoing CA and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Twenty-five subjects with baseline renal insufficiency who were undergoing CA and/or PCI were randomized to either NAC or placebo.The treatment schedule was 800 mg of NAC 12 h prior to angiography, 600 mg of NAC 2 h prior to angiography, and 600 mg of NAC 6 h after angiography or matching placebo. All subjects were hydrated with 1 ml/kg of 0.45% saline and received non-ionic contrast for angiography. The primary endpoint was change in SCr and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of CIN as defined by an increase of 0.5 mg/dl or 25% in SCr at 48 h. Results:The average SCr at enrollment was 1.7 mg/dl and average dye exposure was 171 ml. The average change in SCr in the NAC and placebo groups was 0.14 and 0.06 mg/dl, respectively (p = 0.60). The incidence of CIN was 18 and 14% in the NAC and placebo groups, respectively (p = 1.0). Conclusion: In this small study, there was no significant difference in the change inSCr nor the incidence of CIN in patients with baseline renal insufficiency undergoing CA and/or PCI who were treated with NAC or placebo.","PeriodicalId":87985,"journal":{"name":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","volume":"4 1","pages":"87 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000077294","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Serum Creatinine Concentration in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency Who Are Undergoing Coronary Angiography\",\"authors\":\"M. Agrawal, Anna M. Wodlinger, Chad E. Huggins, G. Tudor, J. Pieper, K. O’Reilly, Cynthia J. Denu-Ciocca, G. Stouffer, E. Ohman\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000077294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Prior studies have produced conflicting results on whether N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduces the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA). The dosing regimens of NAC in these studies seemed impractical for everyday clinical practice. Objective:We studied the effect of NAC, with a novel dosing strategy, on serum creatinine concentration (SCr), and the incidence of CIN, in patients who were undergoing CA and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Twenty-five subjects with baseline renal insufficiency who were undergoing CA and/or PCI were randomized to either NAC or placebo.The treatment schedule was 800 mg of NAC 12 h prior to angiography, 600 mg of NAC 2 h prior to angiography, and 600 mg of NAC 6 h after angiography or matching placebo. All subjects were hydrated with 1 ml/kg of 0.45% saline and received non-ionic contrast for angiography. The primary endpoint was change in SCr and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of CIN as defined by an increase of 0.5 mg/dl or 25% in SCr at 48 h. Results:The average SCr at enrollment was 1.7 mg/dl and average dye exposure was 171 ml. The average change in SCr in the NAC and placebo groups was 0.14 and 0.06 mg/dl, respectively (p = 0.60). The incidence of CIN was 18 and 14% in the NAC and placebo groups, respectively (p = 1.0). Conclusion: In this small study, there was no significant difference in the change inSCr nor the incidence of CIN in patients with baseline renal insufficiency undergoing CA and/or PCI who were treated with NAC or placebo.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"87 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000077294\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000077294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000077294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

背景:关于n -乙酰半胱氨酸(NAC)是否降低冠状动脉造影(CA)患者造影剂肾病(CIN)的发生率,先前的研究产生了相互矛盾的结果。这些研究中NAC的给药方案在日常临床实践中似乎是不切实际的。目的:研究新型给药策略下NAC对行CA和/或经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)患者血清肌酐浓度(SCr)和CIN发生率的影响。方法:25名基线肾功能不全的患者接受CA和/或PCI,随机分为NAC组和安慰剂组。治疗方案为血管造影前12小时800 mg NAC,造影前2小时600 mg NAC,造影后6小时600 mg NAC或配套安慰剂。所有受试者均以1 ml/kg 0.45%生理盐水水化,并接受非离子造影剂进行血管造影。主要终点是SCr的变化,次要终点是CIN的发生率,定义为48小时SCr增加0.5 mg/dl或25%。结果:入组时的平均SCr为1.7 mg/dl,平均染料暴露为171 ml。NAC组和安慰剂组的SCr平均变化分别为0.14和0.06 mg/dl (p = 0.60)。NAC组和安慰剂组CIN的发生率分别为18%和14% (p = 1.0)。结论:在这项小型研究中,基线肾功能不全接受CA和/或PCI的患者在接受NAC或安慰剂治疗时,scr的变化和CIN的发生率没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Serum Creatinine Concentration in Patients with Chronic Renal Insufficiency Who Are Undergoing Coronary Angiography
Background: Prior studies have produced conflicting results on whether N-acetylcysteine (NAC) reduces the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CA). The dosing regimens of NAC in these studies seemed impractical for everyday clinical practice. Objective:We studied the effect of NAC, with a novel dosing strategy, on serum creatinine concentration (SCr), and the incidence of CIN, in patients who were undergoing CA and/or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Twenty-five subjects with baseline renal insufficiency who were undergoing CA and/or PCI were randomized to either NAC or placebo.The treatment schedule was 800 mg of NAC 12 h prior to angiography, 600 mg of NAC 2 h prior to angiography, and 600 mg of NAC 6 h after angiography or matching placebo. All subjects were hydrated with 1 ml/kg of 0.45% saline and received non-ionic contrast for angiography. The primary endpoint was change in SCr and the secondary endpoint was the incidence of CIN as defined by an increase of 0.5 mg/dl or 25% in SCr at 48 h. Results:The average SCr at enrollment was 1.7 mg/dl and average dye exposure was 171 ml. The average change in SCr in the NAC and placebo groups was 0.14 and 0.06 mg/dl, respectively (p = 0.60). The incidence of CIN was 18 and 14% in the NAC and placebo groups, respectively (p = 1.0). Conclusion: In this small study, there was no significant difference in the change inSCr nor the incidence of CIN in patients with baseline renal insufficiency undergoing CA and/or PCI who were treated with NAC or placebo.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信