心脏再同步化治疗心力衰竭:在此停留

W. Abraham
{"title":"心脏再同步化治疗心力衰竭:在此停留","authors":"W. Abraham","doi":"10.1159/000073836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accessible online at: www.karger.com/hed In this issue of Heart Drug, Piepoli et al. review data concerning the role of atrial-synchronized biventricular pacing, or cardiac resynchronization therapy, for the treatment of heart failure and pose the question: ‘Is it here to stay?’ As they point out, results from mechanistic studies of cardiac resynchronization have demonstrated improved cardiac function and enhanced hemodynamics determined either echocardiographically or by invasive techniques. In addition, observational clinical studies have shown improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in heart failure patients treated with resynchronization therapy. Of course, such data alone cannot support the broad application of such a therapy in clinical practice. Thus, a series of randomized controlled trials of resynchronization therapy including more than 4,000 patients have been completed, and the weight of evidence supporting the routine use of cardiac resynchronization for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic systolic heart failure and ventricular dysynchrony is now overwhelming. Results from these trials have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in NYHA class III and IV heart failure patients assigned to active resynchronization therapy [1–4]. In these patients, cardiac resynchronization has also been shown to improve cardiac structure and function, while significantly reducing the risk of worsening heart failure [1, 2]. In 2001, the first resynchronization device became commercially available in the United States. The next year, two devices which combine biventricular pacing capability with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration. Recently updated ACC/ AHA/NASPE Pacemaker and ICD Guidelines included cardiac resynchronization therapy as a Class IIA recommendation for pacing [5]. Since that time, preliminary results from another large-scale trial have suggested a significant reduction in the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization with cardiac resynchronization therapy in an advanced heart failure population [6]. Thus, cardiac resynchronization therapy not only makes heart failure patients feel better, it also helps them to live longer. Given these favorable effects on subjective as well as objective outcomes in heart failure patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy is here to stay.","PeriodicalId":87985,"journal":{"name":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","volume":"3 1","pages":"120 - 121"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000073836","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure: Here to Stay\",\"authors\":\"W. Abraham\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000073836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accessible online at: www.karger.com/hed In this issue of Heart Drug, Piepoli et al. review data concerning the role of atrial-synchronized biventricular pacing, or cardiac resynchronization therapy, for the treatment of heart failure and pose the question: ‘Is it here to stay?’ As they point out, results from mechanistic studies of cardiac resynchronization have demonstrated improved cardiac function and enhanced hemodynamics determined either echocardiographically or by invasive techniques. In addition, observational clinical studies have shown improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in heart failure patients treated with resynchronization therapy. Of course, such data alone cannot support the broad application of such a therapy in clinical practice. Thus, a series of randomized controlled trials of resynchronization therapy including more than 4,000 patients have been completed, and the weight of evidence supporting the routine use of cardiac resynchronization for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic systolic heart failure and ventricular dysynchrony is now overwhelming. Results from these trials have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in NYHA class III and IV heart failure patients assigned to active resynchronization therapy [1–4]. In these patients, cardiac resynchronization has also been shown to improve cardiac structure and function, while significantly reducing the risk of worsening heart failure [1, 2]. In 2001, the first resynchronization device became commercially available in the United States. The next year, two devices which combine biventricular pacing capability with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration. Recently updated ACC/ AHA/NASPE Pacemaker and ICD Guidelines included cardiac resynchronization therapy as a Class IIA recommendation for pacing [5]. Since that time, preliminary results from another large-scale trial have suggested a significant reduction in the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization with cardiac resynchronization therapy in an advanced heart failure population [6]. Thus, cardiac resynchronization therapy not only makes heart failure patients feel better, it also helps them to live longer. Given these favorable effects on subjective as well as objective outcomes in heart failure patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy is here to stay.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87985,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"120 - 121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000073836\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000073836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heartdrug : excellence in cardiovascular trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000073836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

在这一期的《心脏药物》中,Piepoli等人回顾了有关心房同步双心室起搏或心脏再同步化治疗在治疗心力衰竭中的作用的数据,并提出了一个问题:“它会继续存在吗?”“正如他们指出的那样,心脏再同步化的机制研究结果表明,超声心动图或侵入性技术可以改善心脏功能和增强血液动力学。”此外,观察性临床研究表明,接受再同步化治疗的心力衰竭患者的生活质量、功能状态和运动能力均有改善。当然,仅凭这些数据并不能支持这种疗法在临床实践中的广泛应用。因此,包括4000多名患者在内的一系列再同步化治疗的随机对照试验已经完成,支持心脏再同步化治疗中重度慢性收缩期心力衰竭和心室不同步化患者的证据的重量现在是压倒性的。这些试验的结果一致表明,NYHA III级和IV级心衰患者接受主动再同步治疗后,其生活质量、功能状态和运动能力均有显著改善[1-4]。在这些患者中,心脏再同步化也被证明可以改善心脏结构和功能,同时显著降低心力衰竭恶化的风险[1,2]。2001年,第一个再同步装置在美国上市。第二年,两种结合了双心室起搏功能和植入式心律转复除颤器(ICDs)的设备被美国食品和药物管理局批准使用。最近更新的ACC/ AHA/NASPE起搏器和ICD指南将心脏再同步化治疗作为起搏bb0的IIA级推荐。从那时起,另一项大规模试验的初步结果表明,在晚期心力衰竭人群中,心脏再同步化治疗可显著降低全因死亡率和全因住院治疗的联合终点。因此,心脏再同步化治疗不仅能让心力衰竭患者感觉更好,还能帮助他们活得更长。鉴于这些对心力衰竭患者的主观和客观结果的有利影响,心脏再同步化治疗将继续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure: Here to Stay
Accessible online at: www.karger.com/hed In this issue of Heart Drug, Piepoli et al. review data concerning the role of atrial-synchronized biventricular pacing, or cardiac resynchronization therapy, for the treatment of heart failure and pose the question: ‘Is it here to stay?’ As they point out, results from mechanistic studies of cardiac resynchronization have demonstrated improved cardiac function and enhanced hemodynamics determined either echocardiographically or by invasive techniques. In addition, observational clinical studies have shown improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in heart failure patients treated with resynchronization therapy. Of course, such data alone cannot support the broad application of such a therapy in clinical practice. Thus, a series of randomized controlled trials of resynchronization therapy including more than 4,000 patients have been completed, and the weight of evidence supporting the routine use of cardiac resynchronization for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic systolic heart failure and ventricular dysynchrony is now overwhelming. Results from these trials have consistently demonstrated significant improvements in quality of life, functional status, and exercise capacity in NYHA class III and IV heart failure patients assigned to active resynchronization therapy [1–4]. In these patients, cardiac resynchronization has also been shown to improve cardiac structure and function, while significantly reducing the risk of worsening heart failure [1, 2]. In 2001, the first resynchronization device became commercially available in the United States. The next year, two devices which combine biventricular pacing capability with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were approved for use by the US Food and Drug Administration. Recently updated ACC/ AHA/NASPE Pacemaker and ICD Guidelines included cardiac resynchronization therapy as a Class IIA recommendation for pacing [5]. Since that time, preliminary results from another large-scale trial have suggested a significant reduction in the combined endpoint of all-cause mortality and all-cause hospitalization with cardiac resynchronization therapy in an advanced heart failure population [6]. Thus, cardiac resynchronization therapy not only makes heart failure patients feel better, it also helps them to live longer. Given these favorable effects on subjective as well as objective outcomes in heart failure patients, cardiac resynchronization therapy is here to stay.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信