西印度岩鬣蜥无线电发射机连接方法研究进展

G. Gerber, K. Bradley, C. R. Knapp, A. Alberts, R. Goodman
{"title":"西印度岩鬣蜥无线电发射机连接方法研究进展","authors":"G. Gerber, K. Bradley, C. R. Knapp, A. Alberts, R. Goodman","doi":"10.1163/157075408X386169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods for attaching radio transmitters to rock iguanas (genus Cyclura ) are described and compared based on signal range, longevity of attachment, and potential disturbance to animal behavior or health. Case studies are described for all instances of internal implantation, ingestion, and external attachment of transmitters for which data are available. Signal range did not differ dramatically between attachment methods, but did differ between transmitter models and habitats in which iguanas were tracked. Only transmitters with coiled antennas showed a dramatic reduction in signal range. Longevity of transmitter attachment varied greatly among attachment methods, and was greatest for implantation, least for ingestion, and intermediate for external methods. Internal placement of transmitters via ingestion or implantation was advantageous in having no external apparatus to snag on vegetation or rocks. However, ingestion yielded less than one week of data, and implantation required costly, potentially stressful surgery. External attachment methods, including suturing of transmitters, mounting with adhesive, and harnesses or collars with breakaway mechanisms, entailed low cost and low risk, but were less reliable for long-term attachment. Harnesses or belts that lacked breakaway mechanisms entailed higher risk, because iguanas may suffer injury or death if not monitored frequently and recaptured for removal of attachment devices. In many studies, iguanas successfully mated, nested, and appeared to behave normally with transmitters attached by various methods. However, further research is needed to determine how different attachment methods affect the health, behavior, and survivorship of iguanas, particularly in smaller species and juveniles, which are more susceptible to predation.","PeriodicalId":55499,"journal":{"name":"Applied Herpetology","volume":"6 1","pages":"151-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/157075408X386169","citationCount":"24","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review of radio transmitter attachment methods for West Indian rock iguanas (genus Cyclura )\",\"authors\":\"G. Gerber, K. Bradley, C. R. Knapp, A. Alberts, R. Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/157075408X386169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Methods for attaching radio transmitters to rock iguanas (genus Cyclura ) are described and compared based on signal range, longevity of attachment, and potential disturbance to animal behavior or health. Case studies are described for all instances of internal implantation, ingestion, and external attachment of transmitters for which data are available. Signal range did not differ dramatically between attachment methods, but did differ between transmitter models and habitats in which iguanas were tracked. Only transmitters with coiled antennas showed a dramatic reduction in signal range. Longevity of transmitter attachment varied greatly among attachment methods, and was greatest for implantation, least for ingestion, and intermediate for external methods. Internal placement of transmitters via ingestion or implantation was advantageous in having no external apparatus to snag on vegetation or rocks. However, ingestion yielded less than one week of data, and implantation required costly, potentially stressful surgery. External attachment methods, including suturing of transmitters, mounting with adhesive, and harnesses or collars with breakaway mechanisms, entailed low cost and low risk, but were less reliable for long-term attachment. Harnesses or belts that lacked breakaway mechanisms entailed higher risk, because iguanas may suffer injury or death if not monitored frequently and recaptured for removal of attachment devices. In many studies, iguanas successfully mated, nested, and appeared to behave normally with transmitters attached by various methods. However, further research is needed to determine how different attachment methods affect the health, behavior, and survivorship of iguanas, particularly in smaller species and juveniles, which are more susceptible to predation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55499,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Herpetology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"151-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/157075408X386169\",\"citationCount\":\"24\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Herpetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/157075408X386169\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Herpetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/157075408X386169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

摘要

根据信号范围、附着寿命和对动物行为或健康的潜在干扰,描述并比较了将无线电发射机附着到岩鬣蜥(岩鬣蜥属)上的方法。案例研究描述了所有可获得数据的变送器的内部植入、摄取和外部附着的实例。信号范围在连接方式之间没有显著差异,但在传输器型号和鬣蜥被跟踪的栖息地之间确实存在差异。只有带有线圈天线的发射机显示出信号范围的急剧缩小。不同附着方式的传递器附着寿命差异较大,植入方式最长,摄入方式最短,外置方式居中。通过摄取或植入的方式在内部放置发射机是有利的,因为没有外部装置在植被或岩石上卡住。然而,摄取不到一周的数据,植入需要昂贵的,潜在的压力手术。外部连接方法,包括缝合发射器,用粘合剂安装,以及带分离机构的挽具或项圈,成本低,风险低,但长期连接不太可靠。缺乏分离机制的背带或皮带带来更高的风险,因为如果不经常监测和重新捕获鬣蜥以移除附属装置,鬣蜥可能会受伤或死亡。在许多研究中,鬣蜥成功地交配,筑巢,并表现出正常的行为,通过各种方法连接发射器。然而,需要进一步的研究来确定不同的依恋方式如何影响鬣蜥的健康、行为和生存,特别是在更容易被捕食的小物种和幼崽中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Review of radio transmitter attachment methods for West Indian rock iguanas (genus Cyclura )
Methods for attaching radio transmitters to rock iguanas (genus Cyclura ) are described and compared based on signal range, longevity of attachment, and potential disturbance to animal behavior or health. Case studies are described for all instances of internal implantation, ingestion, and external attachment of transmitters for which data are available. Signal range did not differ dramatically between attachment methods, but did differ between transmitter models and habitats in which iguanas were tracked. Only transmitters with coiled antennas showed a dramatic reduction in signal range. Longevity of transmitter attachment varied greatly among attachment methods, and was greatest for implantation, least for ingestion, and intermediate for external methods. Internal placement of transmitters via ingestion or implantation was advantageous in having no external apparatus to snag on vegetation or rocks. However, ingestion yielded less than one week of data, and implantation required costly, potentially stressful surgery. External attachment methods, including suturing of transmitters, mounting with adhesive, and harnesses or collars with breakaway mechanisms, entailed low cost and low risk, but were less reliable for long-term attachment. Harnesses or belts that lacked breakaway mechanisms entailed higher risk, because iguanas may suffer injury or death if not monitored frequently and recaptured for removal of attachment devices. In many studies, iguanas successfully mated, nested, and appeared to behave normally with transmitters attached by various methods. However, further research is needed to determine how different attachment methods affect the health, behavior, and survivorship of iguanas, particularly in smaller species and juveniles, which are more susceptible to predation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信