忙碌的蜜蜂:昆虫访花率在多种植物物种中的变化

IF 1.6 Q2 ENTOMOLOGY
M. Couvillon, Chandra M. Walter, Eluned M. Blows, T. Czaczkes, K. Alton, F. Ratnieks
{"title":"忙碌的蜜蜂:昆虫访花率在多种植物物种中的变化","authors":"M. Couvillon, Chandra M. Walter, Eluned M. Blows, T. Czaczkes, K. Alton, F. Ratnieks","doi":"10.1155/2015/134630","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We quantified insect visitation rates by counting how many flowers/inflorescences were probed per unit time for five plant species (four native and one garden: California lilac, bramble, ragwort, wild marjoram, and ivy) growing in Sussex, United Kingdom, by following individual insects () from nine functional groups (honey bees (Apis mellifera), bumble bees (Bombus spp.), hoverflies, flies, butterflies, beetles, wasps, non-Apidae bees, and moths). Additionally, we made a census of the insect diversity on the studied plant species. Overall we found that insect groups differed greatly in their rate of flower visits (), with bumble bees and honey bees visiting significantly more flowers per time (11.5 and 9.2 flowers/minute, resp.) than the other insect groups. Additionally, we report on a within-group difference in the non-Apidae bees, where the genus Osmia, which is often suggested as an alternative to honey bees as a managed pollinator, was very speedy (13.4 flowers/minute) compared to the other non-Apidae bees (4.3 flowers/minute). Our census showed that the plants attracted a range of insects, with the honey bee as the most abundant visitor (34%). Therefore, rate differences cannot be explained by particular specializations. Lastly, we discuss potential implications of our conclusions for pollination.","PeriodicalId":20890,"journal":{"name":"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology","volume":"2015 1","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/134630","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Busy Bees: Variation in Insect Flower-Visiting Rates across Multiple Plant Species\",\"authors\":\"M. Couvillon, Chandra M. Walter, Eluned M. Blows, T. Czaczkes, K. Alton, F. Ratnieks\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2015/134630\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We quantified insect visitation rates by counting how many flowers/inflorescences were probed per unit time for five plant species (four native and one garden: California lilac, bramble, ragwort, wild marjoram, and ivy) growing in Sussex, United Kingdom, by following individual insects () from nine functional groups (honey bees (Apis mellifera), bumble bees (Bombus spp.), hoverflies, flies, butterflies, beetles, wasps, non-Apidae bees, and moths). Additionally, we made a census of the insect diversity on the studied plant species. Overall we found that insect groups differed greatly in their rate of flower visits (), with bumble bees and honey bees visiting significantly more flowers per time (11.5 and 9.2 flowers/minute, resp.) than the other insect groups. Additionally, we report on a within-group difference in the non-Apidae bees, where the genus Osmia, which is often suggested as an alternative to honey bees as a managed pollinator, was very speedy (13.4 flowers/minute) compared to the other non-Apidae bees (4.3 flowers/minute). Our census showed that the plants attracted a range of insects, with the honey bee as the most abundant visitor (34%). Therefore, rate differences cannot be explained by particular specializations. Lastly, we discuss potential implications of our conclusions for pollination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20890,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology\",\"volume\":\"2015 1\",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2015/134630\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/134630\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psyche: A Journal of Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/134630","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们通过跟踪9个功能类群(蜜蜂(Apis mellifera)、大黄蜂(Bombus spp.)、食蚜蝇、苍蝇、蝴蝶、甲虫、黄蜂、非蚜科蜜蜂和飞蛾)的个体昆虫(),对生长在英国苏塞克斯的5种植物(4种本地植物和1种花园植物:加利福尼亚丁香、黑莓、苦苣苔、野生马郁兰和常春藤)在单位时间内被探测到的花/花序数量进行了量化。此外,我们还对研究植物物种的昆虫多样性进行了普查。总的来说,我们发现昆虫类群在访花率上存在很大差异(),大黄蜂和蜜蜂每次访花的次数明显多于其他昆虫类群(分别为11.5和9.2朵/分钟)。此外,我们报告了非蜜蜂科蜜蜂的组内差异,其中Osmia属(通常被认为是蜜蜂作为管理传粉者的替代品)与其他非蜜蜂(4.3花/分钟)相比,速度非常快(13.4花/分钟)。我们的调查显示,这些植物吸引了一系列昆虫,蜜蜂是最丰富的访客(34%)。因此,比率差异不能用特定的专门化来解释。最后,我们讨论了我们的结论对传粉的潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Busy Bees: Variation in Insect Flower-Visiting Rates across Multiple Plant Species
We quantified insect visitation rates by counting how many flowers/inflorescences were probed per unit time for five plant species (four native and one garden: California lilac, bramble, ragwort, wild marjoram, and ivy) growing in Sussex, United Kingdom, by following individual insects () from nine functional groups (honey bees (Apis mellifera), bumble bees (Bombus spp.), hoverflies, flies, butterflies, beetles, wasps, non-Apidae bees, and moths). Additionally, we made a census of the insect diversity on the studied plant species. Overall we found that insect groups differed greatly in their rate of flower visits (), with bumble bees and honey bees visiting significantly more flowers per time (11.5 and 9.2 flowers/minute, resp.) than the other insect groups. Additionally, we report on a within-group difference in the non-Apidae bees, where the genus Osmia, which is often suggested as an alternative to honey bees as a managed pollinator, was very speedy (13.4 flowers/minute) compared to the other non-Apidae bees (4.3 flowers/minute). Our census showed that the plants attracted a range of insects, with the honey bee as the most abundant visitor (34%). Therefore, rate differences cannot be explained by particular specializations. Lastly, we discuss potential implications of our conclusions for pollination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信